.the resulting CO2 recycled through a combustor, turbine, heat exchanger and compressor and then a miracle happens? The CO2 magically turns into fairy dust and disappears off the face of the Earth forever?
But no mention of what happens to the CO2 that would make it emissions free. It can't be recombined to make a hydrocarbon again because that would require more energy than you got out of it the first time.
So I looked up the details on the power plant in Laporte Texas mentioned in your article.
As it turns out, they haven't reinvented the laws of physics, or chemistry.
CO2 is captured and salable.
So the same amount of CO2 is produced. It will just be reused typically in the food industry. When you open your bottle of Pop or meat product, that CO2 will still be released. A market that is miniscule compared to the amount of CO2 we would be producing if every fossil fuel power plant were due capture their CO2 in this method and try to sell it. So it is very energy intensive, not scalable, and still requires natural gas which your comrades are against, as pointed out by hamloc.
But it sure sounds good in the CBC article.
But no mention of what happens to the CO2 that would make it emissions free. It can't be recombined to make a hydrocarbon again because that would require more energy than you got out of it the first time.
So I looked up the details on the power plant in Laporte Texas mentioned in your article.
As it turns out, they haven't reinvented the laws of physics, or chemistry.
CO2 is captured and salable.
So the same amount of CO2 is produced. It will just be reused typically in the food industry. When you open your bottle of Pop or meat product, that CO2 will still be released. A market that is miniscule compared to the amount of CO2 we would be producing if every fossil fuel power plant were due capture their CO2 in this method and try to sell it. So it is very energy intensive, not scalable, and still requires natural gas which your comrades are against, as pointed out by hamloc.
But it sure sounds good in the CBC article.
Comment