• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EV Vehicle recharge

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
    So A5 hydro is not considered renewable? Wrong again!

    "Hydropower, or hydroelectric power, is a renewable source of energy that generates power by using a dam or diversion structure to alter the natural flow of a river or other body of water. Hydropower relies on the endless, constantly recharging system of the water cycle to produce electricity, using a fuel—water—that is not reduced or eliminated in the process."

    https://www.energy.gov/eere/water/how-hydropower-works

    Some organizations are opposed to large scale hydropower mega projects based on the negative environmental impacts and excessive over budget costs. But since we already have 60% of our nations electricity from hydro none of them are suggesting we shut them down. Some are suggesting more smaller scale projects to lessen the negative impacts and other lower impact renewable options.

    In fact the NDP in BC decided to continue with site C after a review. So your assumption that all environmental organizations and progressive political parties are opposed to hydro power is wrong.
    Hydro cost even on the boondoggle SNC type operations will look good in a renewable economy.
    Power will worth 5x as it will be only reliable base load if Nuke can't get going. You want to talk cost overuns look at Nuclear.

    They have been trying to pull dams off the Snake river for a long while.
    Another court challenge going on now about the salmon that run the river may or may not be reduced therefore the Killer whales arn't as abundant on the west coast. Kind of like no tanker traffic hauling LNG off Canadian coast.

    They haul most grain to Portland on barges because the dams maintain river level.

    What was the BANANA thing.

    If it's important to commerce there is a group trying to shut it down.
    Back door socialism.
    Last edited by shtferbrains; Dec 31, 2021, 15:30.

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
      Before running your house with the truck you will have to wire in a transfer switch so that you don’t put electricity back into the power line. When I installed my back up generator in 1986 it wasn’t that expensive. Not sure what that costs in today’s world, I am sure $3-4000, maybe more. Nothing is free lol.
      Same for every backup generator system unless you manually shut off your supply and plug in the generator which is not recommended.

      Ford has some sort of auto transfer switch to do the job with the Lightning.

      Comment


        #83
        You got one ordered Chuck?
        Be a nice truck.
        Let us know how you like it.


        How much will the rebate be?
        Last edited by shtferbrains; Dec 31, 2021, 15:34.

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
          So I see you and some of the usual suspects are reverting to the half baked conspiracy theories to explain your world view.

          Apparently the engineers at Ford don't think using a F150 Lightning battery for a household backup is a bad idea. But what do Ford engineers know? LOL
          I don’t know Chuck. With the events as of late some of these half baked conspiracy theories seem more plausible everyday. Much as you partake in becoming net zero yourself and crusade for it on this silly chat group take a step back and see the outright bullshit we are fed unintentionally and intentionally by powers that be and bad actors. Wherever you stand on things don’t become a useful idiot. People are becoming more cult like all the time and even though we think we are of free will and independent thought we can be manipulated and controlled far easier than we think. I am not only singling you out but all of us here to scrutinize our own beliefs and information sources. If what we believe in stands up to our own scrutiny then it is easier to justify and you actually know what you’re talking about and not appear a fool full of shit.

          Comment


            #85
            So, given everything we have discussed in this thread, I will ask chuck again.

            What carbon neutral generation do you think will be scaled up to replace 100% of fossil fuels within the next 28 years, and in Canada's case, replace 40 percent of them within 8 years?

            You've seen the light, and have lately been adamant that it won't be intermittents.

            We are already a few decades behind the permitting process to get enough hydro built in the next 8 years, maybe still possible for 28 years.

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
              Just checked the logs on my solar inverters today at 12:00 noon.

              Minus 31 C, sun shining with a bit ice fog.

              17924 watts of output more than enough to cover our current usage with some left over for someone else to use. But only get a few hours of production per day at this time of year. But could have set a timer to charge an EV with a level 2 charger during the most productive hours.

              In total 37858 kwh of production in 2021!

              At 14 cents per kwh that is worth $5300 in Saskatchewan.

              At 20 cents per kwh that is worth $7571 in Alberta.

              I will publish our Sask Power consumption and generation numbers when I get our December bill in January.
              Is there any way you can use it for backup power in case of an extended power outage ?
              I know you said because of your back feed that you can’t ?
              Different hook up or something like that ?
              Just curious
              If I could use them for backup would sure change my mind

              Comment


                #87
                28 years sounds like a long time but 28 years ago was 1994.

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by TSIPP View Post
                  28 years sounds like a long time but 28 years ago was 1994.
                  Biden has a $12,500 usd tax credit for EV purchase.

                  Without the solar subsidies and tax credits and carbon offsets Teslas value is exactly zero. An Enron like ponzi but this time backed by the govt and ESG cults.

                  I love how the EV cult can explain exactly the power costs down to the dime but can’t explain Teslas P/E.

                  Everybody is flooding the space for the carbon credits that will be the next push. Carbon credits are the ultimate NFTs and will make the Ponzi scheme blow up by 1000x. People will actually pay for something totally intangible. Amazing what they have done. I am actually quite impressed at the level of mass hypnosis they have achieved.

                  Every body into the meta verse. I should have paid $500k to get some virtual property next to snoop dogg.
                  Last edited by jazz; Dec 31, 2021, 19:24.

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
                    I don’t know Chuck. With the events as of late some of these half baked conspiracy theories seem more plausible everyday................

                    If what we believe in stands up to our own scrutiny then it is easier to justify and you actually know what you’re talking about and not appear a fool full of shit.
                    Your observations about plausibility appear increasingly well founded.

                    Our own scrutiny is very important, but casting a broader net for info will lend the best defense against being the stinker.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	Conspiracy theories.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	76.7 KB
ID:	772168

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by burnt View Post
                      Your observations about plausibility appear increasingly well founded.

                      Our own scrutiny is very important, but casting a broader net for info will lend the best defense against being the stinker.

                      [ATTACH]9490[/ATTACH]
                      The lab leak theory is accepted by a lot of left leaning and ones I wouldn’t think of believing in bs. That’s a whole other ball of wax.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...