Cold out

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Another interesting quote from Chuck's article.
Selin says a good argument could be made that 280 is the ideal level of CO2 for human life, since it creates temperature ranges that are comfortable for the human body and allowed civilization to grow
Doesn't this contradict all reality? Prior to the industrial revolution, world population was nearly stagnant with almost constant major setbacks from weather and disease. Progress quality of life, affluence, health, life spans, education levels, urbanization, infant mortality were negligible.
During the industrial revolution, along with the accompanying rising CO2 levels, population has exploded, along with exponential improvements in every facet of life mentioned above.
Could I be forgiven for drawing the opposite conclusion as the MIT author? Correlation may not imply causation, but the results are incontestable.

[furrowtickler]

Could means absolute...... lol

[furrowtickler]

So A5 there is your answer from MIT for what is the ideal level of CO2.

Are you still going to tell us that it should be higher? Of course you know more than the scientists at MIT!

Now show us the scientific organizations and their reasoning that CO2 levels should be higher and that over 400 and rising is nothing to worry about.

We are waiting! Don't disappear or change the subject or call me a troll. Just provide the evidence.

Simple except we all know you don't have any evidence or can't produce any scientific organizations that says we should put more CO2 into the atmosphere. Give up!

I am sure that MIT has years of practical experience actually growing crops
Scientists that guess at what could be best for CO2 levels , then stated as proof lol

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Implement massive carbon tax to “save” the planet but let’s legalize pot, our dictator is such a hypocrite.

“ Studying more than 1,000 locations across the United States, researchers from Colorado State University calculated the median emissions of growing one kilogram of cannabis to be about 3,600 kilograms of CO2 equivalent emissions. The amount varies from roughly 2,300 to 5,200 kilograms of emissions per kilogram grown depending on location. To put that in perspective, a kilogram of tomatoes grown in a British Columbia greenhouse heated with natural gas emits roughly two kilograms.”

https://www.motherjones.com/environm...rgy-intensive/

So many actions that completely contradict the climate emergency narrative. Could there be an easier source of CO2 to eliminate than this example? Or bitcoin mining.

The industrial scale cannabis operation in Olds has giant tanks of CO2 in the yard.

Can you imagine anything more preposterous than building massive climate controlled buildings, pumping in water and CO2 and nutrients and artificial sunlight to grow something that half of my neighbors used to grow in the back 40 under natural conditions, and which is almost completely uncessecary.

[chuckChuck]

A5 we all know you don't have any evidence or can't produce any scientific organizations that says we should put more CO2 into the atmosphere.

You have had several years to produce credible evidence from a world class scientific organization to back up your arm chair opinions.

And all we get is more hot air! LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Chuck will be back next week.
Help not available on the weekend.

I just read Chuck's reply. Looks like he should have taken your advice and waited for the A team to come back on Monday and help him out. Instead he answered in his own words. Which appears to be a cut and paste of his previous post on the same topic without addressing any of the rebuttals posted above. But at least he's consistent.

Probably my fault though, after all I posted far too many questions and responses at once which always seems to overwhelm him I should know better and just stick with one single response with short simple sentences and no long words.
Maybe I will try again Monday.

[Guest]

cutting and pasting his own work , TF funny

[chuckChuck]

A5 you still haven't provided any evidence to back up your wacko idea that the world needs more CO2 and greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, not less.

The following previously posted sentences still apply. LOL

Don't disappear or change the subject or call me a troll. Just provide the evidence. Simple.

Except we all know you don't have any evidence or can't produce any scientific organizations that says we should put more CO2 into the atmosphere.

Its obvious you have given up long ago and resigned yourself to defeat by failing to post anything that even vaguely resembles credible scientific support for your bonehead idea hat we need more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

[TASFarms]

Why are you still arguing about co2. It a means for a tax scam nothing more. That is right from the top. The choice was h2o or co2. How has the $4 billion that Canada dished out at the Paris Climate summit helped. I see $500 million was donated to the Trudeau Foundation after

[furrowtickler]

Why are you still arguing about co2. It a means for a tax scam nothing more. That is right from the top. The choice was h2o or co2. How has the $4 billion that Canada dished out at the Paris Climate summit helped. I see $500 million was donated to the Trudeau Foundation after

End of the day , you just summed it up

[shtferbrains]

-31 here again this morning with -43 wind chill.
Same again tonight then about normal for tommorrow and more snow forcast.
Snowbanks from pushing snow are some of the biggest in recent memory.

[Guest]

and a hundred and seventy six f u c k e n dollar carbon tax , plus *** GSTon farm shops and house for month of dec what a sick f u c k e n joke
you *** cheerleaders have rocks in your *** heads