Capital Gains

[jazz]

AB when prime ministers act like kings I don’t see any problem being a noble. Beats serf any day.

You are talking about a just society where capital and ingenuity are r rewarded. That ship sailed a long time ago. I can only think about protection now.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Chuck, you couldn't be more wrong, or misunderstood me more if you tried.
I said nothing against farm size, or the rich.
I'm referring to how the tax structure punishes the ambitious and rewards the useless.
Anyone who has the ambition and the work ethic and the knowledge and the skills and the ideas should be encouraged to grow as big and as rich as they possibly can, society is absolutely better off when the most productive amongst us are permitted to do what they do best on hindered by taxes and regulations and meddling.


But to avoid the situation where a handful of Rich dynasties own everything regardless of skill or work ethic or ability.
But we still need tax revenue, without destroying all motivation to be profitable.
So instead of taxing profits along the way, tax at the end of life or end of career.

What's the nfu and NDP are saying is kneecap everyone who works too hard and is slightly more successful than the least common denominator. Destroying all work ethic. Drake everyone down until we are all equal. I suggest dragging everyone up with the opportunity to succeed but starting off from equality of opportunity. Not trying to engineer equality of outcomes, which has never worked and will never work.
I'm not jealous of someone who is exceedingly successful by their own hard work or innovative ideas. I'm just upset that countless other people who are possibly even more hard-working and more innovative never get the opportunity because the wealth and the assets and the opportunities get passed from generation to generation virtually tax free, bypassing the average tax paying citizen.

[blackpowder]

Good points all.
I'm not worried about an undeserving nobility because the third or fourth generation always pisses it away anyway.
What we don't want is handed down in perpetuity to increasing numbers of non farming descendants. I heard S.America that way?
Quite an evolution in farm accounting attitudes in my career. I feel sorry for the kids who have to sell to pay the tax but lay the blame squarely on the parents. I should know as mine sure kept their heads in the sand.
Hutterites are good neighbors here but do they have a distinct advantage in this area as well?
As for non farming beneficiaries, the higher the price goes, the more of those sell?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

AB5 you mustn’t have kids.

You work your whole lifetime to make things easier for the next generation, paying for assets with money you’ve already been taxed on and you think they should pay tax on it again. There are much better ways to keep the “dynasties” as you call them in line.

I’ve built my farm from scratch and would hope in someway it helps my kids not have to go through what I did. You might call that spoiled, but I’m sure they will earn their merit to society just the same.

WOW is all I can say!!!

I do have kids. I also spent 20 year working around the clock for wages, paying income tax in the top brackets trying to have enough capital left over to build a farm. No tax breaks. No inheritance. Buying most everything at arms length market value.

If I can pass on work ethic, and knowledge, and hands on experience and industry contacts to my kids and not a penny more, that will already put them head and shoulders above the average joe. I have no doubt that they would pick up the pieces, and start over and be just as successful.

I used to think the same, I don't want my kids to have to nearly kill themselves with work to succeed, as I had to. But there is a happy medium in there.

How do you propose to avoid a situation where a small minority have all the marbles, forever?

We can't all be like Chuck and NFU, and expect to just take it away from someone else who worked harder or smarter. Regardless of how we got here, we are the top of the 1%. The barriers to entry to anyone else to get into this business who isn't born into are massive, enabled in no small part by the tax system.

Even as blackpowder says, after 3 or 4 generations they will blow it all anyways. But that is 2 or 3 generations of coasting on the coat tails of hard working ancestors, of mediocre productivity, of lost opportunity for everyone else, and for the collective good of society.

[blackpowder]

A happy medium is what we're all after.
Reality seems to be.
If large enough to hand down to kids intact you can likely afford the taxes as they are today with good planning. Future increases aside.
The smaller ops will have a harder time. But they won't have kids taking over. So just retirement to fund and kids startup education etc. Taxes hit the "middle class" the hardest.
My plan here is that the corp will carry on for one more gen after me but not with my kids in it at all. Depending on their choices as adults.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Thanks for your thoughts Jwab. I agree with all of it.
And I also don't have an answer to publicly owned corporations becoming perpetual monopolies. But I suppose if the shareholders themselves are subject to punitive capital gains, that would have some effect. And of course allowing individual entrepreneurs the opportunity to put their Capital to work to create alternatives to the big corporations would help a lot too. Very difficult to do that when the individual entrepreneur is trying to build Capital at personal tax rates versus the corporation at corporate tax rates.
Within the tax code There needs to be some differentiation between personal income destined for investment and personal income destined for squandering.
Why do I have to invest in someone else's business within an rrsp to get a favorable tax rate, but I can't invest in my own business without paying prohibitive personal tax rates.
Consumption taxes as opposed to income taxes being the most obvious answer.

[Richard5]

Just bantered back and forth with my accountant, says she is seeing lots more clients locking in their gains now. Somethings coming.[/QUOTE]


Just curious if you accountant mentioned using your exemption using Bill C208? If I were someone that had a lot of exemption left I would never EVER sell a bunch of land to your company only to create the capital gain. 1 quarter maybe to create some shareholder loan but if someone is encouraging this you might want to get another opinion.

Had the discussion in July with my accountant on the following. Hopefully I can explain it right. Bill C208 is basically creating a capital gain that is eligible for your capital gains exemption by selling some of your common shares to another company that you own. You need to have a clear succession plan is the one hurdle so it wasn't a great fit for me presently.

Again, moving land into a corporation will only result in a taxable dividend to someone down the road. Make sure you understand the result 5-10-20 years down the road

And to the comment about creating a partnership with your wife and magically being able to use her exemption 2-3 year later is not correct also. As it was explained to me, the partnership's value would have to grow by 2 million in order to say your wife's share is 1 million (assuming 50/50). BE VERY careful as if this is not calculated correctly it will be a mess that will surface a few years down the road. My accountant says he has seen a few clients come in from other firms who have done this wrong and CRA reviewed. Not much he could suggest other than talking to a lawyer and suing for damages

[fjlip]

Agree richard, if wife is NOT deemed full time farmer, we had partnership for 19 years, all assets purchased jointly, land owned jointly. She never worked off farm in those years. Best review your situation with accountants, maybe lawyer first.

[Old Cowzilla]

This Nobleman had to install a new thrown in the basement a couple days ago. You would think with all this wealth I have I could have hired it done. Did send Justin some tax for the thrown thou !

[chuckChuck]

If the goal is to stay a step ahead of possible tax changes, keep in mind that companies don't vote, middle class taxpayers do.
Not much political fallout from taxing corporations. Where as taxing the voters is a sure way to lose the next election.
And farmers don't vote Liberal (except carpet farmers, right Chuck), so taxing corporate farms is the path of least resistance.
Be it gc, income tax, property taxes, environment tax or outright wealth tax.

You ignore the reality that the tax burden has shifted over time from corporate to personal taxes.

And since most farmers can incorporate and fit in the small business classification with relatively low tax rates up to $500,000 in net income where is the burden of farm corporate taxation you speak of?

I know libertarians often don't want to pay taxes but still want to enjoy the benefits of living in a developed country, but you are really barking up the wrong tree if you think incorporated farms who qualify for the small business exemption are paying a lot of taxes.