Tom, I’m afraid I can’t let this go without adding another perspective.
It is noble of you to try to convince everyone not to go though what you did in ’21 but the outcome left you very biased. It is a bit like a loved one being seriously injured in a traffic accident then trying to convince everyone not to drive. Instead of simply trying to suggest avoiding predictable risks.
The other experience of ’21 was producers that let grain buyers worry about the hedge by signing a deferred delivery contract then experiencing a catastrophic drought. How stress free do you think it was for them facing unimaginable buyouts in some cases. Even having to use crop insurance proceeds to cover the buyback. Fairly stressful as far as I can tell.
And what now, the same situation unfolding with even higher stakes. How stress free do you think it will be next summer as a producer not willing to forward sell (or any significant amount) given the fiasco of ’21, only to watch prices collapse for a variety of reasons while waiting to have the crop in the bin to sell. Especially given the input prices.
I would suggest you may have misjudged your tolerance for risk and volatility and blame it on your risk management account. Given your description and the scars it left, you may have been much more suited to simply buying a put option, hoping it expired worthless and accepting the price protection wouldn’t have been quite as good if prices fell.
If I had my way (and I know it's not possible), every producer of canola would have a tonne/ac of Nov 22 $700/t put options for $12.30/t (that it settled at on Friday). With a $10/t basis, the worst they would do is $15.37/bu ($700-12.3-10 = $677.70/t). With crop insurance coverage of say 30 bu/ac, the minimum revenue would be $461/ac (30x15.27) with $676/ac minimum out of a 44 bu/ac yield. And unlimited upside potential in revenue (if Macdon is right).
Then do what they do best, grow a good crop and see how the chips fall.
That would my idea of reducing stress, and that is what can be done with a commodity trading account…
It is noble of you to try to convince everyone not to go though what you did in ’21 but the outcome left you very biased. It is a bit like a loved one being seriously injured in a traffic accident then trying to convince everyone not to drive. Instead of simply trying to suggest avoiding predictable risks.
The other experience of ’21 was producers that let grain buyers worry about the hedge by signing a deferred delivery contract then experiencing a catastrophic drought. How stress free do you think it was for them facing unimaginable buyouts in some cases. Even having to use crop insurance proceeds to cover the buyback. Fairly stressful as far as I can tell.
And what now, the same situation unfolding with even higher stakes. How stress free do you think it will be next summer as a producer not willing to forward sell (or any significant amount) given the fiasco of ’21, only to watch prices collapse for a variety of reasons while waiting to have the crop in the bin to sell. Especially given the input prices.
I would suggest you may have misjudged your tolerance for risk and volatility and blame it on your risk management account. Given your description and the scars it left, you may have been much more suited to simply buying a put option, hoping it expired worthless and accepting the price protection wouldn’t have been quite as good if prices fell.
If I had my way (and I know it's not possible), every producer of canola would have a tonne/ac of Nov 22 $700/t put options for $12.30/t (that it settled at on Friday). With a $10/t basis, the worst they would do is $15.37/bu ($700-12.3-10 = $677.70/t). With crop insurance coverage of say 30 bu/ac, the minimum revenue would be $461/ac (30x15.27) with $676/ac minimum out of a 44 bu/ac yield. And unlimited upside potential in revenue (if Macdon is right).
Then do what they do best, grow a good crop and see how the chips fall.
That would my idea of reducing stress, and that is what can be done with a commodity trading account…
Comment