Can those in support of the current trucker blockades please tell me if these blockades should have been allowed or shut down and how you come to that decision.
The BC rail blockades started as blockades on reserve land and extended to lands which are still in dispute by unsettled land claims so they blocked rail service where tracks ran through those lands. Is there a different in stopping trains carrying goods than trucks and vehicles stopping good?
The Tyendinaga Mohawk rail blockades happened on reserve lands in eastern Canada. Same question as above?
Many of the KXL pipeline protests happened both on native lands and privately owned lands where the easements came by the way of eminent domain. Are pipelines blockades not okay even where where easements for crossing are granted by courts rather than negotiation with landowners?
In 2019 6o animal rights protestors blockaded a turkey barn in southern Alberta because of animal cruelty concerns. Most Canadians probably are opposed to animal cruelty so should protestors have the right to blockade a barn if they believe CFOs are animal cruelty?
Same year busloads of vegans protested at a hog farm in BC. If they lots of Canadians are against eating meat, should they be allowed to blockade a hog farm, or block access to meat packers?
And a hypothetical: Suppose this spring, emboldened by the freedom protestors, some protest group takes issue with farming practices. Just for laughs, lets say they are climate change fanatics and decide fertilizers are contributing to global warming and blockades NH3 unloading sites. Since lots of Canadians worry about climate change, should highway blockades in front of farm input suppliers be allowed? For how long should they be allowed to block movement of fertilizer? Until they get the government to ban fertilizer or place high taxes on fertilizers? Or if the public blockades the flow of diesel fuel in the spring or fall because of climate change concerns should farmers expect it to be ended, or are you willing to put up with that blockade seeing as it has some public support.
If the protestors of a cause claim it has public support, should blockades over that cause be allowed from now on? Where do you draw the line? Level of support? Or if it impacts you personally? Because if this protest is allowed to go until the protestors get what they want we will see many more.
The BC rail blockades started as blockades on reserve land and extended to lands which are still in dispute by unsettled land claims so they blocked rail service where tracks ran through those lands. Is there a different in stopping trains carrying goods than trucks and vehicles stopping good?
The Tyendinaga Mohawk rail blockades happened on reserve lands in eastern Canada. Same question as above?
Many of the KXL pipeline protests happened both on native lands and privately owned lands where the easements came by the way of eminent domain. Are pipelines blockades not okay even where where easements for crossing are granted by courts rather than negotiation with landowners?
In 2019 6o animal rights protestors blockaded a turkey barn in southern Alberta because of animal cruelty concerns. Most Canadians probably are opposed to animal cruelty so should protestors have the right to blockade a barn if they believe CFOs are animal cruelty?
Same year busloads of vegans protested at a hog farm in BC. If they lots of Canadians are against eating meat, should they be allowed to blockade a hog farm, or block access to meat packers?
And a hypothetical: Suppose this spring, emboldened by the freedom protestors, some protest group takes issue with farming practices. Just for laughs, lets say they are climate change fanatics and decide fertilizers are contributing to global warming and blockades NH3 unloading sites. Since lots of Canadians worry about climate change, should highway blockades in front of farm input suppliers be allowed? For how long should they be allowed to block movement of fertilizer? Until they get the government to ban fertilizer or place high taxes on fertilizers? Or if the public blockades the flow of diesel fuel in the spring or fall because of climate change concerns should farmers expect it to be ended, or are you willing to put up with that blockade seeing as it has some public support.
If the protestors of a cause claim it has public support, should blockades over that cause be allowed from now on? Where do you draw the line? Level of support? Or if it impacts you personally? Because if this protest is allowed to go until the protestors get what they want we will see many more.
Comment