I’ve never looked into the 30% targets but my neighbor has looked into it and says what we use is nowhere near the levels they want us to reduce from. I’m more worried about fart taxes and bs like that. Already shoestring things as it is.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fertilizer Use
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Originally posted by WiltonRanch View PostI’ve never looked into the 30% targets but my neighbor has looked into it and says what we use is nowhere near the levels they want us to reduce from. I’m more worried about fart taxes and bs like that. Already shoestring things as it is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dmlfarmer View PostOnly saying what they did in Denmark. And that was done because of N runoff, not climate change. Also need to point out Denmark starting point way higher than N rates in Canada but methods worked there so chances are will see same things tried here just for a different reason. Personally think new regs, mandates, and controls imposed will be more onerous and costly than taxes
They have required recommendations from certified agronomists for many years now.
Winter ****seed and Winter Wheat.
Split applications of N due to high rainfall over winter.
High yields and high EU type subsidies.
Intensive ag vs our extensive ag.
They have real problems with leaching and runoff.
We don't.
Very few direct comparisons.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dmlfarmer View PostOnly saying what they did in Denmark. And that was done because of N runoff, not climate change. Also need to point out Denmark starting point way higher than N rates in Canada but methods worked there so chances are will see same things tried here just for a different reason. Personally think new regs, mandates, and controls imposed will be more onerous and costly than taxes
Canada the home of European regulations and Australian farm supports.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shtferbrains View PostDenmark has had a problem with too much hog manure for their land base for generations.
They have required recommendations from certified agronomists for many years now.
Winter ****seed and Winter Wheat.
Split applications of N due to high rainfall over winter.
High yields and high EU type subsidies.
Intensive ag vs our extensive ag.
They have real problems with leaching and runoff.
We don't.
Very few direct comparisons.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WiltonRanch View PostI’d be in favour of higher gst if it meant income taxes were reduced. Consumption taxes are more fair. However it doesn’t work that way. Heir Freeland would up it all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oliver88 View PostWith the Jag & Justin pet projects, the most concerning tax grab for farmers might be capital gains changes, inheritance/death taxes, wealth taxes.
How this would be administrated on a farm by farm basis... is beyond me... livestock manure applications... etc... to soils... much to be figured out I was told...
Cheers
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
God have mercy on us if/when all these catastrophes come home to roost… Global Climate Change is the least of our problems…
Cheers!
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment