• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Carbon Capture

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Carbon Capture

    So this week the govt is expected to announce a tax credit for CCUS. That means 6 potential projects in the Edmonton area will probably go ahead. SaskPower will probably be doing the same.

    So oil companies get a tax credit for something farmers do naturally every year?

    Our farm groups didnt say a word about this?

    Trust the science I guess.

    #2
    Giving money to farmers isn’t part of the plan
    When they say forests are carbon neutral because the tree will be cut down and used at the end of its life. The odds of the roots of much of the forest get dug up is slim.

    Comment


      #3
      Carbon accounting. Have you done yours. You need to be able to substantiate your claim of sequestration by showing proof of being carbon negative in order to get paid credits. Yes, trust the science. Yes growing plants push carbon in the ground but how much carbon was emitted in the process. Do your accounting.
      It is known for instance that pushing high yields with nitrogen fertilizer actually mines your soil carbon in some crops more than others.
      The familiar adage - too much of a good thing is a bad thing - applies to atmospheric carbon dioxide: In higher concentrations, it is a damaging pollutant.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by TASFarms View Post
        Giving money to farmers isn’t part of the plan
        When they say forests are carbon neutral because the tree will be cut down and used at the end of its life. The odds of the roots of much of the forest get dug up is slim.
        Up to four times more root material than what’s above ground.

        Comment


          #5
          Can we pick the chart for how much is being sequestered?

          Comment


            #6

            The effects of enhanced CO2 on terrestrial plants are variable and complex and dependent on numerous factors

            Comment


              #7
              Plants have become an unlikely subject of political debate. Many projections suggest that burning fossil fuels and the resulting climate change will make it harder to grow enough food for everyone in the coming decades. But some groups opposed to limiting our emissions claim that higher levels of carbon dioxide (CO₂) will boost plants’ photosynthesis and so increase food […]

              Comment


                #8
                Soil organic carbon is a cornerstone of soil health. It improves soil structure while enhancing water- and nutrient-holding capacity, key factors for any agricultural production system. To build it up, farmers incorporate crop residues into soils.

                Comment


                  #10
                  Storing more carbon in soil helps slow climate change and makes croplands more productive. But there are two kinds of soil carbon that are both important, but function very differently.

                  Comment


                    #11
                    New York and London, January 10, 2022 – Prices for carbon offsets – verified emissions reductions equivalent to one ton of carbon each – could be as high as $120/ton or as low as $47/ton in 2050, according to research company BloombergNEF (BNEF).

                    It appears Mr Treadau has no interest in carbon credits as an option for the O&G sector.
                    It would seem Canada should have a huge natural advantage with our forests,wetlands,etc.
                    They were letting some of the BC tribes use their tribal forested land that is sequestering carbon now.

                    Rather than promoting our advantage the current government seems to want to minimize our potential and subsidize EV's or Solar Panels that require huge consumption of natural resources for minimal net gain to us.

                    Comment


                      #12
                      Originally posted by Austranada View Post
                      Carbon accounting. Have you done yours. You need to be able to substantiate your claim of sequestration by showing proof of being carbon negative in order to get paid credits. Yes, trust the science. Yes growing plants push carbon in the ground but how much carbon was emitted in the process. Do your accounting.
                      It is known for instance that pushing high yields with nitrogen fertilizer actually mines your soil carbon in some crops more than others.
                      https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2...than-it-helps/
                      It has to be more than 20 years ago now we were part of a program that used our crop insurance cropping data to claim carbon credits. At that time their credits were part of the Chicago Climate Exchange. We only participated for a short time. The jist of it was that farmers were paid for past direct seeding practices that sequestered carbon. The project didn't last very many years. I was satisfied at the time to get something.

                      The newest version is just starting to get going. We don't use Farmers Edge but they seem to be at the forefront of matching the farmer's precision farming data to the new carbon credit program. The outfit we work with is probably a year off yet from having a program.

                      Comment


                        #13
                        I would add that from what I have read that farmers should be able to do the paper work themselves for the carbon credit program and not have to use a precision ag company. I sorta equate it to do ones taxes themselves or using a accountant. From what I see things will be a hell of lot clearer next year.
                        Radicle is the Alberta company that seems to be at the forefront of all this. https://radiclebalance.com/agriculture

                        Comment


                          #14
                          Originally posted by jamesb View Post
                          I would add that from what I have read that farmers should be able to do the paper work themselves for the carbon credit program and not have to use a precision ag company. I sorta equate it to do ones taxes themselves or using a accountant. From what I see things will be a hell of lot clearer next year.
                          Radicle is the Alberta company that seems to be at the forefront of all this. https://radiclebalance.com/agriculture
                          Do you see ever getting the $47 to $120 a ton?

                          How many ton is a good number per 1000 acres?

                          Comment


                            #15
                            Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post
                            Do you see ever getting the $47 to $120 a ton?

                            How many ton is a good number per 1000 acres?
                            Not a clue. From what I can gather from the guy that I tracked down earlier in the year is that there is a hell of lot of unknowns. For me I am not signing on with anyone until things are clearer. I see some of the ag support type outfits really going hog-wild with this cause they smell money. In my mind the best case scenario is that things are ready do go for 2023. There is going to be lots of fine print to read.

                            Comment

                            • Reply to this Thread
                            • Return to Topic List
                            Working...