• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No more cheap reliable coal fired generation in AB.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post
    How many KW to replace the fossil fuels the ICE use in North America?
    S/B a simple 2 number calculation for anyone with a basic understanding of physics?
    That never included me.
    Nobody took a stab at this?
    How many renewable power kilowatts do we need to replace the total amount of fossil fuel we currently consume in North America? 24hrs a day with no brown out risk.
    To meet the current mandates?

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post
      Nobody took a stab at this??
      There is no use arguing tesla cult members.

      The logic for EV falls off way before a single KW is ever even generated. Its blown to pieces after the 500,000T of earth over burden is removed by FF to create a single Tesla that will have its battery in the landfill inside of 5 yrs.

      Oil will be sent to $500 a bbl by this cult. I am invested heavily in their ignorance and foolishness.

      Comment


        #53
        This graph explains it all.

        In over 200 yrs, no single source of energy has ever been displaced or replaced by any other. We have simply added on to the energy mix we already had. With the population growth we have had and now 2B more people to be born in the next 20 yrs and 2B people demanding to exit poverty, this will not change.

        There is no way renewables will ever replace anything. Period, full stop.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	renew.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	76.5 KB
ID:	773270

        Comment


          #54
          We've gone from "EV's will never work in Canada because they're too expensive/range anxiety/cold" to "here is a remote village in NWT that uses diesel generators so that's why EV's are a failure."

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by ALBERTAFARMER4 View Post
            We've gone from "EV's will never work in Canada because they're too expensive/range anxiety/cold" to "here is a remote village in NWT that uses diesel generators so that's why EV's are a failure."
            I assume you are responding to me. I've never made any of those claims, I readily acknowledge the benefits and efficiencies of an electric vehicle, even in spite of the limitations of our cold climate.
            I'm calling into question the patently false statistics you presented here regarding the CO2 emissions from a diesel fuel powered grid versus a gasoline powered car. And you have gone to Great lengths to avoid acknowledging that obvious error.
            This may be a genuine one-off mistake. But for me, it's called into question all of the supposed statistics and settled science being used to justify overthrowing our current functional energy infrastructure for the sake of reducing the amount of plant food we emit.
            Do you care to address the supposed 7 and 1/2 times less CO2 from an EV in Northwest Territories versus a gasoline car?

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
              I assume you are responding to me. I've never made any of those claims, I readily acknowledge the benefits and efficiencies of an electric vehicle, even in spite of the limitations of our cold climate.
              I'm calling into question the patently false statistics you presented here regarding the CO2 emissions from a diesel fuel powered grid versus a gasoline powered car. And you have gone to Great lengths to avoid acknowledging that obvious error.
              This may be a genuine one-off mistake. But for me, it's called into question all of the supposed statistics and settled science being used to justify overthrowing our current functional energy infrastructure for the sake of reducing the amount of plant food we emit.
              Do you care to address the supposed 7 and 1/2 times less CO2 from an EV in Northwest Territories versus a gasoline car?
              It appears to be a mistake in the website I used. I emailed them about it but you can look on the site for yourself if you want.

              http://www.albertaev.ca/why-electric/

              If you select Alberta it uses a live snapshot of the grid whereas other provinces it just uses their historical grid info.

              I showed my math and you're right NWT EV's are not very clean if you're using diesel generation. Any time you use an ICE you will be getting very poor efficiency. Statistically we are talking about a tiny slice of the Canadian population that lives off an electrical grid primarily powered by diesel.
              Last edited by ALBERTAFARMER4; Apr 14, 2022, 13:57.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by ALBERTAFARMER4 View Post
                It appears to be a mistake in the website I used. I emailed them about it but you can look on the site for yourself if you want.

                http://www.albertaev.ca/why-electric/

                If you select Alberta it uses a live snapshot of the grid whereas other provinces it just uses their historical grid info.

                I showed my math and you're right NWT EV's are not very clean if you're using diesel generation. Any time you use an ICE you will be getting very poor efficiency. Statistically we are talking about a tiny slice of the Canadian population that lives off an electrical grid primarily powered by diesel.
                Thanks. And we both agree that this example is not representative of anything relevant to most of the population.

                What is relevant, is that people want to believe something so badly, that they allow their confirmation bias to blind them to such a glaringly obvious false statistic such as this. You specifically chose the example of NWT because it is the worst case scenario, then proceeded to agree that it was still many times more efficient. Then continue to defend the claim when I pointed it out, trying various ways to justify it as true.

                This isn't to pick on you, but the unwillingness of so many of us to question patently unbelievable "facts" when they support our position.

                Comment

                • Reply to this Thread
                • Return to Topic List
                Working...