• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ag ministers reach new 5 year deal

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ag ministers reach new 5 year deal

    Article in the Western Producer. The only plus side is I am not enrolled in Agristability nor do I intend to be. Reading this article I can’t see that the supposed new deal between the Feds and the Provinces does anything to encourage me to re-enter Agristability, in fact far from it.

    #2
    Any producer with net sales exceeding $1 million needs an agri-environmental risk assessment by 2025 in order to receive AgriInvest contributions.

    Comment


      #3
      Only one opinion on this? Many have asked that the compensation rate be raised, they have now raised it to 80%

      No comment on the $250 million devoted to the Resilient Agriculture Landscape Program which will reward farmers for environmental stewardship?

      No comment on the agri-environmental risk assessment requirement to receive funds by 2025?

      Did the provincial ministers sign on because they knew it wouldn’t cost them any more money?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
        Only one opinion on this? Many have asked that the compensation rate be raised, they have now raised it to 80%

        No comment on the $250 million devoted to the Resilient Agriculture Landscape Program which will reward farmers for environmental stewardship?

        No comment on the agri-environmental risk assessment requirement to receive funds by 2025?

        Did the provincial ministers sign on because they knew it wouldn’t cost them any more money?
        It’s hard to formulate a strong opinion based on n article like that which is extremely short on details.I wonder if there is better info on the sask ag site?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Sheepwheat View Post
          It’s hard to formulate a strong opinion based on n article like that which is extremely short on details.I wonder if there is better info on the sask ag site?
          You don’t need details sheep. It’s clear as day that all at programs are going to tied to some sort of sustainability factors. You will be audited out the wazoo to participate.

          Ag invest is the only federal program I am in but for that measly amount they contribute it’s not worth having them nose around my operation.

          Ag ministers probably had a gun held to their head. Agree or funds get cut. This govt is all stick.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by jazz View Post
            You don’t need details sheep. It’s clear as day that all at programs are going to tied to some sort of sustainability factors. You will be audited out the wazoo to participate.

            Ag invest is the only federal program I am in but for that measly amount they contribute it’s not worth having them nose around my operation.

            Ag ministers probably had a gun held to their head. Agree or funds get cut. This govt is all stick.
            Oh for sure. It can’t be good. That is why it’s short on details IMO.

            Comment


              #7
              So the provinces agreed to this environment stuff?

              Who are they really representing?

              Linking environmental issues to a 10000 dollar agri-invest matching contribution?

              Someone didn't think very hard on this.

              I thought maybe that would say because I use an environmentally friendly (cough) machinery with a tier whatever engine , farmers would qualify.

              Who is representing the average farmer?

              Comment


                #8
                Hamloc - that wasn't my opinion. Just more information.

                The beatings will continue until morale improves.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by wiseguy
                  Only a fool would sign an agreement like that !
                  Well that pretty much sums it up. Marit doesn't qualify as a fool. He is just stupid.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by bucket View Post
                    Well that pretty much sums it up. Marit doesn't qualify as a fool. He is just stupid.
                    From the RRFN today:

                    “Canada’s Fertilizer Reduction Climate Plan – During meetings with his provincial ministers Friday, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he is moving forward with plans to cap fertilizer usage. Trudeau wants a 30 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and that can’t be done without a significant drop in fertilizer usage. The provincial agricultural ministers in Saskatchewan and Alberta criticized the climate change plan, saying it will be “catastrophic’ for farmers and increase food prices.“

                    Apparently Provincial Ag Ministers from AB, SK, and Ontario asked specifically to discuss this policy, BoBo refused to discuss it at all.

                    Trudeau and his drones fail Canadians, Food security issues, and responsibility to humanity .

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Why didn't they drop the fees for agristability?

                      You pay prior to the crop, they don't do the calculations until June of the next year with excuses as to why they haven't completed after 30 days of forms submitted.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Quick Dick McDick on the Canadian Fertilizer Ban

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...