• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canadian roundtable for sustainable crops CRSC???

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    the NFU is our spokesman for farmers. just let that sink in. Chuckys are in charge we are fu ked

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by SASKFARMER View Post
      the NFU is our spokesman for farmers. just let that sink in. Chuckys are in charge we are fu ked
      Not sure NFU are the spokesman I would think the F##k Trudeau flags and bumper stickers have a bigger impact and influence than them.

      Comment


        #18
        So interestingly enough a few years ago a crop wizard who i was lucky enough to do a farm trial with did a very intensive study north of St.Albert on intensive management of wheat. Long story short she had figured out a simple way to see what each cultivar was removing from the soil... soil sample/fertilizer rate/ discoveryield+protein/ then soil sample afterwards to figure out what the removal rate of each cultivar was. Some hard red varieties were as low as 40 ish % with some closer to 80.
        Should a bunch of money be put into such research continuing forward so we can ( and should / would want to) grow varieties that utilized the most amount of Nitrogen each and every year?
        Why is this not part of the emission reduction plan?

        Comment


          #19
          Because that makes sense and for liberals they don’t understand that.

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by goalieguy847 View Post
            So interestingly enough a few years ago a crop wizard who i was lucky enough to do a farm trial with did a very intensive study north of St.Albert on intensive management of wheat. Long story short she had figured out a simple way to see what each cultivar was removing from the soil... soil sample/fertilizer rate/ discoveryield+protein/ then soil sample afterwards to figure out what the removal rate of each cultivar was. Some hard red varieties were as low as 40 ish % with some closer to 80.
            Should a bunch of money be put into such research continuing forward so we can ( and should / would want to) grow varieties that utilized the most amount of Nitrogen each and every year?
            Why is this not part of the emission reduction plan?
            My understanding is that the typical variety trials hold the nutrients constant, therefore if new variety x does 5 % better than old variety y, that indicates that it is being more efficient and using the available nutrients.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by goalieguy847 View Post
              So interestingly enough a few years ago a crop wizard who i was lucky enough to do a farm trial with did a very intensive study north of St.Albert on intensive management of wheat. Long story short she had figured out a simple way to see what each cultivar was removing from the soil... soil sample/fertilizer rate/ discoveryield+protein/ then soil sample afterwards to figure out what the removal rate of each cultivar was. Some hard red varieties were as low as 40 ish % with some closer to 80.
              Should a bunch of money be put into such research continuing forward so we can ( and should / would want to) grow varieties that utilized the most amount of Nitrogen each and every year?
              Why is this not part of the emission reduction plan?
              Who decides on where R&D $ are spent? Do farmers through their commissions not have that say?

              Comment


                #22
                Looks like the Dutch farmers had the right response to the conditions imposed on them. Booted the climate government to the curb in the recent election.

                Comment


                  #23
                  I see there is an article in Western Producer about this. Why didn't they take this behind the barn and shoot it?

                  The underhanded way they are rolling out the second try . Two zoom meetings easily missed due to calving.

                  Anything with DU involved in any measure says it is garbage.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by bucket View Post
                    I see there is an article in Western Producer about this. Why didn't they take this behind the barn and shoot it?

                    The underhanded way they are rolling out the second try . Two zoom meetings easily missed due to calving.

                    Anything with DU involved in any measure says it is garbage.
                    On the first Roundtable of Wordsalad the point was definitely made that Ducks Unlimited should have zero input.

                    Why did they not listen?
                    What connection does Ducks Unlimited have with the organizers?

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Because DU is not a conservation group, it is a land accumulator.

                      Then they access government funding using their bullshit environmental scams.

                      The guys behind this roundtable should disclose all their relationships to various groups as to why they are promoting this.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...