Life was easier in here when you I were the only whackos nattering back and forth. I see we brought out some ghost writers tho and thats not a bad thing.
Some food for thought:
Ag. Policy has been and will continue to be as divisive as it was in the 70's, 80's, 90's and this century. On any given day, on any given issue, the vote is too close to count between the left and the right and I don't care what issue it is.
In the interim, when policy groups and the left and the right are killing trees with economic analysis of which marketing system, which transportation system, railcar ownership or any other flavour of the day, the world is passing us by.
As long as everyone is 51/49 today and 49/51 tomorrow, do you actually think politicians are going to stake their political career on a major policy move? NOT. SO everyone keep arguing, take sides, agree to disagree, don't make changes, keep the status quo (look Boone I wrote status quo and my keyboard still works!) and life will go on.
Ah, but there's the rub.
Someone in a posh hotel in Geneva at US$395.00 a night, is going to force change to what they want. Not what is best for our farms.
And that is exactly what Ottawa wants. If the West can't decide what they want - why should we? Consensus is a cowardly word in politics - a word that is entirely devoid of leadership.
The difference between farmers in Quebec, farmers in the U.S., and farmers in the E.U.? THEY FRIKKIN AGREE COLLECTIVELY IN PUBLIC. They fight behind closed doors and put on a unified front in the media and the public AND they generally get what they want.
We've been fighting over the same frikkin things for 25 years. Fighting over the CROW/WGTA really worked didn't it!
Fighting over the CWB is going to produce the same results.
Attrition in the farming communities in Saskatchewan will occur more quickly this year than any other year in the past. Yes, even when interest rates were 19-21%.
Maybe thats what it will take for a majority to agree.
10,000 farmers with a unified voice is much more effective than 60,000 split 51/49 today and 49/51 tomorrow.
And when we do get to 10,000 farmers and we will - I hope they realize what political power, market power and a unified voice can do for their farms. (the 1st guy to say we have that already with board - prepare to get flamed - think Avis Gray)
The 60,000 or so that we have today, havent.
And its hurting them.
The winds blow the sands of change slowly, you may argue, the problem is we are running out of time.
Some food for thought:
Ag. Policy has been and will continue to be as divisive as it was in the 70's, 80's, 90's and this century. On any given day, on any given issue, the vote is too close to count between the left and the right and I don't care what issue it is.
In the interim, when policy groups and the left and the right are killing trees with economic analysis of which marketing system, which transportation system, railcar ownership or any other flavour of the day, the world is passing us by.
As long as everyone is 51/49 today and 49/51 tomorrow, do you actually think politicians are going to stake their political career on a major policy move? NOT. SO everyone keep arguing, take sides, agree to disagree, don't make changes, keep the status quo (look Boone I wrote status quo and my keyboard still works!) and life will go on.
Ah, but there's the rub.
Someone in a posh hotel in Geneva at US$395.00 a night, is going to force change to what they want. Not what is best for our farms.
And that is exactly what Ottawa wants. If the West can't decide what they want - why should we? Consensus is a cowardly word in politics - a word that is entirely devoid of leadership.
The difference between farmers in Quebec, farmers in the U.S., and farmers in the E.U.? THEY FRIKKIN AGREE COLLECTIVELY IN PUBLIC. They fight behind closed doors and put on a unified front in the media and the public AND they generally get what they want.
We've been fighting over the same frikkin things for 25 years. Fighting over the CROW/WGTA really worked didn't it!
Fighting over the CWB is going to produce the same results.
Attrition in the farming communities in Saskatchewan will occur more quickly this year than any other year in the past. Yes, even when interest rates were 19-21%.
Maybe thats what it will take for a majority to agree.
10,000 farmers with a unified voice is much more effective than 60,000 split 51/49 today and 49/51 tomorrow.
And when we do get to 10,000 farmers and we will - I hope they realize what political power, market power and a unified voice can do for their farms. (the 1st guy to say we have that already with board - prepare to get flamed - think Avis Gray)
The 60,000 or so that we have today, havent.
And its hurting them.
The winds blow the sands of change slowly, you may argue, the problem is we are running out of time.
Comment