Durum

[wd9]

lakenheath, go back and read T4's post again and note the use of if and could.

[TOM4CWB]

Lakenheath;

Why do you accuse me of cheating...!

Our farm did not grow any of the crops the CWB limited delivery on this "A" series in 2005.

We grew the CWB IP contracted grain... which the CWB assured us up front they would take 100% before we grew it.

I was simply noting a fact... and emphasising the irony of CWB directors NOT being allowed to use CWB PPO contracts... while at the same time...

Leaving a gaping hole a Mack truck could drive through in the Code of Conduct/Conflict of Interest Guidelines.

Here is what I said AGSTAR77;

"If I had any inkling the CWB was not going to take 100% (some number under 99%) then I could overcontract tonnes... reduce that contract till I had the actual 100% done after the fact, as we are allowed to reduce tonnes if the CWB reduces tonnes.

So many games to be played... and directors get the inside track ahead of everyone else.

Not fair at all!"

I did not personally accuse any director of doing anything illegal...

The fact there is nothing illegal about an immoral CWB system was my point in the first place!

The CWB is supposed to honour the "A" series contracts... they accepted 40-50% of the contracted amonunt before rejecting 20% of the delivered amount!

The CWB does have 18 months to market the grain committed by growers under them. Yet after the CWB deciding to accept the contract... the CWB Directors went back on the contract.

THIS is wrong. This is Immoral. This is not an ethical way to run a business...

The fact is THIS action ran the directors square into the CWB Code of Conduct/Conflict of Interest Guidelines... and most CWB directors didn't have a clue... or even think twice about breaking their own bylaws.

We have a problem...

The fair application of the laws of Canada.

This is my job to bring it to Vader's attention... and your attention.

DO I MAKE MYSELF CLEAR THIS TIME?