• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who Controls Grain Handling?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    I have already told all that will listen that grain should be buyer or end user ready before it leaves the farm. Grain should be graded and marked. It could go directly to a loading facility not a traditional elevator.

    Comment


      #77
      eBay has been phenomonally successful on their online transactions.

      Parsley

      Comment


        #78
        Hello All,

        Not much has been said to "Who controls grain handling".

        Is ist not so, that the 'acredited companies' handle the grain? The CWB controls the sale and the CGC handles the quality and that the companies are bonded. The CWB sells much of our grain to the 'acredited' and they slam $10-20 on once purchased from the CWB, making the handling plus the 10-20. With that the can give in the finanial statments, that no money is and can be made from farmers grain, but from inputs and the 10-20 go through a special speculative account.

        Let's see, if Harper holds to his promise and get's done with one canadian meggot.

        I have no fear to meet the world on their terms, rather then the meggot terms.

        Comment


          #79
          If the Accredited Exporter (AE) can slam $10-20 on top of the price the CWB sells at, the CWB ain't getting no premium, right? FYI - AE’s can’t squeeze those kind of back-to-back margins out of CWB business. Also - grain trading revenues show up under marketing, trading, or something like that (not “a special speculative account”) and certainly not as elevation.

          The grain companies manage their assets as profit maximizers (as they should) to the best of their ability given the challenges of having two fundamentally different logistics systems – the CWB system (a passive system using contract calls with very large delivery windows, price is not used at all as an incentive or disincentive to deliver) and the non-CWB system (a proactive system using price as the incentive/disincentive to deliver into very specific delivery windows, to optimally manage space). They manage their non-CWB programs in such a manner so as not to interfere with the CWB program about which they know less than they should.

          The CWB manages its logistics using the grain handling system as a cost minimizer (as it should). The relationship with the grain handlers is not optimal as the grain companies see the CWB as a belligerent customer – they’d love to be able to do their job for the CWB without the CWB meddling and trying to manage the assets; the CWB sees the grain handlers as greedy service providers, some of which are also competitors; bottom line is the CWB doesn’t trust them which gets in the way of valid communications regarding sales programs and the like.

          Bottom line – the system is dysfunctional.

          Comment

          • Reply to this Thread
          • Return to Topic List
          Working...