• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CWB Reform; What do YOU Need?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Parsley;

    I believe it would be prudent to draw a line in the sand... before Conservatives (BC)... and after David (AD)!

    This way we could attribute responsibility to the appropriate leadership... no cross transfer of liabilities across the line.

    Does this make sense?

    Comment


      #22
      melville,

      The CWB is not the farmers' customer.
      I am not the CWB's customer, either.

      The CWB acts as a national compulsory licensing agency for the Government of Canada. Similarly, Elections Canada is the regulatory body for voting. I would not describe either licensing applicants or voters as customers.

      As a regional Government marketing agency, the CWB's customers are Russia, and Poland and China etc.

      But better permit books, and transparency and another layer of bureaucracy has been at the top of the Board's 'To do' list since 1947, right?

      1.I thought for sure you'd ask, melville.... what are the malting companies new contracts with individual farmers going to look like?

      1.(a) Shouldn't farmers be designing them?

      2.How do Customs facilitate truckloads of grain with regards to terrorism?

      3.What about price discovery for grain bypassing the Board.

      There are 1,156,751 more questions to ask.

      I'm not disgruntled. Yet.
      Parsley

      Comment


        #23
        TOM 4CWB

        No drawing crosses in the sand,(Nobody wants to deal with Hedy Fry),I agree with no cross transferring liabilities, (you don't know what's in the books), and absolutely no cross-dressing.

        Parsley

        Comment


          #24
          Parsley;

          I thought you were going to draw and quarter me there for a moment!

          Back to Basics:

          What are our standards to make our decisions?

          May I be so bold as to suggest some?

          The Golden Rule, in practical terms:

          Do not infringe upon the Rights, Freedoms or Property of others, and;


          Keep all contracts willingly, knowingly and intentionally;

          * That for every wrong there is a remedy,

          * The end does not justify the means,

          * Fundamental principals cannot be set aside to meet the demands of convenience or to prevent apparent hardship in a particular case,

          * Ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law,

          * Two wrongs do not make a right, and

          * One can enlarge the rights of the people, however they cannot be taken away without their informed consent.


          Any objections to using these as the standards?

          Comment


            #25
            Good Card Commercial Chaff!!!!

            Comment


              #26
              do the audit and see for yourself whats inside. if you dont find any weapons of mass destruction. then what.
              if you do find we have been makeing 50 cents a bushell more than the open market do you still axe the single desk. ( i know the answer to that )

              if we go that way , to lower domestic,prices (which might be great for the economy) We had better have some amercian style farm supports in place.
              The changes to the board are going to have a lot less impact on farmers than the farm support package, They should go hand in hand.
              Are we going to give away a WTO bargining chip and get nothing in return ,( probably too late for that now any way)
              IT seems strange that THE USA is bargining away( subsides that they havent even used yet) for actual canadian programs.

              and what kind of idiot Liberal OR conservative agreed to this subsidy cap thing in the first place.

              Comment


                #27
                Sawfly:

                If the CWB has been making 50 cents per bushel more than the open market – would you axe the CWB? I honestly can’t tell from your posting. (Not sure how you benchmark or measure that one anyway…)

                I have said it before and I’ll say it again – if it’s proven that the CWB provides a net benefit, I would not argue against it.

                When I talk about the impact of the CWB on the economy, I’m not talking about prices that are too high. Because of the way the CWB buys grain from farmers, farmers are forced to grow and sell other crops to generate cash flow. Because these crops – like canola and peas – are then sold off the combine, prices and driven much lower than they would be if wheat was also a cash crop. These low prices to farmers and system inefficiencies due to congestion etc are the cost to the economy I am talking about.

                In addition, there are other factors concerning the CWB’s activities that cost the farmer money – too many to go into right now. So if we’re talking about the CWB “making 50 cents per bushel more”, I hope these items would be factored in.

                Comment

                • Reply to this Thread
                • Return to Topic List
                Working...