• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Neville Nankivell

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Neville Nankivell

    Some exerpts from Neville Nankivell's 2006.03.08, column in the Financial section of the National Post titled "Tories can free West of CWB monopoly":

    EDITED QUOTES

    "With the election of a minority Conservative government, there's some real hope now in Western Canada of ending the near-monopoly powers there of the Canadian Wheat Board. In his election campaign, Prime Minister Stephen Harper pledged to bring this about by making producer participation in the government-backed corporation voluntary." ........

    "...............growing demands from large numbers of Prairie farmers ...opt out of the CWB ....."

    "The federal Liberal government, whose footprint is all over the CWB, continually rebuffed these calls."

    "It seems bizarre in Canada that certain farmers .... do not have the right to sell their produce freely on the open market..."

    "Astonishingly, some Prairie farmers have actually been jailed for testing the CWB's monopoly by taking a few truckloads of wheat across the U.S. border, where they could get higher prices. They were charged in the mid-1990s under the Customs Act with exporting without a CWB licence. These convictions have since been either quashed or retrials ordered and 15 Saskatchewan farmers are now suing the federal government for "massive" abuse of power and "malicious" prosecution. Claiming damages of $2-million each, these farmers contend they were improperly charged. They allege the federal government knew at the time the charges were "bogus and unenforceable" but hurriedly amended customs regulations to close legal loopholes." .................


    "The Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association, a group that has long advocated free choice in marketing, recommends a two-stage approach."

    "First would be to implement dual marketing through regulatory changes that would bring practices in the West in line with those of eastern farmers. (Ontario has a voluntary system for its wheat marketing board.) Under this proposal, the CWB would give farmers and private-sector grain companies export permits at no cost."..........

    "The second stage would involve restructuring the CWB into a completely producer owned and controlled organization..............."

    ........."While so far the CWB has fended off these cases, it's inevitable there will be more challenges as new trade rules emerge and harder aim is taken at state-backed monopolies that have substantial pricing discretion and are insulated from commercial risks."

    ........"The minority Conservative government can expect opposition to these kinds of changes from the Liberals and NDP. But in the election the Conservatives had solid support in virtually all Western rural ridings. This gives Harper a mandate to go ahead.".............

    ............ "The well-respected and plucky Strahl, who didn't let a rare form of inoperable cancer keep him from standing for re-election.....said recently that a dual-marketing system would increase farmer options and the opportunity to maximize their returns."

    " To keep his party's faith with western farmers, he should ready a grain-marketing reform package as soon as possible."

    Parsley

    #2
    In today's article, farmers can glimpse the CWB's contingency plan for market choice:

    2006.03.08
    The Star Phoenix(Saskatatoon)

    written by Larry Kusch



    .................."Maureen Fitzhenry, a wheat board spokesperson, said Tuesday that as far as the CWB is concerned, there has been no movement to change the Canadian grain marketing system."..................

    ............"There has been an election promise, and that's all there's been at this point. So if various entities in the system choose to make contingency plans, I guess that's up to them," she said.".........

    Parsley

    Comment


      #3
      It would seem the people at the CWB think the old Colin Thatcher stratedgy of "Deny, Deny, Deny" is a good one? Or maybe they figure Harper was just kidding when he promised western grain farmers a new deal?
      It would be interesting to see how many of them are typing out resumes and mailing them off to Cargill or ADM or Dreyfuss?

      Comment


        #4
        A quote from March 9,today's Regina's Leader-Post written by Angela Hall:


        New safety net, CWB changes coming


        "Farmers can expect to see a new farm safety net program and changes to the Canadian Wheat Board under the Conservative government -- but it won't happen overnight.

        Federal Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl acknowledged both campaign promises during a stop in Regina on Wednesday.

        But the strategy with the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB), which currently exports all wheat and barley from Western Canada, is one of "evolution rather than a revolution," Strahl said.

        The Conservatives campaigned on a commitment to give farmers the choice whether or not to sell their crops through the board, and discussions on the role of the CWB will continue, Strahl said.

        "There will be changes. Some of them have already happened and some of them have come from within," Strahl told reporters.

        "I think change is coming, but I think that change needs to be done carefully and I don't want to do it in a way that's going to harm the industry overall." ....................

        Parsley

        Comment


          #5
          cowman,

          Grainvision's advice to Minister Strahl doesn't groove with the Terminal Association's advice to Strahl, but some farmers are asking, and rightly so, if some members from industry signed BOTH of the opposing recommendations?

          Tom4CWB what do you know about doublespeak?

          Parsley

          Comment


            #6
            Geez Chuck, Do you think you could be any more incoherent, are you a human enigma?

            Your enthusiasm for open marketing is under whelming to say the least. I guess you think 15 years of debate, study and consultation in not quite enough for “the industry”.

            “Evolution vs. Revolution?

            Or Politics vs. Principles?

            Or Inaction vs. Action?

            Or Flying Blind vs. Clear Objective?

            Or ?

            "I think change is coming, but I think that change needs to be done carefully and I don't want to do it in a way that's going to harm the industry overall." ....................

            And the industry is in such rock solid shape isn’t it, Chuck? Check out Ritchie Bro. Auction Sale catalog. There is a revolution going on. But that’s just with primary grain producers, we don’t count, never did. It’s all those ag jobs in cities that need to be protected. Not having some form of strike at the terminals every year would be too revolutionary. Lord knows we sure wouldn’t want Canada Malt being inconvenienced. Having to accept the slightest degree of risk and taking away the malt industries ability to reject barley but still use it for malt, would be radical indeed.

            Yes we must tread carefully here. Toppling a sacred cash cow isn’t something you do in haste!

            The principles of a Free Market are great for talk radio, or even a discussion over dinner and cocktails but, let’s be serious, it’s not something we actually will adopt. It’s far too risky. It’s…, it’s…, well too revolutionary!

            Gotta go now, need to cancel my membership in the Conservative Party of Canada!

            Comment


              #7
              The conservative/reform party is treading lightly as they like the perks of Ottawa life and wish to keep them . With less than 40 % approval of those that voted they can't act from a position of strength. So what's the rush about marketing the real problem is survival of a viable agricultural economy not some airy fairy debate about freedom. I think George Bush used that arguement to invade Iraq and we know how well that's going.lol.

              Comment


                #8
                agstar77

                Would you be opposed to the CWB issuing no cost export licences to organic farmers? If you are, how would this impact your CWB payments/overall pool returns? Is the argument about organic farmers or a slippey slope that would allow pricing conventional wheat outside the board?

                Comment


                  #9
                  If the quantity is small , say less than 1 % of total exports, I don't have a problem. What I would like to see is the CWB become the E-Bay and Pay-Pal of grains and oilseeds providing guarantees and facilitating transport for these smaller export markets. I do have a problem with the whole organic mirage , but if consumers are that gullible who am I to stand in the way of thse who can make more money using less fertilizer and chemicals.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Off topic from original thread but may be an indication of where the governments attention is/should be.

                    Going through my newsletters this morning, noting lots of concern about a successfull Doha round of WTO.

                    I also note the CWB press release from yesterday that highlights an industry letter regarding the impact of bilateral relations on Canadian farmers.

                    http://www.cwb.ca/en/news/releases/2006/030906.jsp

                    Strange bedfellows and obviously a CWB spin but does highlight where attention should be over the next couple of months. A successfull completion of the WTO round with clear and fair trade rules is critical to western Canadian farms. CWB operations will be an element of this negotiation.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I'll pass on the organic bait, agstar77.

                      But read this this e-mail, as it seems to have a practical easy solution:
                      _______________________________________

                      The Governor in Council can order the Canadian Wheat Board to grant export licences for any wheat and barley that falls under the constitutional head of "Agriculture".

                      1. Sections 3, 6 and 18 of the Canadian Wheat Board Act state:

                      QUOTE FROM CWB ACT

                      Duty to comply

                      3.12 (2) The directors and officers of the Corporation shall comply with this Act, the regulations, the by-laws of the Corporation and any directions given to the Corporation under this Act.

                      6(1)(j) to act as agent for or on behalf of any minister or agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada in respect of any operations that it may be directed to carry out by the Governor in Council

                      Directions by Governor in Council

                      18. (1) The Governor in Council may, by order, direct the Corporation with respect to the manner in which any of its operations, powers and duties under this Act shall be conducted, exercised or performed.

                      Directors

                      (1.1) The directors shall cause the directions to be implemented.....
                      END OF QUOTE FROM CWB ACT



                      2. In his March 12, 1997, written address to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, Director General Adaptation and Grain Policy, Howard Migie stated that in the early 1980's the Government had ordered the CWB to provide an export licence for barley from Ontario.


                      The Governor in Council can order the Canadian Wheat Board to grant export licences for any wheat and barley that falls under the constitutional head of "Agriculture to PRODUCERS".

                      A simple way to get dual marketing for farmers isn't it?

                      _______________________________________
                      agstar, wouldn't less than 1% bother to apply for an export license?

                      Parsley

                      Comment


                        #12
                        charliep,
                        A no-cost license means you must sell your grain to the CWB, and buy it back again buyback but the buyback cost is $0.00.

                        A no-buyback license means you do not sell it to the Board, in fact you do not go through Board pooling or marketing. THis is what Ontario enjoys.

                        Do you mean to say a no-buyback license, charliep?

                        Parsley

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Yes. A no-buyback license.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Agstar77. Nitrate poisoning across all of North America is not a mirage. Dead spots in Oceans across the world (acriculture nitrates)are not mirages either. Look in the mirror before taking a poke at organics. I am not an organic, but I do give organic producers a lot of credit. They are many times more enivornmentally responsible than conventional farmers. I believe this has to be factored into what price they recieve for their product. Not to mention the fact that their product is in fact "organic".

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I didn't say I don't approve of the decrease in use of herbicides etc. My point is organic has not proven to be of health benefit to consumers directly. I applaud farmers for taking advantage of the market nothing more. If you produce organic food what do the rest of us produce inorganic food? If we can produce nutritionaly sound food without buying chemicals , far be it from me to be a naysayer. I just find the whole idea of organic being better food ubelievable. I would favour lower input farming if I could make money from it.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...