CWB Survey

[parsley]

Jagfarms,

The way to do business is not set in stone, but there are some tried and true ways:

1. Don't disparage your customers. They are the farmers who provide you with the cash for trucking and they deserve some loyalty.

2. Don't presume that fancy equipment always reflects financial viability. In Saskatchewan, the famers who are in the most dire straights are the big farmers. That is what my friends working in Farm Debt Review will tell you.

3.You are obviously trying to disparage all the farmers wanting marketing choice by painting them as 'losers'. Unfortunately, that tactic reflects not upon them, but upon you.

3.You can disagree with someone's beliefs because they are Catholic whilst you are a Baptist. But disagree with the part of the scripture that you find egregious, don't pick on the guy's kids or his machinery or his house or his car, or his choices. In other words, keep the discussion to ideas.

4. And if you really want to have a discusion about the display of material wealth as an indication of a successful farmer, make sure that your finances are in order.

What you are telling us on this thread is that all farmers who want marketing choice are losers, are poor managers, are poor farmers. And you've asked each of your customers where they stand and 'relegated' each Choice farmer to the Loser's List.
I'm glad you told us.

Thanks for informing us about your Loser policy. I'll make a note that next time I recommend trucking and container companies to the countless number of farmers who are increasingly looking towards identity preserved shipping, that Loser's need not apply to Jagfarms.

Parsley

PS

Nice to have non-Board grains to pay the bills, isn't it?

[sawfly]

Jags post is a fitting response to the theory that the anti board forces spew all the time.
1 that the only board supporters are small ineffecint 80 yr.old socialists.

2 . that these board supporters are just too lazy to market their own grain, and too old to learn.

While i think every farmer without mouldy money,oil, or horse shoes is on his way to broke. Im sure there must be some be some excellent anti board farmers out there. LOL

stereotypeing has been a big part of the antiboard side for a long time. a little pay back dont hurt

[chaffmeister]

Jagfarms: In the interests of understanding more, I have some specific questions.

About the CWB, you said:
“overall I think they are not doing too bad of a job.”
What specifically makes you think that?


“I think they get a better price for us in the long run.”
What specifically makes you think that?
I understand what you are saying about selling at harvest. But what you may not understand is that prices are low at harvest BECAUSE people sell TOO MUCH grain for the system and end-users to absorb. So that comes with a price. And part of the problem is that these guys aren’t getting enough from their CWB grains. So they have to sell canola into a hole.


“Without the CWB we will be at the mercy of the multinationals like DUPONT, MONSANTO, ADM - not even Canadian companies.”
What specifically makes you think that?


“Once we are at the mercy of the multinationals, we may have to buy all our seed from them as well as all our farm inputs and if we don't they won't buy our product.”
What specifically makes you think that? (I’m looking for proof, not supposition.)


“The multinationals are brainwashing us trying to suck us in so that they can control us.”
What specifically makes you think that?
(Some would say that this is an apt description of the CWB.)


“They sponsor all the universities and colleges to teach what is good for them not good for us.”
What specifically makes you think that?
(The CWB spends a lot sponsoring universities as well…)


“We have to think we we we not me me me.”
Agreed. What makes you think that open market supporters are being selfish? You should note that many who support an open market are very much for value-added for their community. To me, that’s community thinking.


“if we lose the CWB, we may end up with 5 or 6 farmers farming the same land 25 farmers farmed in the past.”
What specifically makes you think that? If I told you the CWB was costing you real dollars as well as opportunities, would you still think the CWB keeps farmers on the land?



Jag – these are not rhetorical questions. I sincerely would like to see your answers.

It’s crunch time. This industry needs to make some serious decisions and they should be made on sound information, not suppositions and presumptions, not rhetoric – and certainly not on the basis of fear.

It’s very disappointing to hear NOTHING from the CWB regarding its true value – just rhetoric and fear mongering: “premium prices, market power, one seller instead of thousands, market development, we support value-added, those nasty multinationals, nobody should tell us how to market our grain (re WTO - irony at an extreme), etc, etc. Nothing but rhetoric – no substance, and much of it misleading and borderline misrepresentation.

If I had someone like the CWB working for me you can be sure I’d want to see tangible, measurable results. The CWB may get you better prices, but as it stands right now, you’ll never know (and from what I DO know, I'm unconvinced). I for one would not want to build a business on their assurances.

[Jagfarms]

History of the CWB cut and pasted from the CWB website

History
The history of the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) is grounded in the experience of farmers prior to World War I. Many farmers at the time felt captive to the railways, the line elevator companies, and the Winnipeg Grain Exchange for the delivery, weighing, grading, and pricing of their grain. They wanted greater power and protection for themselves in the grain marketing system. They developed a strong confidence in cooperative strategies and government intervention for addressing their needs and therefore established the Grain Growers' Grain Company in 1905 and put pressure on the provincial governments to establish provincially owned elevator companies in subsequent years and on the federal government to pass the Canada Grain Act in 1912 establishing the Canadian Grain Commission as the official weigher and inspector of grain.

During the First World War the federal government was eventually forced by wartime conditions to become directly involved in grain marketing by establishing a body called the "Board of Grain Supervisors " (BGS) for the 1917-18 and 1918-19 crop years. Wheat futures trading in Winnipeg was suspended in 1917 and the BGS assumed complete control over the purchase, sale and pricing of wheat for export.

After the war the federal government replaced the BGS with the first Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) to market the 1919 wheat crop. The CWB's mandate was to sell wheat in domestic and export markets at prices in accordance with world levels. This meant that the Board could not determine the final value of wheat marketed on behalf of producers and the returns due to them until its sales for the entire crop year had been completed.

To deal with this uncertainty, the Board implemented a two-payment system. Producers were first given an initial, or part payment when they delivered their wheat to elevators, and a final payment at the end of the marketing year once the financial results of the sale of the 1919 wheat crop were known. The initial payment was, in effect, a floor price guaranteed by the federal government and any deficit was to be absorbed by the government.

The CWB of 1919-20, like the BGS before it, was seen as an extraordinary measure by both the federal government and its political supporters in the Canadian grain trade, one that it was felt could not be justified as a permanent marketing arrangement under peacetime conditions, so it was disbanded in 1920 after one year's operation. However, in this one year the concept had gained widespread support among farmers and farm organizations throughout Western Canada. These organizations opposed the abandonment of the CWB in 1920 and began immediately to press the government to re-establish it. When the government refused to do this, farmers took action of their own and created "Wheat Pools" in each of the three Prairie provinces in 1923. The Pools also set up their own jointly owned Central Selling Agency for wheat and their system of payments for wheat deliveries was similar to that established under the 1919-20 Wheat Board.

The Pools operated well for several years, but the federal government was once again forced to intervene in grain marketing after the collapse of international wheat prices in 1929 and the onset of the Great Depression. Wheat market prices fell to such low levels that the Wheat Pools could no longer hope to recover from the market what they had paid out in initial payments for the harvest of 1929, and were facing bankruptcy. From 1930 onward, the federal government had to step in and provide the bankers of the Wheat Pools with a federal guarantee on their loans to the Wheat Pools, and had to guarantee the Pools' initial payments to farmers. In this situation, it decided to put its own representative in place as the general manager of the Central Selling Agency. In the early 1930s the federal government still hoped that its involvement in grain marketing would be temporary and that it would be able to extricate itself from this in time and return all grain marketing activities to the private sector. When it became clear by 1935, however, that its involvement was going to be longer-term than originally envisaged, it decided to formalize that involvement and enact the Canadian Wheat Board Act, which was signed into law on July 5, 1935. As with the 1919 Wheat Board, any losses incurred by the new CWB on its operations were to be absorbed by the federal government and any profits were to be returned to producers who delivered wheat to the CWB.

Over the years, the CWB's authority over the marketing of types of grain has varied considerably. At first, deliveries to the CWB were voluntary, and it handled only wheat. Then, during World War II, the CWB was empowered to market all Canadian grains, including oilseeds and Ontario corn. Wheat futures trading was suspended in 1943 in the conditions of wartime and deliveries to the CWB became compulsory.

In 1949, Parliament amended the Canadian Wheat Board Act to extend the CWB's marketing responsibility to encompass oats and barley, but retained a clause that required the Act's renewal by Parliament every five years. In 1966, this clause was removed and the Canadian Wheat Board Act became permanent legislation. In 1974, inter-provincial sales of wheat, oats and barley for use in animal feeds within Canada were removed from the sole authority of the CWB. In 1989, the marketing of oats was also removed from the authority of the Board, leaving it responsible only for the marketing of wheat and barley both for export and for human consumption domestically.

The operations of the CWB in the 1940s marked the transition of the new-born agency from voluntary marketer to monopoly board. Out of the necessity created by wartime economic conditions, the CWB assumed many powers during a tumultuous period for Canadian agriculture. The Second World War changed the grain marketing picture for Canada considerably. Canada's primary grain markets at that time were in Western Europe. Almost all of those markets were cut off by the German invasion and occupation, leaving the United Kingdom the sole Western European outlet for Canadian grain.

At the same time, the CWB was drawn into the government's wartime price controls policy as the administrator of the maximum price provisions on grains. Beginning August 1, 1942, it was responsible for handling the government account for existing flaxseed stocks and thereafter the CWB was the sole buyer of flaxseed. It was also empowered to purchase soybeans at a fixed price for the account of the wartime prices and trade board. ****seed was a virtually unknown crop in Western Canada early in 1943, but its oil was needed for the war effort. The CWB was persuaded to act as an agent of the prices board in accepting delivery of this oilseed and its production increased over the next five years.

War rapidly changed the demand for grain from Canada and affected the grain markets in the early 1940s. The United States, now the world's largest grain exporter, was actually Western Canada's biggest customer for wheat and feed grains in this period. Along with an increased demand for wheat in Britain and North America came escalating wheat prices on the American and Canadian grain futures markets. The Canadian government was committed to a policy of price control during the war years and the rising wheat prices created new problems for this policy and for its desire to provide food aid to its European allies. The CWB, still a voluntary agency, could not source wheat a rising market since Prairie farmers were more inclined to deliver their wheat for the higher spot market prices offered by the private traders than for the CWB's initial payments. Canadian commitments to deliver wheat to its allies were put in jeopardy. It became obvious that some action would have to be taken to secure wheat supply to meet wartime obligations. In September 1943 the federal government halted wheat futures trading on the Winnipeg Grain Exchange and made the Canadian Wheat Board the sole authorized receiver and monopoly marketer of Western Canadian wheat.

At the outset of the five years following the end of the Second World War the Canadian government signed a five-year wheat supply agreement with the British government to secure some stability in wheat prices, and it was felt prudent to maintain the Canadian Wheat Board as a monopoly marketing agency to execute this agreement. Canadian farm leaders and their organizations and a large majority of Prairie grain farmers were supportive of the CWB marketing system; this was confirmed at least partly by a plebiscite on CWB marketing of barley and oats in 1951 in Manitoba in which 31,000 of 35,000 farmers (89%) voted "yes" to continuing to have their barley and oats marketed under the monopoly of the CWB.

To fulfill the various duties that it had acquired during the war years, the staff of the Board had grown rapidly. From a staff of 35 at the outbreak of the war, the CWB personnel grew to over 700 in 1946. By the beginning of the 1950's, the CWB was a much larger and very different organization than the one which had come into being in 1935. Today there are about 500 staff in Winnipeg, Vancouver, Tokyo and Beijing offices, including 18 Farm Business Representatives across the prairies.

The decade of the Fifties marked the return of the United States as a major exporter in the world grain market. During the Second World War, the U.S. had concentrated mainly on supplying its own domestic grain market. After the war, there were severe shortages of grain stocks in liberated counties around the world and the United States was unable to meet demand. At first, Canada filled the gap, but drought conditions reduced Canadian grain output from 1946-50, and a surge in world demand quickly depleted stocks.

In response to customers' wishes in the early 1960's, the CWB started making more sales directly to buyers, rather than through agents. At the same time, the Board started to enter into long-term supply or purchase agreements. The first major deal was a 2½-year long-term agreement signed with China in 1961. It called for three to five million long tons of wheat. This was followed by an even larger three-year long-term agreement with the Soviet Union in 1963.

While the CWB was a government agency for most of its history, its governance has changed recently. From 1935 until the end of 1998, the CWB was overseen and managed at the top by three to five federally appointed full-time Commissioners who acted collectively as its chief executive officer. In addition, there was an Advisory Committee of Prairie grain farmers, which had the function of bringing Prairie grain farmers' views to their marketing agency. The Advisory Committee was appointive until 1975, when it became elective. In that year as well, the first farmer accountability meetings were held to provide direct communication between CWB officials and Prairie farmers.

Then in 1998, in response to farmer pressure for the CWB to be more accountable to farmers, one of the most significant changes in the history of the CWB occurred. On December 31, 1998, a 15-member Board of Directors assumed overall governance responsibility for the CWB and a single full-time President and CEO was appointed. Ten of the members of the Board of Directors are elected by Prairie grain farmers and five of them, including the President and CEO, are appointed by the federal government. Under the new "shared governance" corporate structure the CWB is much more at arms' length from the federal government than it was previously and is more directly accountable to the farmers it serves.

The CWB has entered the 21st century with an established and impressive track record of providing world- class marketing services for Prairie wheat and barley producers.

[Jagfarms]

Incognito

Now you and everyone knows who I am who are you? I was not trying to hide under different name. If I did not want people to know who I was do you think I would go by the name Jagfarms.

[cropduster]

I`ll vouch for Incog JAG,he`s got good batteries on his farm!!!!!!!What a bunch of drivel............

[chaffmeister]

Not sure of the purpose of posting the history of the CWB (by the CWB) but since you did, I want to point out one little item.

Deliveries to the CWB became "mandatory" in 1943. The CWB had already guaranteed wheat to England at a fixed price. As the price rose above the guaranteed price to England, the CWB couldn't compete with the open market - their price was too low.

So - AND THIS IS IMPORTANT - to protect the government, it initiated the CWB monopoly, effectively shutting down the open market, forcing farmers to sell at the lower price the CWB established.

THIS IS ALSO IMPORTANT - THE CWB MONOPOLY WAS NOT ESTABLISHED TO GIVE FARMERS MARKET POWER AND HIGHER PRICES - IT WAS THERE TO GIVE ENGLAND CHEAP WHEAT AND SAVE GOVERNMENT MONEY BY DOING SO.

The CWB's piece that you posted concurs.

Is it right that the CWB now says that the monopoly is there to provide better prices?


Jag - still waiting for answers to my questions. Please tell me specifically how the CWB is good for you.

[TOM4CWB]

I give Jag, who are you?

The CWB gives part of the story... there is much more to be told!

When do we start "pooling" our trucking revenues Jag? I could use a few $$'s for new batteries!

[Incognito]

Why Jag?

u gonna send me a check for the increase in web traffic?

[Jagfarms]

parsley
Quote
1. Don't disparage your customers. They are the farmers who provide you with the cash for trucking and they deserve some loyalty.
3.You are obviously trying to disparage all the farmers wanting marketing choice by painting them as 'losers'. Unfortunately, that tactic reflects not upon them, but upon you. "
Unquote

I did not say all farmers that do not support the CWB are losers.

I said "There are a couple of big successful farmers in our area that do not care either way. " There are lots of other successful farmers that do not support the CWB in Western Canada but in the area where I am located I would say they mostly support the CWB.

Quote"2. Don't presume that fancy equipment always reflects financial viability. In Saskatchewan, the famers who are in the most dire straights are the big farmers. That is what my friends working in Farm Debt Review will tell you. "
unquote

I did not say nothing about fancy equipment I said " Everything is well organized the equipment is clean and well maintained" Myself I think some of the farmers that net the most money are still farming with discers and not burning everything off and using a bunch of chemical. They are the farmers that are still buying land paying thier bills and not puting all the money into fancy equipment.

Quote
3.You can disagree with someone's beliefs because they are Catholic whilst you are a Baptist. But disagree with the part of the scripture that you find egregious, don't pick on the guy's kids or his machinery or his house or his car, or his choices. In other words, keep the discussion to ideas.

It is ok for guys on this forum to cut down the CWB and everything about it but as soon as someone stands up for CWB that is not OK. I did not say any names of the farmers that I Know do not support the CWB or the guy that had battery trouble. I do not haul grain there anymore and he is lucky if anyone will as trucks do not make money unless the wheels are turning. He is no longer farming anymore.

Quote"4. And if you really want to have a discusion about the display of material wealth as an indication of a successful farmer, make sure that your finances are in order."

I never said that I was wealthy or I was right I just gave my opinion on the CWB and let out a bit of stress. My opinion is based on what I have seen the last few years and from talking to farmers. I did not say you have to agree with me if I was right or I was wrong I just wanted to express my opinion.

When someone cuts down the CWB I do not go and blast them. I like to read what they have to say and why they are saying it. Maybee they are right maybee I am wrong but let everyone has a right to thier opinion and let everyone decide for themselves. Maybee you can make me change my mind about the CWB maybee you will not.

I think with some changes the CWB could do a better job. How can they do a better job?