Don't like/want to be a lawyer but am still confused. The definition from the act is someone who produces grain which from my definition implys invests in costs and takes risk.
The definition from the election seems to be more who shows up on a permit book because of the accident/planning at the time it was filled out. That would create substantially different results eg. a husband/wife who are a partnership or joint venture would get 2 votes. The husband/wife (and perhaps others) who have equity/ownership in a corporation but only show one name on the permit book would only get one vote.
Given the first question in number 3, it would also appear easy to get a vote if you do not have a permit book but if your permit book was not filled out properly (listed the land already with names missing), then you are hooped.
The definition from the election seems to be more who shows up on a permit book because of the accident/planning at the time it was filled out. That would create substantially different results eg. a husband/wife who are a partnership or joint venture would get 2 votes. The husband/wife (and perhaps others) who have equity/ownership in a corporation but only show one name on the permit book would only get one vote.
Given the first question in number 3, it would also appear easy to get a vote if you do not have a permit book but if your permit book was not filled out properly (listed the land already with names missing), then you are hooped.
Comment