• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Plan "B" for Canada for Global Trade

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Plan "B" for Canada for Global Trade

    "11/16/2006
    Canada seeking ‘Plan B' for Global Trade

    Ottawa — Canada is accelerating a drive for international trade deals in the wake of collapsed global commerce liberalization talks, signing an agreement with Peru Tuesday and signalling it's keen on an Asia-Pacific free-trade zone if worldwide negotiations can't be revived.

    “For us, Plan B could well be an Asia-Pacific free-trade area,” International Trade Minister David Emerson told reporters during a telephone call from an Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation meeting in Hanoi.

    “The centre of economic gravity is shifting inexorably toward Asia.”

    He said the United States and Australia are enthusiastic backers of an APEC free-trade zone, adding that Canberra plans to lobby for the idea when it takes the helm of the 21-country body this year.

    APEC membership represents close to 50 per cent of world trade and the forum could serve as an alternative to World Trade Organization's Doha round of talks that fell apart in July if those negotiations cannot be restarted, Mr. Emerson said.

    “In Canada, we simply have to have a Plan B. We cannot sit back and assume that there will be a successful Doha round, although we are putting tremendous effort into making sure that there is a successful round,” Mr. Emerson said.

    Tuesday, Ottawa signed a foreign investor protection agreement with Peru, a measure that safeguards the rights of business in both countries. It's Canada's first FIPA in eight years and the first significant deal clinched since Ottawa signed a free-trade agreement with Costa Rica in 2001.

    Mr. Emerson said the Peruvian deal reflects the fact that Canadian investors have poured $2.3-billion into the South American country, adding that securing the legal rights of business should pave the way for more investment there.

    He said Ottawa is also talking with Peru, Colombia and Ecuador about launching full-fledged free-trade negotiations and hopes to resume stalled talks on a bilateral deal with Singapore next year.

    Mr. Emerson's push to secure access in markets around the globe is a change of pace for Ottawa, which previously focused on WTO talks — negotiations that collapsed after five years in July.

    While Canada only signed one trade deal in the past half decade, the U.S. has been busy sewing up special two-way deals. Congress has approved at least seven of them with 12 countries since 2001.

    Canada's new tack mirrors many other countries' as WTO talks lost momentum. Those negotiations show few serious signs of reviving before next summer, when U.S. President George W. Bush's fast-track authority expires.

    Marc Busch, a professor at Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service, said APEC members may find negotiating among 21 countries as difficult as WTO talks.

    “The bigger question is if Canada is able to negotiate something of substance with all these [APEC] countries — and all these other countries are willing to as well — why can't we all go back to the WTO talks in Geneva?” Prof. Busch said.

    APEC's business advisory council has urged member countries to consider a Pacific free-trade area during next week's summit.

    An APEC free-trade area, stretching from the U.S. to China and from Australia to Chile, would include 40 per cent of the world's population and 56 per cent of its gross domestic product.

    Source: STEVEN CHASE - Globe and Mail Update

    With files from the Associated Press"
    http://www.aacb.com/news/article.asp?ArticleID=3151

    What do you think Incognito?

    Looks like the Conservative MP's have been pounding the pavement!

    #2
    sorry hard to be excited - but everyone else has been on Plan B - 2 years ago - check bi-laterals that have been signed

    on the side, at least there is a Plan B now

    Comment


      #3
      The u.s is very good at free trade.To bad its horrible at FAIR trade.

      Anything south of texas is an economic basket case.Even mexico the richest of those countries just about elected a marxist.

      Comment


        #4
        Fact is Canada has very little to offer in terms of bilateral agreements. It is more of a position of asking a country to even up non-parity or reduction of tariffs with little compensation by Canada. The WTO talks were vital for ag in Canada, and it is almost certain that opportunity has passed. Cost to farmers in canola alone is $800 million per year.

        ie, we've got no cards at the poker table of world trade.

        Comment


          #5
          I agree on some items WD. Here is one you can throw into the hopper.

          If the economists suggest an $800 million benefit to CANADIANS - why was the CWB there fighting AGAINST the WTO.

          If you use the CWB value of $500 million to western Canadian farmers (I don't buy it, but whatever) - whose side of the ledger does the $300 million in lost opportunity go on?

          Comment


            #6
            We do have huge energy and mineral resource that the Cons are being allowed to be stolen. We also have water which may be the new Blue Gold of international trade. Unfortunately they have allowed some of our largest mineral companies to be sold to international interests and have destroyed energy trusts making them easy pickings for China or the U.S. Who would trust a country that changes its mind about international agreements because of a change of governments? If you don't like the agreement then you try negotiate changes, you don't reject it outright.

            Comment


              #7
              December 9 – 10, 2006 Ballots tabulated, and results announced (pending need for manual recount)

              21 days Agstar:

              Check the sports pages on December 15:

              Pro Choice wins 8-7 in overtime after Minister drafts 2 new directors and a NEW CEO.

              Measner Contacts Bob Clarke ex. GM of Philidealpha Flyers for advice

              Don Cherry: Clarke & Measner Couldn't Adapt to the Faster Game

              Measner accepts 2 year buyout package -
              Sent to the minors in the Ukraine with Pearson

              Pearson Tears Ligaments In Right Knee- Arrives Back to Alberta Capital with only One Boot

              11 million dollar facelift for CWB Arena on hold - Farmers say: Who voted for this?

              Strahl: When I Said Rebuild - I Didnt Mean 423 Main Street

              Comment


                #8
                sorry this was supposed to be a new thread

                Comment


                  #9
                  Agstar77,

                  You can find a way to blame everything on the COnservatives... NO doubt about it.

                  With a minority Parliament... to blame the Conservatives is like saying President GW Bush and Chretien caused the attack on the World Trade Centre.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Incognito, I don't have a recent calc for wheat, but it is at least 500 million. Yup, the CWB lobbied and sat bold face saying no WTO deal is the best deal for Cdn farmers.

                    On soapbox.

                    It forever drew a line in the sand that the profit for growers was not as important as the institution to remain intact.

                    The Cons Gov has said that while supply management is available for bargaining on trade, there has been no good answer as to why the guarantee and other grains 'cards' were given up for nothing in return.

                    I am all for fair trade but the G&O sector has been quite unfairly treated over the past years giving cards up and getting nothing in return. At least SM has been powerful enough to prevent that, whereas the G&O sector amidst the fighting with itself perhaps lost sight of the end goal - that is actually get something for what is given up.


                    The CWB may well be a 'domestic' decision by farmers, but trade and bargaining in terms of Canada's position will be lessened if we just vote to get rid of the CWB without making some advances in terms of trade.

                    I would hope all could agree on that 1 simple fact, quit giving stuff up and getting nothing in return because bilaterals in Canada will not work.

                    Off soapbox.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Goodale gave up the WGTA and agreed to do it immediately in trade for no concessions on SM...

                      Quebec was front and center in that debate as was their separation from the rest of Canada.

                      Funny how western farmers didn't vote to separate from the rest of Canada for grain marketing.

                      Goodale could have phased it out over 10 years but chose the SM card over western grain. And this is the guy the left side reveres.

                      Politics truly does make strange bedfellows...

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Your bang on agstar.Does anyone remember the day the tsx over took the dow jones,i do.Was that canadian money buying up those shares?I think not! Canada is now bought and paid for.Free trade is about access to our equity markets.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          This reminds me.Remember when the genius liberals sold petro-canada when oil was around 30$ a barrel!!!Or are gold reserves when it was 300$ an ounce!!ARRGGHH IDIOTS!

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...