• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Big Labor joins the fight to save the CWB

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Big Labor joins the fight to save the CWB

    Ok, so now the reason to save the CWB is so farmers need to be forced to support union jobs.

    This just makes me want to heave!

    NUPGE joins campaign to save the Canadian Wheat Board

    'Corporate agribusiness would dearly like
    to see the end of the CWB.' - James Clancy

    Ottawa (23 Nov. 2006) - The 340,000-member National Union of Public and General Employees is joining the campaign to save the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) and asking the Harper Conservative government not to dismantle the marketing agency as big-time agribusiness is demanding.

    The union is urging all Canadians who want orderly grain marketing maintained to add their voices to the campaign. The union is urging Canadians to add their voices to a new campaign launched by the National Farmers Union (NFU).

    The NFU is a non-partisan farm organization made up of thousands of members from across Canada. It promotes policies in the interests of family farms. The NFU has long been a strong supporter of marketing programs that maximize returns to farmers, especially the wheat board.

    The farmers union has started an internet-based campaign which allows all wheat board supporters to easily send a common message to Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl.

    Turning clock back to the 1930s

    "The Canadian Wheat Board Act must be respected and there can be no unilateral changes to the CWB by the Harper government," says NFU president Stewart Wells.

    "The true marketing advantage of the CWB is the single desk. By removing the single desk, the Harper Conservative plan gives Cargill Corporation and friends "market choice" – the choice to source grain in the disorganized Canadian market one day and from the Brazilians or U.S. the next, each time playing farmers in one nation against those in the other," Wells says.

    "The Harper government is intent on turning the clock back to the unsuccessful voluntary CWB of the 1930s. The Harper government is just recycling a failed, tired idea of the old Conservative government of R.B. Bennett."

    James Clancy

    In a letter to the federal agriculture minister, NUPGE president James Clancy says many NUPGE members live and work in western Canada and, along with thousands of other union members across Canada, are strong supporters of the board.

    "Our members everywhere are committed to ensuring Canada’s economy operates with maximum fairness, and protects the interests of individuals who must deal with the incredible power of large corporations," Clancy writes.

    "That is why we are completely opposed to the moves your government is making to deny Canada’s farmers the market protection they have had for decades through the CWB. We understand your government is responding to the continuing complaints of the U.S. government about the CWB’s grain marketing monopoly.

    "For years the U.S. government, through the WTO (World Trade Organization) and in other venues, has tried to eliminate the monopoly powers of the CWB. We also understand that corporate agribusiness would dearly like to see the end of the CWB."

    Praised by auditor-general

    Clancy said marketing boards in general help farmers deal with unbalanced markets, and the CWB is a prime example of their value. The agency is also run efficiently, according to a 2002 report by the federal auditor general. It returns 98% of revenue to farmers and adds over $2 million a day to the western farm economy.

    "The CWB is farmer-controlled and it acts as an agent for farmers: it sets a price, negotiates with the customers, arranges handling with the elevator companies, and delivery with one of the railways. The grain farmer then gets paid the world price for their grain. This arrangement also gives farmers bargaining power to negotiate freight and handling with the railways on the 350,000 or so grain cars shipped each year," he adds.

    "We have witnessed past attacks on the CWB, which were simply naked grabs for revenue by the private grain handling companies and the foreign-based flour millers. The only difference today is that the issue is being cloaked in the misleading rhetoric of freedom and choice," Clancy notes.

    "We want to add our voice to the voices of the thousands of farmers and their supporters who are calling for the retention of the Canadian Wheat Board. We are calling on your government to drop its plans to destroy this tool that has worked so effectively for our farmers for so many decades. And we are calling on you, as the Minister responsible for protecting the interests of Canadian farmers, to stand up to the US government and the interests of agribusiness by working to defend CWB, and the economic rights of Canada’s farmers." NUPGE

    #2
    Here’s a CWB quiz – multiple CHOICE (Oh, I love the irony of that….)


    Which of the following statements taken from the NUPGE release are incorrect?

    a) 'Corporate agribusiness would dearly like to see the end of the CWB.'

    b) The true marketing advantage of the CWB is the single desk.

    c) By removing the single desk, the Harper Conservative plan gives Cargill Corporation and friends "market choice" – the choice to source grain in the disorganized Canadian market one day and from the Brazilians or U.S. the next, each time playing farmers in one nation against those in the other”.

    d) It (the CWB) returns 98% of revenue to farmers and adds over $2 million a day to the western farm economy.

    e) The CWB …… arranges handling with the elevator companies, and delivery with one of the railways. The grain farmer then gets paid the world price for their grain.

    f) We have witnessed past attacks on the CWB, which were simply naked grabs for revenue by the private grain handling companies and the foreign-based flour millers. The only difference today is that the issue is being cloaked in the misleading rhetoric of freedom and choice.

    g) ……this tool (the CWB) that has worked so effectively for our farmers for so many decades.

    h) All of the above.


    First one posting with the correct answer gets a no-cost export licence to the destination of their CHOICE.

    Comment


      #3
      I'll take H Alex!

      and now its time for ....

      Deal or no Deal.

      over to you Howie!

      Comment


        #4
        Incognito wins!

        Now, Inc, where do you want to export to? What's your CHOICE!

        Oh, but I forgot to tell you, whatever you export using your no-cost export licence, you have to ship from Ontario.....

        Comment


          #5
          Chaffmeister,

          A shipment from Creston B.C. would be much closer and easier.

          But then I forgot...

          Incognito could get a no-cost export license for:

          Manufactured Feed from anywhere in the "designated area".

          Pedigreed Seed from anywhere in the "designated area"

          Oh yes... if he did a DPC according to Allan Oberg/Adrian Measner he would be just fine as well!

          Etheopian Barley seems to be just fine;

          As does Einkorn!


          SO

          Incognito... another multiple choice question... which one of these monopoly products requires a buyback for the pool?

          Comment


            #6
            Can we also please pole the Newfie's and all the Eskimos in the North. The fact that we allow interested parties to vote in CWB elections should mean we should make an effort to include everyone. In fact why not include the plebiscite as part of the next federal election. If the vote is in favor of maintaining the CWB then we could officially make it nation wide. If it is such a good deal then we should be willing to share. Maybe we can bargain that instead of a bigger share of oil revenues.

            Comment


              #7
              Craig;

              I just might be able to dream up a legal argument to back up your request!

              Since a vote of all "producers" is required... obviously this is in the "Regulation of Trade and Commerce" 91(3) of the Consitution Act 1867.

              The "producer" is the Canadian economy, not specifically just the grower of the grain.

              Therefore you are well within your legal right to request all citizens vote on this issue!

              47.1 ...unless,
              a) the minister has consulted with the board about the exclusion or extention; and

              b) the producers of the grain have voted in favour of the exclusion or extention, the voting process having been determined by the Minister.

              The french version of "producer"

              "In addition to the producer-operator, any person having right, by title of landowner, vendor, or mortgage holder to all or part of the grains grown by this one(producer-operator)."

              A strong argument could be made that the people of Canada are the vendor... as the legislation uses elevators that are "Works for the General advantage of Canada" and the quality is determined by the "Grades for the General advantage of Canada".

              "Vendor" means:

              Seller,
              Salesman,
              Trader,
              Retailer,
              Merchant,
              Wholesaler
              Hawker...

              By George... I think Craig has got something HERE!

              Comment

              • Reply to this Thread
              • Return to Topic List
              Working...