AdamSmith,
The CWB itself is creating the uncertainty.
If the CWB would be part of the transition team... and negotiate in good faith... no customer would even have cause to question the delivery of products they would like to purchase.
On the other hand... if the CWB wants to go into a 3 year supply agreement to tie up my wheat... I object.
The CWB has no right to any wheat or barley unless it has been offered to the CWB under section 32 of the CWB Act.
This extends only to "A" series 2006 contracts. According to the CWB offer to only accept 80% of this series... the CWB has ample supply to meet all of their customer needs for CWRS and Durum.
Obviuosly the CWB is blowing smoke.
The CWB itself is creating the uncertainty.
If the CWB would be part of the transition team... and negotiate in good faith... no customer would even have cause to question the delivery of products they would like to purchase.
On the other hand... if the CWB wants to go into a 3 year supply agreement to tie up my wheat... I object.
The CWB has no right to any wheat or barley unless it has been offered to the CWB under section 32 of the CWB Act.
This extends only to "A" series 2006 contracts. According to the CWB offer to only accept 80% of this series... the CWB has ample supply to meet all of their customer needs for CWRS and Durum.
Obviuosly the CWB is blowing smoke.
Comment