• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CWB now a part of Freedom of Information

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    CWB now a part of Freedom of Information

    Accountability Act clears final Senate hurdle, royal assent expected next week

    BRUCE CHEADLE

    OTTAWA (CP) - The Conservative government's showpiece accountability legislation has finally cleared the Senate and been returned to the House of Commons.

    With all-party support in Parliament, the sweeping act is expected to be swiftly passed into law before the Commons rises for the winter recess next week.






    The Accountability Act met some resistance in the Liberal-dominated upper chamber, where senators proposed some 150 amendments after weeks of hearings this fall.

    That led Treasury Board President John Baird to repeatedly charge that the unelected Senate was stalling the legislation and thwarting the will of Parliament.

    Ultimately, some 90 of those Senate amendments were included in the final legislation that went to the Commons on Thursday.

    "I felt that this was as much as we could get at this stage," said Liberal Senator Joseph Day.

    "This justifies the work that we've done. We've been vindicated."

    The bill is expected to get royal assent as early as next Tuesday.

    Many of the accepted amendments simply clean up sloppy drafting in a hastily drafted bill that swiftly cleared the Commons last spring.

    Others amendments - despite actually beefing up the legislation - were deemed offside by the Conservatives, who campaigned on improved government accountability as a response to the sponsorship scandal.

    For instance, the Senate failed in its bid to raise the amount of legal costs the government will cover for whistleblowers, which the act sets at $1,500.

    Day said that's not enough to "open a file" at a lawyer's office and wanted the limit raised to $25,000.

    Senators also failed in their bid to reduce the large number of exemptions the government can use to shield documents under the Access to Information Act.

    The upper chamber wanted to keep the Canadian Wheat Board exempt from access-to-information requests, but Day said that was a non-starter in the current super-charged political atmosphere surrounding the grain marketing monopoly.

    One significant Senate proposal that was accepted was the removal from the act of a single ethics commissioner for both Houses of parliament. That clause has been dropped, meaning the status quo will continue.

    #2
    The upper chamber wanted to keep the Canadian Wheat Board exempt from access-to-information requests, but Day said that was a non-starter in the current super-charged political atmosphere surrounding the grain marketing monopoly.

    SCORE ONE FOR THE GOOD GUYS!


    HMMM, NOW LET'S SEE, WHAT DO I WANT TO PUT ON MY CHRISTMAS WISH LIST?

    Comment


      #3
      While I would agree that this is good news what does this really mean. What imformation will be available( CWB) and how to we access this information.

      Comment


        #4
        I don't see any good guys.

        Comment


          #5
          If there is nothing to hide, then what is the problem?

          The first thing to check might be the number of paper shredders purchased since January.

          Comment


            #6
            Looks and smells like a ENRON. Staff is putting in overtime shredding all documents.

            Comment


              #7
              Canada Post , Via Rail, EDC and Public sector pension investment board were given extra protection from the act . How come? The CWB, a non governmental agency was not.

              Comment


                #8
                agstar, there is absolutely no reason why there should not be transparency.

                For example, the Minister can give orders to the CWB and farmers need to be able to access information that will shed light on dealing with those orders.

                Another example agstar, the CWB worked out a secret little deal with the big feed mills to allow the feed mills to bypass Board marketing and Board pooling. Secret. No farmers were told.

                Any single-desker in his right mind would want it exposed that the CWB were allowing the big mills to buy directly from the farmer and bypassing the Board and export what the farmer himself could not!

                REAL single-desk committants would have publically opposed the CWB creating the Export Manufactured Feed Agreement export licenses which legally allow the CWB to allow the big mills to bypass pooling.

                And I want to find out who the Director was that made the motion to create the EMFA. Was he a single-desk Director? Is that Director still serving on the Board? As such an avid single desk supporter, I am sure you will be intolerant of such a hypocrite, too.

                There should be absolutely NO reason why the CWB should not be open and willing to be transparent to farmers.

                Parsley

                Comment


                  #9
                  Transparency is good as long as it does not involve commercially sensitive material. The government should pay for the extra work to satisfy any of the requests.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    i'd like to see liberal party donations, especially compared to other parties.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      agstar, I'm glad that you are starting to see that costs are an important issue for farmers; then you will agree that the Federal Government should pay the cost of national licensing, just as the Act requires them.

                      Parsley

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Costs are important , that's why I'd rather see a 250 thousand ceo for the CWB than a 1 million Ceo at a CWB II. How long would farmers tolerate that?

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...