• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

market manipulation glyphosate

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    NEWS RELEASE
    for immediate release December 15, 2006

    OUI Task Force sees Opportunities for Producers

    (OTTAWA) - Pulse Canada, Canadian Hort Council and the Grain Growers of
    Canada, today announced that the Own Use Imports (OUI) Task Force is rapidly
    closing in on final proposals to harmonize a number of Canadian and American
    pesticide rules and regulations.

    "All aspects of our industry, from producers to manufacturers have been
    working on solving our differences and we are pleased at the progress to
    date," said Gordon Bacon. "As producers we want to see the both a fair price
    discovery mechanism and yet incentives for the industry to want to register
    new products and new uses in Canada."

    The OUI Task Force met recently in Ottawa to evaluate and further develop
    new ideas for own use importations, registration of generics, and the
    creation of product labels that would apply jointly in Canada, the US and
    Mexico. (NAFTA)

    Eight active ingredients (as well as two newly proposed ingredients) have
    been proposed for NAFTA labeling. Once implemented, cross-border shopping
    without the need for permits will be possible. Our grower organizations
    created the short list of needed chemicals which would provide needed cost
    savings to producers.

    A new generics system has been proposed for Canada by 2008. If this system
    functions well, Canadian farmers could have a rapid registration system for
    generics that satisfies the need for price discipline. This is a dramatic
    improvement over the system currently available.

    The Pest Management Regulatory Agency has volunteered to accept and review
    US data on a pilot basis on 72 actives; also known as Project 914. If this
    program proves workable, over 200 minor-uses could follow in the coming
    years.

    'It is important that we see this process through to the finish," said
    Gordon Bacon, CEO of Pulse Canada. "I think all of us on the Task Force have
    worked proactively to come to solutions for the overall good of the
    agricultural industry in Canada, and I would like to recognize Crop Life for
    moving a fair ways towards the interests of the farmers."

    "There is a lot of opportunity out there for Canadian producers to have
    access to more and better products to help them in their farming operations
    and the issues we are resolving will take us a long way down that road to
    being competitive within our North American marketplace," said Richard
    Phillips, Executive Director of the Grain Growers of Canada.

    -30-
    Contact:
    Gordon Bacon Craig Hunter Richard
    Phillips
    Pulse Canada Canadian Hort Council Grain Growers of
    Canada
    204-925-4452 519-831-5866 613-875-1795

    Comment


      #17
      wow were are harmonizeing our rules with the amercians


      what about the rest of the world


      how about allowing chinnese companies ( that are willing to pay their share of compensation for data, regestration costs) into the market.

      why under grou should a generic man. have to be affiliated with the current licence holder and manufactured in north amercia.

      thats like saying you cant buy a toyota unless its built in N amer. and GM says you can.

      whats the problem, I thought the majority of the posters on this site were in favor of free enterprise and an open market. i guess not .

      sounds like the pluse growers, and the grain growers (whose ever mouth peice they are) have sold the farmer out!

      Comment


        #18
        Sawfly,better reread the piece.....Doesn`t talk about groui,it`s talking about oui.

        Comment


          #19
          Ok let me get this straight.
          -CWB monopoly bad
          -Monsanto monopoly on glyphosate ingredient bad
          -Syngenta's pantent on Acheive ends, new patent on Axial Bad.
          -Cargill, ADM bad
          hmmmm. only difference is CWB is a farmer monopoly. Maybe there is a good point here. Work at distmantling the non farmer monopolies and work to improve the farmer monopolies.
          Industry works to keep there monopoly through patents to extract as much as they can from farmers. With colaboration and cooperation this should be the same with the CWB?..right?..
          I think your discussion thread has just pointed out something....Monopolies do work. Now why wouldn't we just fix ours instead of distroying it. OH YEAH,...farmers can't agree on anything..and it is my god given right to do what I want.

          SHEESH guys...you complain about the monopolies both ways. sounds like a case of anti bi-monopoly.

          Comment


            #20
            Where do you get the load about the CWB being a farmer monopoly??Love`m or hate`m, Strahl just PROVED ,it`s NOT a farmer monopoly.If it was, why didn`t/don`t the BOD of the CWB overrule Strahl and replace Measner.What don`t you understand????????

            Comment


              #21
              Strahl can also be replaced. Today may make it quicker.

              Comment


                #22
                Access to chemicals can only occur if registration is the same way for new as is for generics. Doing it any other way, by bypassing steps of registration, or assuming free access to data is not the way to do it.

                Be it a corporation or a single person, the rules and commerce of registration must be science based and follow existing rules of ownership of products and data and compensation for either must be observed.

                Generics - which is why they are generics - no longer have protections of a patent so the rules of data ownership apply. Something OUI never took into account.

                Comment


                  #23
                  a judge or any one with a calculator,should be able to calculate compensation for regestration and data set costs,
                  add the 2 and divide by the number of units, grams , liters etc. sold by the licience holder and thier affiliates since the patent was granted.

                  thats the fee. and anyone from anywhere that pays the fee can sell the product.


                  anything less than this access is simply a non tarrif trade barrier that gifts 100s of millions to the chem co.s at farmers expense.

                  while the ag minister dismantles the CWB in the name of market freedom.
                  at the same time the govt. lets the chem companies write the rules to keep out any real competition.
                  allowing them to maintain supply management on off patent products.

                  can you imangine this happening with any other product that was patented.
                  Thomas edisons decendents would still control or licence every light bulb sold in northamercia

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...