• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Natural Gas and Feed Wheat and Barley

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Rockpile,

    Sorry you feel we are always negative, but you know if I really love someone, and care about them, if they are bleeding to death and don't realize it, won't I try my hardest to get their attention?

    If I didn't care, wouldn't I just take the system and pooling accounts for all I could and pad my bank account?

    Would I spend all this time trying to explain that we must change our ways, if I was did not care and want a better system for my childern to farm in in the future?

    I sincerely hope you change your mind rockpile, but if you need to get ready for spring seeding and get some work done, I certainly understand!!!

    Comment


      #32
      Rockpile,

      your statement...." because once you do, there is no going back".....what do you base this little "statement of fact' upon?

      Parsley

      Comment


        #33
        One last parting shot,
        To Tom4 and Parsley - Tom, you grab the sword and carry on the fight for those bleeding, and attack the monster Wheat Board. But, if you really take note of the bloodletting, look at the dismal returns on non-board grains. What are you doing for us there? Rye used to be a sound part of my rotation, but the grain companies turned it into compost, due to their lack of marketing effort. To Parsley, two obvious facts - 1. Nafta, and 2, the inablilty of some who are wrong to ever have the courage to admit that they made a mistake. Take your pick. Couldn't resist the parting shot. I think we have all over-occupied this forum.
        Rockpile

        Comment


          #34
          Rockpile,

          I don't blame you for being bitter about the non-board market!

          Feed wheat and barley clearly affect the value of rye.

          As a whole we do not grow enough rye ot triticale to do anything more than blend it with our wheat.

          There are some innovative marketers that are actually selling rye into feed markets this year at barley value.

          It can be done if a reasonable volume is avaliable to set up a marketing program.

          The bleeding is occuring, but my idea was to sew up the wound and stop the bleeding, not make it worse.

          I guess some say it is infected and we need an amputation so as to not have the infection kill the CWB.

          Rockpile, I guess it is up to us if we try to save the CWB, or allow it to get sicker and in worse shape.

          Would you help me save the patient, or do you just want the CWB to die?

          Comment


            #35
            Rockpile, I'll pick NAFTA.

            You've been listening to Goodale and the CWB bureaucrats. In our experience, They will give you information that reflects what they want you to believe, but it is not necessarily accurate.

            This is an actual quote from NAFTA ..... about monopolies or if you like, state enterprises:

            "Article 1503: State Enterprises

            1. Nothing in this agreement should be construed to prevent a party from maintaining or establishing a state enterprise."


            "Article 1502: Monopolies and State Enterprises

            1. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent a Party from designating a monopoly."

            It's pretty clear, Rockpile.

            We are not enemies. Remember, we are both farmers and generally, we both want and need the same things...... Paying bills, educating our children......we need to work to attain those things.... together, Rockpile,... but we have to move forward based on facts, not on propoganda put out by the CWB. They are masters at divide and conquer.

            Farming is a wonderful, wonderful life. Let's work to keep it that way
            Parsley




            Comment


              #36
              Rockpile

              I see your comment on rye so I thought I might comment. I would include triticale in this question as well.

              The rye market has been dying for a while. The main markets for rye are:

              1) Export market with emphasis on Japan. Declining use in this market (replaced by other feed grains)/highly subsidized European supplies have basically taken us out of this market. This is a low price market anyway.

              2) Distilling - limited market with my understanding Agricore is the main supplier.

              3) Milling rye - again a small market. I do my best to eat rye bread but not a major part of flour market.

              4) US market - again a small market with our SK. and MB. neighbors having a major freight advantage. Again, a stable to declining market volume wise.

              5) For whatever reason (I will let others comment), our feed industry will only put rye in rations if it is cheap.

              6) Blending grain with wheat.

              Are there other markets for rye? Ethanol production?

              Just to raise your question about grain companies not doing market development on rye. Market development is expensive so grain companies will only get involved if they see profit at the end of the tunnel so to speak. Maybe to ask the question whose responsibility should market development be? What role should farm managers play in this process? Can farm managers grow crops without a clear vision of customer needs/a process to clearly highlight how our products meet these needs?

              Comment


                #37
                Ycharliep, you say, "Market development is expensive"
                Yes it is charliep. At the presenrt time, farmers have check-off.....countless checkoffs.....flax checkoff, cattle checkoff, Western Grains checkoff, and on and on.....I would be very interested to find the amount of total checkoff dollars the producer 'invests' every year in market development. Could you do that?

                You also ask, " whose responsibility should market development be?"

                Farmers have increasingly been asked to foot the bill for agricultural research because governments are broke!

                Vernon Clifford Fowke makes the following observations in his book, The National Policy and the Wheat Economy:

                "There is little need to justify the use of taxpayers' dollars for the support of research directed toward the reduction in food costs. To charge the agricultural research budget of the government to the account of the agricultural producer is, however, scarcely legitimate."

                Barry Wilson writes in his book, Beyond the Harvest, Canadian Grain at the Crossroads, the following:

                "Consumers receive the benefit of food, while farmers often find the financial rewards which should flow from this improvement are lost in the marketplace."

                Perhaps farmers need to review:
                1. How much farmers invest
                2. What we do with what we develop
                Thoughts?
                Parsley

                Comment


                  #38
                  I can do some research on producer contributions to research via checkoffs. Give me to the end of next week as I am in Oyen/area last half of the week and Peace River early next. I will leave other discussion to others for the moment.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Charlie,

                    Innovation and market development are very tricky areas to promote.

                    The sensitivity to know when a certain idea is a good one requires execeptional wisdom and savy.

                    I know some folks at the CWB are inteligent and wise, but actually putting your own farm and life on the line is different than collecting a wage.

                    This is why the CWB can say, and to some extent help market development, but this needs to be a facilitation role, rather than a top down comand position.

                    Using the pooling accounts to mask reality is a big gamble, and like with CPS White, if the market will not pay a reasonable value for a specialty product, why grow it?

                    By segmenting our production and trying to become a "grocery store" supplyer, are we doing ourselves more harm than good?

                    Specialization increases the knowlege needed to provide the best quality, in a sustainable volume that will supply the market place dependably.

                    If we don't do this for all of the products we produce, How will we acheive premium prices for the substandard products we produce?

                    Isn't knowing our limitations realistically the base to putting resources in the most productive places, and therefore acheiving the best possible results?

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Just a request for some clarification about discussion you are wanting to start Tom.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...