1. This discussion was never about whether emmissions should decrease. Of course they should, cottonpickin. This discussion is about how best to do it. That being said:
1.Could we agree that the Kyoto approach resulted in unacceptable emmissions?
2. If Al Gore represents the voice of environmentalists, then he shouldn't claim emmissions/pollution 'alters the balance of energy between our planet and the rest of the universe', because scientists/folks start to say,really, I didn't know that, show me the studies.
There are no studies showing the relationship between energy and the galaxies,/planets etc.
Gore uses stupid hype in his presentations and that results in a lack of credibility.
3. You live in Saskatchewan, if I recall. What suggestions do you have about SaskPower as the #3 polluter in Canada?
4.Stephane Dion had the environment portfolio and he did nothing.
5. What new direction would you like cottonpickin/Sasktatchewan/Canada heading for? If you feel so strongly cottonpickin, you should do more than piss and shout.
Parsley
1.Could we agree that the Kyoto approach resulted in unacceptable emmissions?
2. If Al Gore represents the voice of environmentalists, then he shouldn't claim emmissions/pollution 'alters the balance of energy between our planet and the rest of the universe', because scientists/folks start to say,really, I didn't know that, show me the studies.
There are no studies showing the relationship between energy and the galaxies,/planets etc.
Gore uses stupid hype in his presentations and that results in a lack of credibility.
3. You live in Saskatchewan, if I recall. What suggestions do you have about SaskPower as the #3 polluter in Canada?
4.Stephane Dion had the environment portfolio and he did nothing.
5. What new direction would you like cottonpickin/Sasktatchewan/Canada heading for? If you feel so strongly cottonpickin, you should do more than piss and shout.
Parsley
Comment