KYOTO again

[cottonpicken]

Parsly you are an idiot.
99% of all scientists believe what gore is trying to explain.
There is no debate about it.
You havent even watched the documentry and you are bashing it.
Get your head out of your ass.
You are really a dumb person.

[FarmRanger]

Classy.

If someone tries to have a serious debate you don’t argue against their position. You attack their person. You don’t listen to any evidence that contradicts your preconceived notions, and you’re admittedly not alone in that.

“There is no debate about it”
- Let’s all goosestep, silence the unbelievers.

You seriously think that is a good thing???
cottenpicken, if your nasty attacks are successful in driving away everyone who disagrees with you, Agriville won’t be worth reading anymore.

[wedino]

Who's the idiot Cottenpicken? $12 new crop canola, $20 wheat, Canadian $ at par. Give me a break!!

[cottonpicken]

Nobody has to read what i post.
The issue is far to important for me to let it slide.
Maybe a little shock value will perswade people to go out rent the movie and then make a comment.

How can i debate someone about gores movie-who hasnt watched the movie but still makes up arguements?
Idiotic is the tamest word im thinking.

[cottonpicken]

Wedino-who seen 4 dollar corn?

[TOM4CWB]

Wedino,

I wouldn't bet against CP on grain prices right now... China woke up, India has many hungry mouths to feed... if we get a production shortfall... it will drive markets loopy.

We are now in the energy age... and grains will equalise with oil in value at some point.

This should be the real point of Kyoto... we need a balance in the way it is implemented.

[parsley]

Can you cite a convincing response, cottonpickin, or do you just need to indulge in your usual daily nasty-tantrum?

I am not suggesting that North American leaders act as "les rois faineants" (do nothing kings), but have you looked at Kyoto's record:

1. Kyoto was negotiated in 1997.

2. At that time the Chretien Government committed to reducing Canada's emmissions.

3. The stated goal was to reduce emmissions 6% BELOW the 1990 levels, and this was to be done by 2012.

4. By 2005, under the same Government, Canada's emmissions had actually increased by 24%.

Read that again cottonpickin,

Increased by 24% in 2005.

So asking, how effective was Kyoto,and is the process doable, becomes a legitimate question.

Couple that with Kyoto's operationl scheme to transfer carbon-credit wealth to third world countries, when it could be said that keeping that wealth in-country would not only benefit Canadians, but the less-emissions goals as well, so I think there is room for questioning.

FYI: Nor did I say 'I did or did not' watch the documentary.

You can be so much more, if you could just step back and listen to yourself.

We need all farmers cottonpickin, but your snarling makes it more difficult to entertain or value your ideas.

Parsley

[cottonpicken]

Parsly reread your post about gore.
Watch the movie and THEN tell me what you think.
Gore does not portray himself as a know it all scientist.

China is putting up one coal fired power plant every week.They have HUGE coal reserves.
The clever ALBERTANS have decided to go after coal bed methane gas.
29,000 POOR CHILDREN die needlessly every single day.

Ill let you connect the dots.

We have a large problem on our hands.

Were about to face even more severe consiquences.

If your not going to pull your own weight then somebody else will have to do it for you.BECAUSE this is all our problem.

[parsley]

cottonpicken, let's follow written on this thread.

1.You queried:

"Anybody take the time to watch the documentry."


2.I thought I'd better verify (maybe you were referring to orangutangs):

"Gore's documentary, right? "

3. and then I referenced Steyn, on the point he made; being, that Gore(not me) claims we are :

"altering the balance of energy between our planet and the rest of the universe".

It was his point/thought/idea, and I properly credited him with it, but I will list his book, so you can better check:

p.xxiii from America Alone, The end of the World as we know it", written by Mark Steyn and published by RegneryPublishing Corp. $34.95

I'll quote a short passage from him directly:

QUOTE
The "balance of energy" between earth and "the rest of the universe"? You wouldn't happen to have the statistical evidence for that, would you? Universal "balance of energy" graphs for 1940 and 1873? Heigh-ho"
UNQUOTE

5.I simply cannot locate where I said or did not say I saw the documentary.

6. FYI
#1 polluter in Canada is Ontario Hydro.

#3 polluter in Canada is Saskatchewan Power Corporation.

7.I've documented my dots.

8. Our farm has made significant environmental changes, but we can alwys learn more.

What exactly can you offer in the way of constructive environmental policy, other than ranting and accusations?

Since you completely ignored the 24% increase in emmissions since 2005, I presume your problem-solving entails more of the same.

Parsley

[cottonpicken]

Parsly i feel like im banging my head against a wall.
Global warming is a fact
Co2 causes it-fact
Humans create massive amounts of co2-fact.
There are co2 measurements going back 650,000 years-fact
The worlds scientists are not argueing about if there is or isnt global warming-fact
The worlds scientists are not argueing about what is causing the warming-fact
There is a massive disinformation campaign going on that you and many others have been suckered into believing-fact
You have not watched the movie -fact

You are believing a lie.
If you dont believe in global warming why do you keep bringing up canadas emmissions problems?
Of course the liberal bone heads screwed up.
What does the balance of the energy in the universe have to do with anything?
emmissions growth curve is now exponetially growing.