• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Carbon Credits

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kamichel
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 631

    Carbon Credits

    Just wondering what other farmers are thinking about carbon credits. I for one am in dissagreement for the selling of carbon credits. For once us min till farmers have the environment going for us only to sell CO2 for 4 dollars per ton.
    4 dollars seems a little too low since if one compares to Fertilizer 500 per ton. Canola to 352 per ton. How can CO2 be only worth 4 dollars per ton. Just my thinking. Would like some other farmers thinking on this issue.
  • kamichel
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 631

    #2
    Just that most people I have talked to figure to just take the money and run.

    Comment

    • parsley
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2000
      • 10986

      #3
      Rent them out?

      Comment

      • carebear300
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2002
        • 630

        #4
        I agree with you, it does sound way to cheap and I am just stubborn enough to wait for at least twice as much. After I say that I will likely wait too long and get nothing but if I am going to sign up I want some serious coin not chicken feed.

        Comment

        • kamichel
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 631

          #5
          Have you guys not heard about it. It is about CO2 stored in min tilled soil as a carbon sink. We had a meeting in Leroy Sask. about it and anyone that wanted to sign up acres could do so. you can be creditted .4 ton per acre of CO2 over the past 4 years worth 4 dollars per ton. Then also a contract for the next 4 years at .4 ton per acre at 4 dollars per ton. So if one farmed 2500 acres you could sell 8000 tons of C02 for 32000 dollars. It just does not seem right to me is the reason for the post.
          As far as I am concerned the Carbon sink is only good for so many years and then one would be at the maximum. The big boys at the meeting did not seem to think there was a max. that the soil could hold. So back to the , I think we are being duped.

          Comment

          • cropduster
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2001
            • 666

            #6
            Was this C-green Aggregators Ltd?Sounds like the rate is too low.Still can`t believe it either!

            Comment

            • kamichel
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2007
              • 631

              #7
              Yes C-Green as the trader and Sask. Crop Ins. as the verifier in Sask.

              Comment

              • tower
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2004
                • 271

                #8
                If the brokers can get tonnes that cheap they will certainly take them. It looks like an attempt to get some people in early with what looks like a significant amount of money. Once some have accepted it, it's always harder to push for a higher number.

                Was there any justification given for the $4/tonne?

                Comment

                • Vader
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2001
                  • 689

                  #9
                  If you accept $32,000.00 are you liable? Can you be made to pay it back some day if conditions change?

                  You are storing the CO2. If you need to till the soil and the CO2 gets away you may be forced to give the money back.

                  If this is the case and there is an ongoing liability, there should be some ongoing compensation.

                  It would be a better system if rather than being paid to "own" the carbon we should be paid for "storage" on an annual basis. The more you store each year the higher your rent payment. If you till the soil and your storage goes down your rent would also go down but you would not be asked to give the money back.

                  Comment

                  • Braveheart
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2001
                    • 3257

                    #10
                    Sask Power offered 5$/ton back in 1999. This would have been annually. Estimated 1 ton per acre per year carbon stored with no-till/0-till. The contract was a lengthy (can't remember but like 20 years?). We turned it down because of uncertainty over the long term and what carbon was worth then and in the future.

                    The Canadian Climate Exchange at the WCE was formed to trade carbon should Kyoto take hold. This would have allowed price discovery and trading of credits but then Kyoto stalled out.

                    On carbon, how many credits are created when a wind tower is built? The wind companies don't share any of those with the landowners to my knowledge and they must be huge.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...