The elected single-deskettes always claim they they owe a duty of care to farmers.
But when the CWB(the defendent in this case) wants to beat the hell out of a farmer in the courtroom, they plead they have no duty of care to the farmer:
http://www.canlii.org/mb/cas/mbca/1997/1997mbca49.html
plaintiffs are the farmers
defendant is the CWB
QUOTE
The defendant says the plaintiffs have no legal right to proceed in an action of this kind and that the Board is only responsible to the Minister and ultimately to Parliament and there is no legal duty to the plaintiffs since there is no duty imposed on the Board under the statute that would permit an action of this kind.
UNQUOTE
You got that you schmooky, weasly little farmers?
Quote
While it is regrettable that a group of producers such as the class that grows and sells barley to the Board under the compulsory terms of the Canadian Wheat Board Act should not have recourse in the Courts that would permit them to ascertain in the trial of an action for an accounting, the exact state of affairs in the Board’s operations and whether in fact the plaintiffs have been treated fairly, or may have a legitimate complaint by reason of the actions of the Board, nevertheless, in the view I take of this statute the responsibility is not to any individual producers but rather to the Minister under the Act and finally to Parliament.
As I can find no authority for a class action of this kind that would require such an accounting, the action is dismissed with costs.
UNQUOTE
charliep, how did Alberta completely rid the province of rodents? I want to take a look at that.
Parsley
But when the CWB(the defendent in this case) wants to beat the hell out of a farmer in the courtroom, they plead they have no duty of care to the farmer:
http://www.canlii.org/mb/cas/mbca/1997/1997mbca49.html
plaintiffs are the farmers
defendant is the CWB
QUOTE
The defendant says the plaintiffs have no legal right to proceed in an action of this kind and that the Board is only responsible to the Minister and ultimately to Parliament and there is no legal duty to the plaintiffs since there is no duty imposed on the Board under the statute that would permit an action of this kind.
UNQUOTE
You got that you schmooky, weasly little farmers?
Quote
While it is regrettable that a group of producers such as the class that grows and sells barley to the Board under the compulsory terms of the Canadian Wheat Board Act should not have recourse in the Courts that would permit them to ascertain in the trial of an action for an accounting, the exact state of affairs in the Board’s operations and whether in fact the plaintiffs have been treated fairly, or may have a legitimate complaint by reason of the actions of the Board, nevertheless, in the view I take of this statute the responsibility is not to any individual producers but rather to the Minister under the Act and finally to Parliament.
As I can find no authority for a class action of this kind that would require such an accounting, the action is dismissed with costs.
UNQUOTE
charliep, how did Alberta completely rid the province of rodents? I want to take a look at that.
Parsley
Comment