Reason for the above question is I went through the 2005 references and of the 5 pages referenced, only 8 of the articles were dated after 2000. Rest were mostly mid 1980s and 1990s. The price data used only goes to the 2002/03 crop year. Only other new material was the piece reviewing the Sparks barley study (from which it borrowed from heavily). Interesting the wording in the reference section citing this study uses the following wording:
Schmitz, Gray, Schmitz (2005)study prepared for the CWB. Winnipeg (page 97). Same wording as the Sparks study indicating both are paid for consulting studies.
I would argue (you may disagree) that the structure of the barley market has changed significantly over the past 10 and perhaps just as much in the past. Change in MOP, drought, increase in domestic malting capacity, increasing livestock numbers, increasing competition for acres from other crops, bio fuels, etc. In the new world, can you look at the barley market with the view as in the mid 1990s?
Schmitz, Gray, Schmitz (2005)study prepared for the CWB. Winnipeg (page 97). Same wording as the Sparks study indicating both are paid for consulting studies.
I would argue (you may disagree) that the structure of the barley market has changed significantly over the past 10 and perhaps just as much in the past. Change in MOP, drought, increase in domestic malting capacity, increasing livestock numbers, increasing competition for acres from other crops, bio fuels, etc. In the new world, can you look at the barley market with the view as in the mid 1990s?
Comment