• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This is something every single farmer in Canada and the World should watch!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Thats not something every farmer needs to watch. Every farmer already knows we are producing more with less than ever before. Everyone else other than farmers need to watch that especially the climate change cultists.
    Last edited by biglentil; Jan 11, 2024, 15:50.

    Comment


      #32
      Chuck must be very young if he can’t remember any hot summers other than last summer!
      My Grandfather told me all about 1937. My Dad told me all about 1961.
      I got married in 1988 and the temps that spring and summer still hold records. 2002 was a scorcher all spring and summer with records that still stand. Some late summer and fall temp in 01,02 and 03 were extremely hot.
      I just have to look at all the leaf cutter bee nests to know last summer wasn’t the warmest.
      Last edited by seldomseen; Jan 11, 2024, 17:35.

      Comment


        #33
        The record world temperature is based on average annual global surface temperature records.

        Several world class scientific organizations have confirmed the record.

        They are not single season or single day records from a specific location or region.

        Your family stories and experience from where ever you live, are not relevant or comparable to analyzing global temperatures from thousands of sites over many decades.

        Comment


          #34
          What Chuck is saying is don't trust your own eyes and experiences. Instead "Trust the $cience" cult. "You must eat zee bugz paste!"
          Last edited by biglentil; Jan 12, 2024, 08:33.

          Comment


            #35
            -41 everywhere here but in the city
            says -35 .
            was the same yesterday when leaving Stoon . -27 in city , -30 outside city .
            so what’s the “official” temp ?
            the -35 in the 1% of the area or -41 that it actually is in 99% of the area ?
            just askin .

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by biglentil View Post
              What Chuck is saying is don't trust your own eyes and experiences. Instead "Trust the $cience" cult. "You must eat zee bugz paste!"
              Says the guy who can look at the round moon and sun and photos of earth from the space station as it orbits the earth and says the earth is flat!

              Comment


                #37
                Sure.

                Heat pumps work sort of in Florida, Dont work in Canada. Very expensive to buy and then maintain and yes they never last longer than the company says.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Ground source heat pumps work very well to heat and cool on the prairies.

                  Air source heat pumps have been improved for much lower temperatures and can provide significant amounts of heating and cooling that can be backed up by your existing source of heating in really cold weather.

                  The best investment is a super insulated energy efficient building that requires so little heat that it doesn't matter as much what heat or cooling source you have because there is a lot less energy use.

                  Net zero housing that is super insulated and energy efficient and generates a lot of its own electricity has been around for awhile with the addition of solar panels on the roof.

                  Edmonton has a lot of net zero homes:

                  Retrofitting Edmonton homes to become net-zero ready

                  ​[url]https://globalnews.ca/news/10175476/retrofitting-edmonton-homes-to-become-net-zero-ready/[/url]

                  [url]https://www.landmarkhomes.ca/edmonton/net-zero[/url]

                  [url]https://effecthomes.ca/building-principles/net-zero-energy-homes/[/url]

                  [url]https://butterwick.ca/[/url]

                  Comment


                    #39
                    "Your family stories and experience from where ever you live, are not relevant or comparable to analyzing global temperatures from thousands of sites over many decades."

                    Neither are your"scientists".

                    All measurements are within the margin of error, too many variables, NOTHING can be proven to tenths of degrees, it's all BELIEVE! Dream on.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                      Ground source heat pumps work very well to heat and cool on the prairies.

                      Air source heat pumps have been improved for much lower temperatures and can provide significant amounts of heating and cooling that can be backed up by your existing source of heating in really cold weather.

                      The best investment is a super insulated energy efficient building that requires so little heat that it doesn't matter as much what heat or cooling source you have because there is a lot less energy use.

                      Net zero housing that is super insulated and energy efficient and generates a lot of its own electricity has been around for awhile with the addition of solar panels on the roof.

                      Edmonton has a lot of net zero homes:

                      Retrofitting Edmonton homes to become net-zero ready

                      ​[url]https://globalnews.ca/news/10175476/retrofitting-edmonton-homes-to-become-net-zero-ready/[/url]

                      [url]https://www.landmarkhomes.ca/edmonton/net-zero[/url]

                      [url]https://effecthomes.ca/building-principles/net-zero-energy-homes/[/url]

                      [url]https://butterwick.ca/[/url]
                      "Investment"

                      Only a die hard socialist such as Chuck would call this an "investment":

                      The building, a partially heated storage and vehicle garage is the National Capital Commission's first certified "zero-carbon building."


                      What will be the ROI on this $8,000,000 net zero storage shed our tax payers paid for at Rideau hall.

                      A better question, is how high does this indicate that CO2 taxes will be going forward to make this a positive "investment"? How many tens of thousands per tonne will the CO2 tax be to force us all to spend $8 million on a garden shed because it is cheaper than the alternative?

                      You are constantly advocating for governments to solve all problems. And that governments can do things more efficiently. So if it costs this much when the government does it, how much will it cost for the rest of us?
                      Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Jan 13, 2024, 15:36.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Saskatchewan has been building more energy efficient schools under the Leeds program certification. Leeds - Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.

                        These buildings are healthier with better ventilation systems and have a much lower cost of operation because they use less electricity and energy for heating over their life time.

                        A5 it sounds like you are opposed to more insulation and energy efficient equipment and design?

                        When you build your next house are you going to use 2 by 4 walls and single pane windows too?

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                          Saskatchewan has been building more energy efficient schools under the Leeds program certification. Leeds - Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.

                          These buildings are healthier with better ventilation systems and have a much lower cost of operation because they use less electricity and energy for heating over their life time.

                          A5 it sounds like you are opposed to more insulation and energy efficient equipment and design?

                          When you build your next house are you going to use 2 by 4 walls and single pane windows too?
                          Actually, we used ICF top to bottom, triple pane windows, high efficiency boiler for heat, heat recovery ventilation system, box shape to minimize surface area and roof area.
                          By my math, without a large CO2 tax increase to make energy artificially more expensive, we will never live long enough for these energy efficiency measures to pay for themselves.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            In chucks Mind Spending $25000 to heat your home with a heat pump that would take 12 years or more to pay plus if its like mine in USA when i turn on the heat side my power bill doubles. Math is tough for Liberals just ask Justin! Offering subsidies to get people to switch to something that doesn't work isn't a great plan. Its a Disaster.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by SASKFARMER View Post
                              In chucks Mind Spending $25000 to heat your home with a heat pump that would take 12 years or more to pay plus if its like mine in USA when i turn on the heat side my power bill doubles. Math is tough for Liberals just ask Justin! Offering subsidies to get people to switch to something that doesn't work isn't a great plan. Its a Disaster.
                              Remember almost 20 years ago when natural gas prices were high, and ground source heat pumps were marketed as the solution. They may have had an economic case at that time when electricity was still cheap. But in the interim, thanks to the private sector creating the shale gas boom resulting in cheap gas, and the governments destroying the affordability of electricity, the ground source heat pumps have all been abandoned since they electrical bill was far far higher than heating with gas.
                              Now we are supposed to believe that a heat pump using expensive rationed renewable electricity to transfer heat from -47C ambient air is going to be cost effective when ground source wasn't?

                              Comment


                                #45
                                It's not going to work at those temps

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...