Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Monette Farms like Bernie Madoff?
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
I don't think anyone doubts a farm with an existing, potentially paid for land base can purchase more with profits from the entire farm. The argument is that the new land likely wouldn't cash flow itself until its paid for in 20 plus years and that is pretty specific to farming. No other industry operates that way. The other part of that equation is likely quite a hit to the personal lifestyle (take home income) of the expanding farmer to make it happen, while non farming peers spend disposable income on other things in life, not land payments.
- Likes 2
-
Originally posted by BighatPete View Post
Are there enough Hutterite colonies to prop up the market. Maybe they can do 5/10% of the big properties, but only a small portion
Based on our own finances, I assume there are many successful farmers doing the exact same thing.
In other words, maybe these prices are sustainable.
Maybe there's no need to invoke any Grand conspiracy theories about where the money is coming from and who and why.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostHutterites just bought a quarter for $8,700 per arable acre. On paper it looks like I nearly perfect quarter. Reality is much different.
I'm almost certain they aren't speculating in the land market.
I highly doubt they have outside investors.
They won't be developing or subdividing it. Quite the opposite anything with a house or buildings on it, they tear them down.
By all indications, they continue to be buying land with the profits they made from farming the land that they buy.
If it works for them, I don't see why we should believe it's not working for any other farmer who buys land.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by makar View Post
[url]https://www.producer.com/news/yes-hutterites-do-pay-taxes/[/url]
So the misconception that they are taxed as a church is incorrect.
I assume principal payments on land still have to come out of after tax dollars?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by makar View Post
My afsc loans manager showed me land sales results in my area off fcc website 15 years ago. It was sold to A who was financing B who is a hutt company. Even said so in brackets. Friend of mine sold his farm to a local big business who were just fronting the money for the hutts. Tax benefits i believe are a thing of the past, hutt land around me are numbered companies. Was told hutts cant or wont finance through normal channels.
In the late '80s CIBC foreclosed on land owned by Lajord, Star City and Estuary colonies. Eventually colonies came together and pooled money so that they could help situations before they went that far. Now I think they lend alot amongst themselves.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by makar View Post
My afsc loans manager showed me land sales results in my area off fcc website 15 years ago. It was sold to A who was financing B who is a hutt company. Friend of mine sold his farm to a local big business who were just fronting the money for the hutts. Tax benefits i believe are a thing of the past, hutt land around me are numbered companies. Was told hutts cant or wont finance through normal channels.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
I have been wrong before.
Is that coffee shop speculation or confirmed?
Wouldn't outside investors negate the tax benefits of the church?Last edited by makar; Oct 28, 2024, 19:24.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by makar View PostHutts here all outside investors for years.
Is that coffee shop speculation or confirmed?
Wouldn't outside investors negate the tax benefits of the church?
Leave a comment:
-
Hutterites just bought a quarter for $8,700 per arable acre. On paper it looks like I nearly perfect quarter. Reality is much different.
I'm almost certain they aren't speculating in the land market.
I highly doubt they have outside investors.
They won't be developing or subdividing it. Quite the opposite anything with a house or buildings on it, they tear them down.
By all indications, they continue to be buying land with the profits they made from farming the land that they buy.
If it works for them, I don't see why we should believe it's not working for any other farmer who buys land.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Leave a comment: