• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sask Irrigation project

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by fjlip View Post
    Spuds were tried, "Spudco", we are TOO short a growing season. Cost Sk taxpayers millions!
    And those potato barns were sold for 10 cents on the dollar.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by newguy View Post
      If the government wanted to help all farmers equally and increase production .they could invest in all farmers having access to cheaper fertilizer .Even in the bad years sask is diverse enough it is unusual for the whole province to have a crop failure.
      Saskatchewan has a fertilizer plant but they sold it off and allowed Yara to price off NOLA.

      While most of the fertilizer never makes it more than 350 miles from Belle Plaine.

      Comment


        #23
        Another thing most of the cheerleaders don't notice is these communities have shrunk since the project came along. Riverhurst used to have 3 elevators , a rail line , school, restaurant year round. All gone, wouldn't call that an economic driver when production increased by not only water but different farming practices on dryland and yet the closest elevator still closed.

        No primary highway was built to account for higher production and lack of rail line.

        The phrases used to justify this project just don't hold water.



        Comment


          #24
          Can't forget the Clean Technology Program aka "new dryer program" when discussing the use of government funds to benefit only a few farms. Only 48 projects in Saskatchewan are approved, but it sure seems like several shot for the moon since the government is paying 40%.

          The approved projects are here:
          [url]https://www.canada.ca/en/agriculture-agri-food/news/2022/02/the-government-of-canada-invests-in-clean-technology-to-support-sustainable-farming-practices.html#dataset-filter[/url]

          Comment


            #25
            Not sure why he is saying he isn't waiting for the Feds? Seems they invested in 2020. [url]https://www.producer.com/news/prairies-to-be-biggest-winners-of-federal-infrastructure-money/[/url] Or is that $ gone already?

            Comment


              #26
              It’s too bad the whole irrigation area around Definbaker never did established 40 years ago .
              When one sees the amount of wealth generated in the Medicine Hat to Lethbridge irrigation corridor , it’s been a huge lost opportunity even if a bit farther north , that area still has enough heat units and frost free days it could have been worthwhile probably .

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by newguy View Post
                If the government wanted to help all farmers equally and increase production .they could invest in all farmers having access to cheaper fertilizer .Even in the bad years sask is diverse enough it is unusual for the whole province to have a crop failure.
                How far do you want to take this idea? Since Sask also exports grain and livestock, should government ensure that consumers have access to cheap food? Would you accomplish this by having government own the production? By price controls? By subsidizing the consumers?

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by newguy View Post
                  If the government wanted to help all farmers equally and increase production .they could invest in all farmers having access to cheaper fertilizer .Even in the bad years sask is diverse enough it is unusual for the whole province to have a crop failure.
                  Wasn't there farmers that wanted to invest in Fertilizer production at one time? Even wanted to take over after the CWB was gone. Farmers could have been controlling inputs and sales at same time why didn't that happen?

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post

                    How far do you want to take this idea? Since Sask also exports grain and livestock, should government ensure that consumers have access to cheap food? Would you accomplish this by having government own the production? By price controls? By subsidizing the consumers?
                    Personally governments should stay out of consumer subsidies.Farmers buy and sell on supply and demand and subsides just puts an artificial price on things.What they propose is just flat out unfair to the majority of Sask farmers. Moe math at its best.4 billion spent and thousands of new jobs they say.But where will all these people get health care and education I say.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      I'd be curious as to which farmers are benefitting from the expansion, and even which politicians. A large irrigation expansion has been proposed on Duncairn Dam (SW of Swift Current), with Monette's behind it. The whole thing smells a little off as there hasn't been any new irrigation since the early 80's and now all of a sudden there's capacity for 60+ pivots??

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...