Parsley,
I went to District 1 at Ft. Saskatechewan, AB. and Art Macklin's meeting went much the same way.
On elevator closures, CWB by pushing the car allocation issue, is causing many older elevators to close as the grain co's are not willing to have the CWB dictate where cars are going, so they close all the elevators they cannot afford to operate efficiently.
Art did not agree of course.
Organic was a topic, and Art didn't understand it well.
Trade costs for the US challenge were singled out as the federal government's cost and not the CWB's.
The media indicating that CWB interm and final payments were gov. payments was brought up, and I indicated that with the NAFTA rulings that the initial payment was the CWB's actual purchase cost and that anything above this being paid to us as a profit of the federal gov. and CWB, it is little wonder US growers and the Media say it like they do.
Buy-backs came up of course, and the US saying the CWB is undercutting, was an issue.
I indicated that buy-backs that pay producers to ship to the US were causing undercutting.
Art said this was wrong.
The CWB Rep from Lethbridge went and got some buy-back figures and indicated that I was right, the PRO was $11/t above the buy-back yesterday which proved my point.
Feed Barley Pricing and Pooling was a big issue, and Art went on a long diatribe why the CWB could not shorten pooling periods that made no sense.
Lots of unrest underneath, but few were willing to say much, they left it to us vocal guys!
Hope Art realizes that the CWB is at a crossroads, shape up, or be shipped out.
I went to District 1 at Ft. Saskatechewan, AB. and Art Macklin's meeting went much the same way.
On elevator closures, CWB by pushing the car allocation issue, is causing many older elevators to close as the grain co's are not willing to have the CWB dictate where cars are going, so they close all the elevators they cannot afford to operate efficiently.
Art did not agree of course.
Organic was a topic, and Art didn't understand it well.
Trade costs for the US challenge were singled out as the federal government's cost and not the CWB's.
The media indicating that CWB interm and final payments were gov. payments was brought up, and I indicated that with the NAFTA rulings that the initial payment was the CWB's actual purchase cost and that anything above this being paid to us as a profit of the federal gov. and CWB, it is little wonder US growers and the Media say it like they do.
Buy-backs came up of course, and the US saying the CWB is undercutting, was an issue.
I indicated that buy-backs that pay producers to ship to the US were causing undercutting.
Art said this was wrong.
The CWB Rep from Lethbridge went and got some buy-back figures and indicated that I was right, the PRO was $11/t above the buy-back yesterday which proved my point.
Feed Barley Pricing and Pooling was a big issue, and Art went on a long diatribe why the CWB could not shorten pooling periods that made no sense.
Lots of unrest underneath, but few were willing to say much, they left it to us vocal guys!
Hope Art realizes that the CWB is at a crossroads, shape up, or be shipped out.
Comment