agstar77,
francisco has both argued and defended his position with logic and reasoning.
You have not.
Not defending what you stand for not only serves to clearly reveal your weakness of argument, but exposes the flaw in the basic philosophy behind the argument, which hence mocks the very essence of the central planner.
You have been reduced to "The single desk is what we need because it is what I want".
That is your legacy.
Parsley
francisco has both argued and defended his position with logic and reasoning.
You have not.
Not defending what you stand for not only serves to clearly reveal your weakness of argument, but exposes the flaw in the basic philosophy behind the argument, which hence mocks the very essence of the central planner.
You have been reduced to "The single desk is what we need because it is what I want".
That is your legacy.
Parsley
Comment