• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

293

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #13
    Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post


    Erskine-Smith s'plainin that any opposition to his bill is just conspiracy theory.

    Sent to the senate.

    He says nothing scary about it.

    Basically saying "Don't worry because that's not what I meant"?
    But most current forms of animal agriculture are not acceptable to him.

    Very, very scary.
    Is anyone else sick and tired of this whole liberal ideology that if they get called out in any form or fashion it’s a conspiracy theory?

    next thing will be that it is the Russians behind disinformation on bill 293

    Comment


      #14
      Trust me!

      That was pre Covid language.

      Comment


        #15
        Bill C-293


        Bill C-293, An Act respecting pandemic prevention and preparedness ([url]https://abpdaily.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c1f6a7e3d460ed7f2ff6e92fc&id=0d696553a0&e=[/url] 37cb5a9cca) is in its second reading in Senate. While Alberta Beef Producers supports the overall objective of pandemic preparedness, we are disappointed in the current wording.

        On Oct 24, ABP Vice Chair Doug Roxburgh joined Minister of Agriculture and Irrigation RJ Sigurdson, Minister of Health Adriana LaGrange, Alberta Chicken Producers, and Alberta Pork to speak in response to the bill. ([url]https://abpdaily.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c1f6a7e3d460ed7f2ff6e92fc&id=b4d85b104a&e=[/url] 37cb5a9cca)
        We are urging the Senate of Canada to amend the bill to reflect a balanced and fair approach that doesn't unfairly target animal agriculture.
        [URL=https://abpdaily.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c1f6a7e3d460ed7f2ff6e92fc&id=a9ff2600e2&e= 37cb5a9cca][/URL]
        Bill C-282



        Bill C-282, An Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act (supply management) ([url]https://abpdaily.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c1f6a7e3d460ed7f2ff6e92fc&id=ec795057c8&e=[/url] 37cb5a9cca), is currently at consideration in committee in the Senate.

        On Oct 8, ABP, Alberta Pork, Alberta Cattle Feeders' Association, and Team Alberta Crops sent a letter ([url]https://abpdaily.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c1f6a7e3d460ed7f2ff6e92fc&id=21ff924a92&e=[/url] 37cb5a9cca) to Matt Jones, Minister of Alberta Jobs, Economy, and Trade.

        Following a rally in support of the bill on Oct 10, British Columbia Cattlemen’s Association, Alberta Beef Producers, Saskatchewan Cattlemen’s Association, Manitoba Beef Producers, Beef Farmers of Ontario, New Brunswick Cattle Producers, Nova Scotia Cattle Producers, and Prince Edward Island Cattle Producers, released a joint statement ([url]https://abpdaily.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c1f6a7e3d460ed7f2ff6e92fc&id=a0a0f9f946&e=[/url] 37cb5a9cca) expressing our disappointment.
        On Oct 23, Canadian Cattle Association President Nathan Phinney joined the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade to witness Bill C-282. You can watch this session online ([url]https://abpdaily.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c1f6a7e3d460ed7f2ff6e92fc&id=4c4276493a&e=[/url] 37cb5a9cca).
        [URL=https://abpdaily.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c1f6a7e3d460ed7f2ff6e92fc&id=b68aa76678&e= 37cb5a9cca][/URL]
        ​

        Comment


          #16
          It’s the absolute intention behind the wording , and all farmers know it and 98% are against it .
          it’s the 2% that support it that had the helping hand in writing it that’s the problem

          Comment


            #17
            There have been a lot of selfies posted on social media of farm groups meeting with politicians . Maybe less photo ops and more in depth talking would avoid this nonsense.

            Conservatives in both houses could have slowed this bill . It is obvious that farm groups were asleep on this one. And individual farmers can't be tasked with making noise .

            What exactly are our check off funds used for , and what are executive directors and policy people paid for??

            Comment


              #18
              Dude, there are no policy people, that's what I'm trying to say.
              Your checkoff dollars go to agronomy research.

              Comment


                #19
                Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
                Dude, there are no policy people, that's what I'm trying to say.
                Your checkoff dollars go to agronomy research.
                Because the only thing holding back our industry is just one more study on canola population density.

                Comment


                  #20
                  Yup, ever higher national yield targets. Showing competitor nations how seems important as well.
                  Ottawa? That's like the weather.
                  Something to blame when hand sitting doesn't turn out the way we would like.
                  Markets? Hell, my Cargill rep looks after every thing for me!

                  Comment


                    #21
                    Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
                    Yup, ever higher national yield targets. Showing competitor nations how seems important as well.
                    Ottawa? That's like the weather.
                    Something to blame when hand sitting doesn't turn out the way we would like.
                    And when the 5 year plan implemented by bureaucrats isn't fulfilled by the peasants, who gets accused of sabotage and sent to the gulag?

                    It is easy to see how such top down plans/budgets could end so disasterously.

                    Comment


                      #22
                      The industry fixation with C 282 is misplaced. Bill C 293 is far more detrimental than
                      C 282, and has been all but ignored by agricultural associations, and Premiers except Alberta.

                      The cost of supply management is a consumer cost, & related to demand for the product.

                      The impact of C 293 as related to the climate, the pandemic and the over riding directive of the ONE HEALTH new food system has a published C40 target to decrease carbon footprints of individuals by decreasing meat consumption to zero.

                      This bill gives them the legislative right to develop and implement the process.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...