Originally posted by TASFarms
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Friday Cocktail and end if week chat.
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Crop insurance is going to hurt farms who have had very poor crops for 3-4 yrs or more. Commodity prices are poor, coverage will be very low end result it will hardly cover costs, if it even does.
If you have say 23 bu durum avg at 80% cov and they price it at $8.50
well you can do the math.
$195 ac doesn’t cover much. Take off $12-15 ac for premium
May as well rent the farm for $125
Canola premiums will be ridiculous for those who have collected over the drought yrs. Some are paying in excess of $30 ac for premium.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BTO780 View PostCrop insurance is going to hurt farms who have had very poor crops for 3-4 yrs or more. Commodity prices are poor, coverage will be very low end result it will hardly cover costs, if it even does.
If you have say 23 bu durum avg at 80% cov and they price it at $8.50
well you can do the math.
$195 ac doesn’t cover much. Take off $12-15 ac for premium
May as well rent the farm for $125
Canola premiums will be ridiculous for those who have collected over the drought yrs. Some are paying in excess of $30 ac for premium.
also there is no way the east side is subsidizing the west . That’s a load of b/s , our crop insurance premiums are huge compared to coverage .
those out east should just enjoy the fact they have been lucky the past 4-5 years .
Comment
-
Yeah province defintely contributes. Its 36% by feds. 24 by province.
other 40 is by producer. 100 % of admin costs are paid by federal.
Its a good program in many cases. Anyone ever had to deal with any other companies?
they are stingggyyy at best.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I would like to see what payment per acre producers would get if half of federal and provincial payments were divided out per ace an paid every year, give producers a base amount and not have producers do things for insurance that agronomically don't make sense. Back stopping land concentration seems counter productive to me. Access to insurance for a fixed number of years to let producers get established and then eliminate or cap coverage would be my suggestion. Government needs to reduce costs at all levels.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SASKFARMER View PostIt is a Chinese owned farm and they ran the farm first cattle
With idea shipping back to china. Then cattle and grain. I don’t think money a problem
Sask auditor says farmland ownership rules have no teeth.
Comment
-
Most likely the chinese have status in canada. For example you can get canadian citizenship by investing $800K in *****bec government bonds. Voila: dual citizen and now eligible to own farmland and other real estate in all provinces. Great for laundering money. Yes, canuckistan is that much of a shithole.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
When land was $900 here and $100 in SK, people here bought all they could afford out there the minute non resident restrictions were lifted.
Respectfully, I've often wondered what SK would look like if it hadn't been in a huge multi-faceted bubble for so long?
I've seen some changes in 45 years and I compare to similar regions both here and across the line.
Here, our Lost Generation stayed in the province. And I'm not aware of any direct Chinese involvement in ag land. (Or Monette's) Oil plays another story.Last edited by blackpowder; Dec 4, 2024, 18:13.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment