• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Great Global Warming Swindle

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    No.It s because you're strident,vehement,vexatious ,dogmatic and shrill.All excellent qualities in an evangelical.

    Comment


      #32
      CP,

      I am a conservative... which means at heart I believe we should conserve our resourses, be efficient, not waste, be creative to attain these goals, and respect each other.

      When applied in a peaceful, caring manner I believe the above atributes will create prosperity, deminish poverty, bridge the gap over fear, and build a trusting society that is more than the parts that make it up individually.

      Now, how do Gore and Suzuki fit into these attributes? Can we trust what they say... do they walk the walk that they talk?

      I will take Tim Ball as a man to have as the role model for my son any day ... over Gore or Suzuki!

      Balance and common sense are interesting attributes! Both are required in large measure to be a sucessful farmer... especially over a life time!

      My hope for you is that you can learn the balance, the respect to allow others to learn by doing...
      Often a gentle nudge goes much further to helping guide a brother or sister... that a sharp hard shove.

      Comment


        #33
        Win-maybe its that i disagree with this herd on most things.

        Tom if want your kid to idolize Tim ball over susuki go ahead its your choice, i'll let my kid make up his own mind.

        In any event i think this arguement will be settled in a few years.

        Tom what about your conservative leader going down the green path?

        Comment


          #34
          Harper will do anything for VOTES. He would even turn green for VOTES. As he pops-up across this country from day to day with his promises of billions of dollars for this or that, he is listening to his advisors telling him as to what group would be the best to receive duh money. VOTES follow the money, at least in theory.

          Also Harper wants to get the jump on the Liberals by stealing their thunder...hence the green approach.

          Comment


            #35
            Too bad it seems to be working for him - hey socialists? When the media turns on the liberals you know it is bad.

            It sure will suck for you when they get a majority and can start to turn this country into something to be proud of again.

            Comment


              #36
              Yeah, Cotton your kids got a great role model. What are you going to say when one day he comes back at you and says "Dad if you're so smart how come you can't even spell 'I' correctly?)

              <blockquote>Win-maybe its that i (it's I) disagree with this herd on most things.

              Tom if want your kid to idolize Tim ball over susuki(Suzuki)go ahead its your choice, i'll(I'll) let my kid make up his own mind.

              In any event i (I) think this arguement(argument) will be settled in a few years.

              Tom what about your conservative leader going down the green path?</blockquote>

              Comment


                #37
                Cotton is a great role model if he let's his kids choose.

                Parsley

                Comment


                  #38
                  Good point.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    CP,

                    What is so environmentally irresponsible about this?

                    "While individual scientists, engineers and economists have spoken out about the serious flaws in the Kyoto Protocol and other carbon dioxide emission (CO2) control schemes, much more is needed. In particular, a high profile, independent and professional non-profit entity is urgently required that can effectively counter the government relations and communications of today's powerful and well-funded environmental lobby. This is the purpose of the NRSP. Taking advantage of our substantive understanding of the issue, NRSP is well positioned to effectively mobilize Canadians to force government to deal with climate change in a more realistic fashion than through the control of CO2 and other ‘greenhouse gases’.

                    Goals for 2006/07:

                    NRSP’s first campaign is focused on dispelling the notion that Canada needs CO2 reduction plans. CO2 is very unlikely to be a substantial driver of climate change and is not a pollutant. Global climate change is primarily a natural phenomenon and so governments should focus on solving environmental problems over which we have influence (air, land and water pollution being obvious examples). NRSP will articulate a vision that also promotes assisting our most vulnerable citizens adapt to climate change while encouraging continued research in this exceptionally complex field.
                    Become recognized by media, government, industry and ordinary Canadians as the most reputable voice for the promotion of science-based climate change policy.
                    Identify and track the positions of MPs and MLAs across the country in order to identify, and assist, politicians willing to support developing climate and pollution policy based on the most up-to-date science, engineering and economics.
                    Have a measurable impact on the public's understanding of climate change, with a target of significantly lessening support for implementation of CO2 controls.
                    Strategy:

                    Create a much stronger and more public debate concerning climate and pollution policy by:

                    distinguishing legitimate concerns about climate change and pollution from unsupportable claims that humans are a significant contributor to climate change
                    showing how, in many cases, the promotion of severe greenhouse gas restrictions is not beneficial to Canadians or the environment and merely reflect predetermined agendas and strong vested interests
                    Tactics:
                    Direct media input (OpEds, letters, media appearances) from non-governmental, non-industry climate scientists and NRSP executives
                    Establishment of an experts speaker's bureau for public appearances, media interviews and government testimony
                    Convening well-publicized news conferences with experts in the field
                    Coordinating unbiased public opinion polling on the issue
                    Direct mail campaigns
                    Email and Internet newsletters to NRSP supporters and other concerned Canadians
                    Public education campaigns
                    Consumer advocacy based on the latest developments in science, engineering and economics concerning climate change and pollution."

                    http://www.nrsp.com/strategy.html

                    Why wouldn't it be reasonable to ask anyone in my family to consider these ideas?

                    Hmmmmm... what exactly is being a leader and father all about CP?

                    Now it's wrong to care about how those around us affect the world we live in... especially those I had a part in bringing here and am responsible to guide?

                    Swindles are a dime a dozen... I think I owe it to my family to tell them about one when I see it!

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...