• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Unfair interference" CWB in Ontario promoting the status quo

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    "Unfair interference" CWB in Ontario promoting the status quo

    Although he claims not to be on CWB time, Kyle Korneychuck and former President and CEO Measner are making the rounds in Ontario farm country, telling them that the loss of the CWB will mean the loss of supply management soon!!
    Prehaps Mr. Korneychuck along with Mr. Toews need to be sent to Siberia!
    Erik

    The Post (Hanover, ON)
    News, Friday, April 6, 2007, p. A5
    Unfair interference
    Canadian Wheat Board is everyone's concern
    Jon Radojkovic

    Elmwood - There is unfair federal government interference in the Canadian Wheat Board, according to former president and CEO Adrian Measner, and even local farmers in Grey and Bruce should be wary of their own programs.

    "I came away with more fear but luckily it ended on a positive note," said Simon DeBoer, president of the local Christian Farmers of Ontario.

    Measner came to an Elmwood public meeting to hear him, along with board member of the CWB, Karl Korneychuck, to tell local farmers of the CWB's fight over its existence with the ruling federal Conservative Party.

    All the events leading up to the federal government's initiatives to disband the western farmers' control over the CWB and open it up to market forces began once the Harper government was elected last year, according to Measner.

    "They had an agenda before they were elected," he said. Prime Minister Steven Harper had been a strong critic of the CWB as a member of the National Citizen's Coalition, as well as the parliamentary assistant to agriculture David Anderson.

    "If you think it's only a western Canadian problem then you're wrong," announced Korneychuck, who was invited as guest and not as a board member of the CWB. There is a government gag order about any of the 15 CWB board members speaking out in favour of single desk issues.

    "If the transnationals win in western Canada and the CWB is broken then supply management is next," concluded Korneychuck.

    The Harper government would like to open up the CWB's farmer controlled single desk pooling of wheat and barley to market forces. What Measner and Korneychuck are saying is that that would lead to farmers having only minimum choices.

    "If you think an individual farmer can get a better price selling wheat to one of four corporations with over $60 billion worth of business every year, who own 73 per cent of global grain trade, then you're fooling yourself," Measner said.

    DeBoer likened this to the demise of the Ontario Pork Producers Marketing Board. What used to be a farmer controlled and operated pooled pork marketing board has fallen away now to open market forces.

    "Some guys thought they could get a better price individually," DeBoer says. The Tara area farmer, who used to be part of the OPPM, says large corporations, such as Maple Leaf and McCain now control the market. "We're certainly not better off now," he added.

    Measner pointed out that the two organizations out west, which Harper and Minster of Agriculture Chuck Strahl often name as supporting open market options, are nothing but a sham. The Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association and Western Barley Growers Association, have about 400 and 100 members respectively. The farmer controlled Canadian Wheat Board has over 70,000 members.

    "Yet, the feds always point to these two groups as the voice of the farmers out here. This is not so," says Measner.

    Some have compared Ontario's wheat marketing board, which sells as a pool, and the choice of also selling on the open market, as similar to what might happen out west.

    "You can't compare our situation here with the one out west," said Bev Hill, who owns a small elevator and grows wheat and who's father, Gordon, was one of the founders of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture.

    He pointed out that first the amount of wheat grown in Ontario is "insignificant," compared to western amounts. Secondly, the proximity to big markets for Ontario growers makes a huge difference in distribution costs and marketing options.

    "We are a three hour truck ride for most of the domestic and export markets here," said Hill. Western growers ship hundreds of miles by rail car mostly, because trucking is too costly, to either the ports of Vancouver or Thunder Bay. There are no big American City buyers in the midwest like Chicago near Ontario or Toronto or routes out of Canada like the St. Lawrence River.

    "I would like to see this government operate on the principles of democracy and open and free society," Grant Robertson said, who is a national director on the National Farmers Union.

    Measner explained how Strahl had tried to orchestrate the demise of the CWB. Beginning with a closed-door meeting last summer when only open market supporters were invited, such as the WCWPA and WBPA. Out of that meeting a task force was formed to talk about an open market system only, which the CWB declined to join. When Measner refused to take down from the CWB web site, an article supporting the CWB single desk selling, he was fired in December. Then the five appointed CWB board members were replaced with pro open market supporters. Even with allegations of vote rigging by the Conservative government, in a recent CWB election, eight of the 10 board positions were elected to keep the CWB as it was, giving them a majority on the 15 board panel.

    "I ran in a strong Conservative Party riding and won," said Korneychuck. "The vote was a strong message that farmers realize what's going on," he added.

    At the end of the meeting in Elmwood last week, audience members, made up of farmers and farm leaders, came away on a positive note. After a unanimous vote all three local farm organizations - the CFFO NFUO and OFA - agreed to support the CWB in its fight to survive.

    "We as farmers need to stand together," said Robert Emerson, Bruce County OFA president.

    #2
    Yet a positive article from High River, sorry all for the long articles but worth the read!!!
    Erik

    Change brewing for barley farmers
    62% want overhaul to wheat board

    BY Lucy Rowed
    Tuesday April 03, 2007

    As Leroy Newman positions an auger into the open hatch of his grain bin, the weight of the decades-old Canadian grain marketing policy falls squarely on his shoulders. Newman, who farms with his father, Richard, and brother, Ross, knows he will never recover the true value of the malt barley he is selling today.
    “Right now I’m selling all my malt barley for feed,” said Newman, whose family grows 1,000 acres of barley.
    For Newman, a fourth generation farmer who spends 30-60 minutes per day following the markets, it is an unacceptable consequence of the Canadian Wheat Board barley monopoly that malt barley sells for less than feed barley.
    However, that may change.
    Federal Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl announced plans to remove barley from the exclusive domain of the board by Aug. 1.
    The debate has fermented in the grain bins of Western Canadian farmers for generations. Few issues are as volatile.
    On the surface the issue is about marketing choice and income. At its heart, it becomes a philosophical debate, a juxtaposition of ideologies for which there is no reckoning of sides.
    Understanding the depth of emotion in this debate must begin at the turn of the century when many farmers faced not only economic hardship but food shortages during The Depression. A strong wheat pool ethic developed to give farmers clout in the distribution and marketing of their grain.
    The Wheat Board had a short run in 1919 but was not officially created until 1935. After the stock market crash when low wheat prices bankrupted the wheat pools, the federal government stepped in. What began as a temporary measure turned into the Wheat Board Act in 1935. At that time, participation was voluntary. The mandatory aspect was instituted to ensure a good supply of grain during the Second World War when soaring U.S. prices threatened to siphon away Canadian wheat. After the war, the mandatory requirement remained in effect because Canada signed a five-year contract to supply wheat to Britain to help with its post-war recovery. Barley was added to the wheat board’s domain in 1949. Feed barley was later removed.
    Over the years, with the arrival of the Internet and better access to information, farmers have grown in marketing skill and support for the wheat board has declined.
    But it is still mandatory for western Canadian farmers to sell their malt, export and human food barley through the wheat board. Feed barley can be sold directly to feedlots.
    Because the wheat board averages its price over the year and because it sold large volumes of malt barley at a low price earlier in the year, Newman feels he will earn more by selling his barley to the feedlots.
    Stahl’s decision to remove barley from the total control of the wheat board, follows the results of a March 13 non-binding, barley plebiscite where 62 per cent of voters expressed a preference for marketing choice.
    Newman is surprised at the number of farmers who prefer the no-choice option. The results show 38 per cent of the 29,000 total voters and 21 per cent of Alberta voters were in favour of the status quo.
    “I’m surprised it’s that high,” Newman said. He believes the results would have been different with a weighted vote as 1,700 farmers produce 80 per cent of the barley.
    Survey results vary across the prairies. Albertans are 78 per cent in favour of choice, while Manitobans are split on the issue with 50.6 per cent eager to retain the CWB as the single-desk authority.




    In the past few years, Alberta has produced close to 50 per cent of the barley, while Manitoba contributed under nine per cent, Newman said.
    Macleod MP Ted Menzies said the Conservative government’s plan to restore the free barley market has been a long time coming.
    “Personally, I think it is long overdue that
    farmers in Western Canada can have the choice to market their barley to whomever they choose,” he said.
    Menzies, who farmed in the Claresholm area for 30 years, said when he hauled barley to the Canada Malting Company in Calgary the wheat board charged him the same rate as if the barley was shipped to Vancouver.
    Those who favour the wheat board argue that averaging the shipping costs among all producers levels the playing field.
    Newman disagrees.
    “Should I subsidize them because they live thousands of miles from a port? They don’t subsidize me because our fixed costs are higher because of living closer to higher density areas. Nobody helps us out with that.”
    And he doesn’t have much sympathy for farmers who don’t have the time or interest to follow the markets.
    “Should I subsidize them because they’re not market savvy? It’s the reality of business.”
    Those in favour of a wheat board monopoly worry farmers will be the big losers by undercutting each other to make a sale.
    Free market proponents argue the CWB has operational issues which hurt farmers.
    “I think the wheat board had its place but there is no accountability,” Newman said.
    “There has never been a public examination of the wheat board books,” said Barry Cooper, a University of Calgary political science professor who has argued publicly against the board.
    “They have no one looking over their shoulder,” he said.
    George Groeneveld, Highwood MLA and Alberta Agriculture Minister, said the vote does not eliminate the role of the board. The newly-minted minister has softened his stand on the issue, recognizing that northern Alberta farmers see more advantages in the wheat board than those in the south, who benefit from closer markets.
    “The wheat board has a lot of expertise,” as well as offshore marketing contacts, Groeneveld said.
    “The wheat board can play a great role in marketing. So it really upsets me that they say they can’t, and that they are going to pack up their toys.”
    Groeneveld is refering to public statements by the wheat board that it cannot market barley effectively in an open market. The board has also suggested it will challenge the federal government’s plans to remove barley’s single-desk status.
    Menzies does not see the wheat board derailing the government’s plans.
    “I’m very confident. It’s not a big process to change. The Minister has said he wants this in place for the beginning of the crop year and that’s Aug 1.”
    Menzies believes skeptics will be pleasantly surprised by the results.
    “Farmers that are concerned won’t see the sky fall on Aug. 2. They may see more profits and realize that this can work.”
    As for the wheat board, Menzies said, “They’ll be dragged into the free market kicking and screaming.”
    Those in the brewing and malt industry believe a free market is a step in the right direction.
    “It’s very positive for the people that use barley,” said Ed McNally of Big Rock Brewery in Calgary.
    Though some in his industry have faced malt shortages over the years, it never affected Big Rock, he said.
    “We’ve never felt the shortage.”
    Once barley is cut from the wheat board roster, Strahl has suggested he may go after wheat. But it wouldn’t be without a vote and not until after Aug. 1.

    Comment


      #3
      Wow, talk about desperate. These guys are grasping at every straw.

      I guess nobody told them that they had a VOLUNTARY wheat board in Ontario that farmers voted for just like in the west.

      No wonder they can't come up with a business plan all these guys do is travel around ranting and raving about conservatives.

      Newsflash Kyle, you lost. Give it up already and get back to work.

      Comment


        #4
        The power struggle continues. Threating lawsuits, speaking tours, intimidation, and now slanted phone surveys (received one yesterday).Don't you guys know when to quit? 62% of the voting farmers gave you a clear message. What transpires in your heads to think that 8 board of directors can control the majority of the farmers? YOU LOST-life will still go on.

        Comment


          #5
          ... and more producer returns fly out the window for their speaking tours.

          Criminal.

          Comment


            #6
            Hey, at least the Hanover Post got one thing right -- they gve Korneychuk the first name of "Karl". A most fitting nametag.

            Comment


              #7
              I guess I would be interested in who picked up the tab for the former CO and CWB director. If it is the CWB then I would like the explanation of how this in fact adds to the returns on my wheat and barley sales.

              Comment


                #8
                The CWB has no place rallying in eastern Canada. This is a western Canadian issue and needs to be battled out in western Canada and should not get tied into eastern supply management. The NDP have lost my vote for a long time to come.

                Comment


                  #9
                  What's wrong guys? Haven't you noticed Chuck Strahl crossing the country at taxpayers expense spouting his version all the while making sure the CWB is gagged. Chuck S. sets a good example.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Obviously you are not a farmer chuck.

                    If you were, you would understand that every dollar that is wasted by the board won't show up in our wheat cheques.

                    I guess any price is fine in the fight for socialism. (or the battle against those mean bullies who are trying to impose freedom on your neighbors)

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Good point chuck but farmers freedom to market is a federal issue. We need the federal support. The final decision should be based on what western farmers want. To connect wheat board to supply management next is just wrong. Hold another plebisite today and in the future and I think the CWB will have even less votes. The CWB should give us farmers a lot more credit.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Chuck Chuck
                        Give me an example of where the CWB has been gagged.There is a limit to how much propaganda the board can but out each day and I would suggest at present they are pretty well maxed.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Haven`t heard any more about the CWB`s gag order lawsuit.....has that been dropped?? Hopefully they can demonstrate their superior intelligence with that mega-case!

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...