• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Maltsters concerned -government has fully grasped the

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Maltsters concerned -government has fully grasped the

    By Roberta Rampton
    WINNIPEG, Manitoba, April 23 (Reuters) - Ottawa should wait


    until Aug. 1, 2008, to put its new barley marketing regulations into
    effect to give maltsters time to fill or unwind existing contracts,
    Canada's two largest malting companies said on Monday.


    Maltsters have made significant sales based on contracts for barley
    supplies with the Canadian Wheat Board beyond Aug. 1, 2007 -- the date
    Canada's agriculture minister has set for the agency to lose its sales
    monopoly, said Robert Meijer, spokesman for Prairie Malt Ltd., owned
    jointly by Saskatchewan Wheat Pool <SWP.TOand Cargill Ltd.


    "We can push (the date) back, or the wheat board and the government, I
    suspect, will be held fully accountable for the liability this is
    going to create in terms of costs," Meijer said.


    Maltsters have told government officials, including Agriculture
    Minister Chuck Strahl, that the liability would be in the "high tens of millions"
    of
    dollars, Meijer said.


    Farmers' barley deliveries have already slowed because of market
    uncertainty about the Aug. 1 change, and all players in the industry
    stand to be harmed, said Steven Gorst, president of privately held
    Canada Malting Co. Ltd., the country's largest maltster.


    "Currently it does not seem the government has fully grasped the
    problems an abrupt change will generate," Gorst said in an e-mail
    response to questions.


    The government, the CWB and maltsters need to "sit down and work
    through a sensible transition" and postpone the change by a year, Gorst said.


    Officials were not available for comment from Canada's two other
    maltsters, Rahr Malting Canada Ltd. and International Malting Co.
    Canada Ltd.


    Canadian maltsters export more than C$200 million ($179 million) of
    malt per year and buy about half the CWB's malting barley supplies annually.
    Canada is the world's second-largest exporter of malt, which is used
    to make beer.


    The government published its draft regulations on Saturday to end the
    CWB's monopoly on sales of barley from Canada's main Prairie growing
    region to maltsters and export markets, which would give farmers the
    option of selling directly to buyers.


    A government analysis accompanying the regulations acknowledged the
    CWB might not be able to attract enough barley to fill its sales contracts.


    "Some companies ... may have to pay higher prices to obtain barley
    from grain companies or directly from farmers, as barley prices have
    increased recently," the government's regulatory impact analysis statement said.


    There is a 30-day comment period for the regulations, after which time
    the department and cabinet will consider whether changes are required
    before bringing them into effect.


    The CWB has not yet determined whether it will continue to sell barley
    past Aug. 1, and has told farmers it can longer provide an outlook for
    returns for the crop because of the uncertainty.


    The CWB and other groups have also said they may challenge the
    government's plans in court.


    In an interview last week, Strahl insisted he would not delay the Aug. 1
    start date.


    Maltsters knew the government intended to make changes to the CWB's
    monopoly, Meijer said, but did not know how plans would unfold, and had no
    legal alternative but to secure supplies from the CWB.


    Prairie Malt would like to see the regulations specify an Aug. 1, 2008,
    change date to allow time for any court challenges as well as to give
    maltsters enough lead time to adjust contracts and secure future supplies,
    Meijer said.
    "We're talking about a year to get it right," he said.
    ($1=$1.12 Canadian)
    ((Reporting by Roberta Rampton, editing by Rob Wilson; Reuters
    Messaging: roberta.rampton.reuters.com@reuters.net; 204
    947-3548))
    REUTERS

    #2
    Your heading should read:

    "Malsters concerned Government has not fully grasped that Maltsters have made an offer the Government cannot refuse"
    Toney Sopranoto

    Comment


      #3
      Vader:

      "We're talking about a year to get it right," ...

      Count the: seconds, hours, Days, Months... between January 23, 2006... the SECOND the Conservatives were elected; and August 1 2007....

      Vader... the CWB and Prairie Had much more than a year to prepare.

      Substandard marketing and give away pricing should have stopped in 1998 after the Farmer Elected Directors took over.

      Please explain why the CWB Managers have been caught red handed with;

      Bone
      Shattering
      Price Discounts
      Pricing Malt Barley way below feed:

      AGAIN & AGAIN & Again...

      To see it actually on the books for 2008... proof positive of negligence?

      Who have the majority of CWB directors worked for VADER...?

      Rod Flaman, Ken Ritter, Bill & Bill, Allan, Kyle, And the master of you all Mc*****y... you certainly have proved the point perfectly...

      you work far harder for CWB Agents now that push has come to shove.

      Now ... you just take the ..... and run.

      How much will you CWB 7Iron Directors pay yourselves for the trouble to clean us out before jumping ship Vader...

      You guys make the Ausies look like angels!

      Comment


        #4
        Vader:

        "Good governance has realistic, audited programs to combat corruption, and does not send good money after bad. Corruption in officials is a grave breach of trust. It connotes decay, immorality, or impairment of integrity or virtue.... The culprits exploit their office to win advantages to which they are not entitled. They are not up to the tasks of good government, but seek office to milk the system. Given the opportunity and the ease of concealment, the temptation is rife in societies inured to it. Beyond a criminal law which detects it and orders restitution, we need a fearless press, a vigilant democracy and savvy electorate."

        Comment


          #5
          Vader

          Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. I encourage you to look at the following graphs. The graphs demonstrate why farmers are delivering domestic feed market versus CWB. It also demonstrates North America and world malt barley market price signals that western Canadian farmers are not recieving.

          http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agc6756/$FILE/us-canadabarleypricespreads.pdf

          When I talk to the domestic maltsters, the main issue they face is getting farmers to deliver old crop on contracts they have signed. I also note (you may disagree) that any new sales with delivery over the next 6 months will be at prices substantially above the current PRO. As highlighted in the interim PRO, the assumption is that deliveries will slow to the point the CWB may not even be able to cover exising sales.

          Are there creative innovative ideas that would contribute generate the needed market signals to ensure a steady flow of malt barley deliveries over the next 3 months? The commitment on old crop has to get above the current petty bickering and contribute to business solutions to something that will obviously impact the malt barley market long term.

          Comment


            #6
            Add to my list of interesting activities is to review some history around the PRO. You can find on the CWB website (Slide 15 and 16).

            http://www.cwb.ca/public/en/farmers/producer/historical/pdf/2006-07/fpcbpccharts_042307.pdf

            Will note the Standard select 2 row PRO held in the $160 to $170/tonne area during the summer and the $170 to $175/tonne area during the early fall. This is likely the period when most of the malt barley sales were put on the books (no clarity on what percentage). Markets did rally and this was reflected in the October (held in the $195 to $200/tonne range over the winter. I has subsequently been dropped to $192/tonne.

            It is interesting to follow the patterns of PRO announcements relative to the amount of pricing in the pools as well as the cast opportunities during the same period. You can also overlay other issues like director elections, barley plebiscites and follow from them. Hopefully the PRO remains a legitimate forecast.

            Comment


              #7
              Vader

              Where is the $50 million added value to barley pool with the CWB?

              Right now a farmer delivering on CWB select 2 row barley pool is loosing a minimum $.40/ bushel and more likely $.65/bu. If Cargill is telling the truth about the CWB's sweetheart deal to bail them out of their loosing contract with one of the major Canadian brewery's, why should I as a farmer support their incompetence?

              Comment


                #8
                There is plenty of min. price contracts on malt made by the cwb. So these contracts are basically priced and delivery is committed. Maybe there is some fixed price contracts on the books but not likely considering the poor price. I see nothing wrong with cancelling pooled account pricing in which the product has not been secured from farmers. I have a feeling on this one and my feeling is that there is no unsecured grain here, just some more CWB BS.

                Comment


                  #9
                  kamichel

                  An interesting point.

                  If someone is an unsecured creditor in a business failure, you have no rights until the financial obligations are filled to the secured creditors.

                  In the case of CWB contracts, the maltsters have a priced contract with the CWB but it is the maltsters/exporters responsibility to source/do the selections. If the maltster/exporter can't get the delivery commitment from farmers, then the contracts are void - no CWB responsibility (at least from my understanding). The only way for a maltster/exporter to have a secure contract is to have a production contract with a farmer.

                  The whole premise of the current system (sinlgle desk) is western Canadian farmers grow 6 to 8 MMT of malt barley varieties and maltsters/exporters get an opportunity to select the best 2 MMT.

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...