Chat tonight for you guys that have been concerned.....at 8:30 tonight..... to talk a little about what's happening at port. Sounds grim if it's true.
Who knows what's going on?
Parsley
Who knows what's going on?
Parsley
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
CWB and CGC Grain Grading at Port....Gossip?
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Parsley,
Let me get this straight, as we all had such a hard time getting on the chat site, and kept getting cut off, was this about CWRS quality problems?
Was something mentioned about 2CWRS falling numbers being too low?
Was it about our west coast terminals not being able to meet milling quality standards because of sprouted wheat, or wheat dryed too fast, leading to whole boat loads being rejected?
What does this say about KVD dependability, shouldn't we be testing falling #'s at the local elevator like the American system has for ever?
-
It's rumor so far Tom4CWB, but there could be a problem. #2 CWRS is supposedly at port and the buyers have refused because the falling # is bad. Anyone who mills flour knows that you need a proper balance of FN's and protein. One or the other too high or too low and the bread is not ideal.
With the grading system we have, it is rumored that the CGC made the usual eyeballing.....and it probably looked ok....but it wasn't .
Sprouted grain=Disastrous falling#'s
Like we were chatting last night, it's only rumor.....but if it's true, it could be serious.
Parsley
Chatting is pretty neat!
Comment
-
It's rumor so far Tom4CWB, but there could be a problem. #2 CWRS is supposedly at port and the buyers have refused because the falling # is bad. Anyone who mills flour knows that you need a proper balance of FN's and protein. One or the other too high or too low and the bread is not ideal.
With the grading system we have, it is rumored that the CGC made the usual eyeballing.....and it probably looked ok....but it wasn't .
Sprouted grain=Disastrous falling#'s
Like we were chatting last night, it's only rumor.....but if it's true, it could be serious.
Parsley
Chatting is pretty neat!
Comment
-
It's not just rumor guys!
Let me share with you a few exerpts of a copy of a letter that, shall we say arrived across my desk the other day.
It was addressed to Mr. Ed Guest, Executive Director of the WGEA from Ward Weisensel VP Transportation and Country Operations CWB.
The first paragraph reads: Further to our meeting of March 22, 2001, the purpose of this letter is to advise Country Elevator Association (CEA) members of a serious problem that is affecting the quality reputation that Canada has built over the years. In particular, I'm refering to the low and highly variable falling number(FN) levels on shipments of No.2 and 3 Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS).
Weather conditions during harvest of this year's crop resulted in varying levels of kernal sprouting of wheat...
... The net effect of this blending is that the FN levels of No.2/3CWRS unloading at port are not meeting the quality expectations of customers.
...The present segregation program is not meeting all our expectations. As a result, we are in the process of identifying alternatives that need to be employed to ensure that Canadian wheat maintains its quality reputation with export customers. One of these is the potential NIR system... Another would be the implementation of a program that intergrates FN requirements at both the country and terminal level.
So there you have it straight from the CWB themselves. Our system, the CWB/CGC/KVD system has failed us big time.
AdamSmith
Comment
-
Parsley,
My local elevator did confirm that there is a problem, but said this was the first report from a farmer that he had recieved.
Isn't this amazing, farmers are responsible for producing the grain quality, but when a problem occurs, we are the last to know!
What does this say about quality control in Canada?
US elevators have been doing falling #'s for ever, as do all millers.
Isn't it amazing that Canadian Farmers are the last people on the planet to learn that the falling # is the first and most important criteria in Milling wheat, along with bushel weight!
# 3 CWRS with a good falling # is worth much more than # 1 with a bad falling #
This is why when I shipped my 3CWRS to the US it was worth much more than in Canada.
The CWB does not really pay anything for protein in CWRS, and until now because of high thruput elevators, blending took care of the falling # issue, simply by dilution.
The CWB must now start marketing wheat American style, wheather they like it or not.
I really hope this solves problems, and makes our wheat more valuable, not discounting Canadian wheat again!
So much for product differentiation!
Comment
-
The internet is a very powerful tool. Did anyone catch up with the rumour that canola oil had serious health risks? (see Western Producer of April 5/01 page 23) This erroneous message was started by a technology worker in Massachusetts who 'discovered' these concerns on a website and fired it to some friends.
They sent it to some friends, and soon it became a topic for a website about urban legends - false stories that get embedded in human consciousness.
The canola council and others have spent significant resources to counteract what started as an innocent sharing of 'mis'information.
My point is that I hope the anonymity of this site doesn't numb the participants' common sense, recognizing the world is watching (so to speak).
Falling number tests are conducted at port, and if there are problems, obviously they are rectified before the CGC provides a certificate final on any vessel. This is the basis of Canada's reputation.
Concerning visual grading, there is no question that it is not as precise as taking specific tests on specific samples, but is has proven to be very effective and inexpensive.
I'm sure that whatever problems arise as shipments arrive at port terminals, that Canada continues to meet the specifications of our customers.
Tom
Comment
-
thalpenny,
My question is then,
When will we begin to grade using milling standards, rather than visual standards.
I dug out my CIGI book and it said:
Page 700,
"...Canada is beset with geographical difficulties in moving grain to port.
However, although movement of grain to ocean ports is complex and costly, it does have one important redeeming factor -- each step of the way (from farmer's deliveries to primary elevators, to marshalling of rail carlots prior to shipment to export position, where carlots of like grade are binned at terminal elevators), grain of diverse origin is combined. Much regional variability is thereby eliminated, imparting uniformity between lots of simular grade."
It is obvious to anyone with the change to the grain handling system in the last 2 years that now our grading system must change also.
3 unit trains from one area could now fill a whole boat.
Big problem.
Maybe now it would be OK if I got paid for my specific wheat, instead of being thrown into a big blender, and getting paid for whatever got spewed out on the other end?
If I have wheat with a high falling #, would it be OK if I got paid for that?
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment