Seems this topic is slowly gaining momentum and I'd sure like to hear some comments from what you all think. Some things to consider before responding.
1. Food is not moral, the decisions of people and how governments rule countries is?
2. Should a farmer have the ability to decide how production grown on your own holdings sold and to which application or should land only be used for the production of food and used as such?
3. Since all the food crops produced in canada including livestock are sold to the rich, how can we affect world hunger if our food isn't going there in the first place?
4. Do we solve hunger issues more effectively by buying products specifically from those starving countries than any intermittent aid we provide today?
5. Is it about food vs fuel, or is it about food vs non-food use. Pharmacology, plastics, plant reactors, isolates, protein specific application production, on and on are examples. Are these applications more acceptable than fuel? What's the difference.
Anyways, a topic that will affect ag and commodity marketing in a big way, thoughts?
1. Food is not moral, the decisions of people and how governments rule countries is?
2. Should a farmer have the ability to decide how production grown on your own holdings sold and to which application or should land only be used for the production of food and used as such?
3. Since all the food crops produced in canada including livestock are sold to the rich, how can we affect world hunger if our food isn't going there in the first place?
4. Do we solve hunger issues more effectively by buying products specifically from those starving countries than any intermittent aid we provide today?
5. Is it about food vs fuel, or is it about food vs non-food use. Pharmacology, plastics, plant reactors, isolates, protein specific application production, on and on are examples. Are these applications more acceptable than fuel? What's the difference.
Anyways, a topic that will affect ag and commodity marketing in a big way, thoughts?
Comment