Lets see what the situation is...apparently Strahl tries an end-run around the law and gets caught. His government plans change before a flawed plebiscit/vote even confirms that a change is desirable.
What is a judge supposed to do? The judge can't okay what Strahl and company did... so voila...the decision HAD to be against the government.
Run the changes THROUGH parliament and get them passed. What is the problem? If the changes make sense then they will pass in parliament.
This whole mess could have been avoided if Harper's government had acted LEGALLY. What a bunch of power hungry maroons.
What is a judge supposed to do? The judge can't okay what Strahl and company did... so voila...the decision HAD to be against the government.
Run the changes THROUGH parliament and get them passed. What is the problem? If the changes make sense then they will pass in parliament.
This whole mess could have been avoided if Harper's government had acted LEGALLY. What a bunch of power hungry maroons.
Comment