Who Pays National Canadian Wheat Board Licensing Costs?
Edited Committee Evidence * AGRI * Number 065 (Official Version)
06/11/2001 9:08 AM
Mr. Howard Hilstrom: Sure they make money. They've got a monopoly of acquiring it and this is an interesting thing that Neil brought out, that for some farmers they get back as much as 110%, under this famous pooling system and that obviously you've taken 10% ITom somebody else to give to that person just because of the bureaucratic system.You can answer that, this is my last question.
How come Ontario and the rest of Canada and B.C. do not want to be involved with the Canadian Wheat Board and have them do their marketing? And also you can cover at the same time, who is paying the fees for the manufactured feed, the seed growers for all these export permits? Who is paying those fees? Is it not the pooling system because that's the only money you guys get? I'll let you answer those questions.
Mr. Ken Ritter: Sir, we have jurisdiction, Mr. Hilstrom, through the chair, over grain produced in the designated area and that's our jurisdiction. So there's a difference between that and Ontario and the Maritimes and so forth. The fees that are involved with the granting of an export licence, I'll refer that over to Jim, but my lmowledge is that, you lmow, it's very, very minimal, and it is a requirement under the legislation that we do that.
Mr. Howard Hilstrom: Who pays it?
Mr. Ken Ritter: Pardon?
Mr. Howard Hilstrom: Who pays those fees?
Mr. Ken Ritter: Well, it comes out of the general pooling accountÂ
Mr. Howard Hilstrom: Right.
Designated Area farmers ONLY, pay the national licensing costs. It is supposed to be the Federal Government who pays the costs of national licensing. Q Do you really think Parliament would make Western farmers pay the licenisng costs of exporting an Eastern miller's flour, and then put it into legislation ? Think about it twice. Now a third time.
NO. But we're still paying. Pars.
Edited Committee Evidence * AGRI * Number 065 (Official Version)
06/11/2001 9:08 AM
Mr. Howard Hilstrom: Sure they make money. They've got a monopoly of acquiring it and this is an interesting thing that Neil brought out, that for some farmers they get back as much as 110%, under this famous pooling system and that obviously you've taken 10% ITom somebody else to give to that person just because of the bureaucratic system.You can answer that, this is my last question.
How come Ontario and the rest of Canada and B.C. do not want to be involved with the Canadian Wheat Board and have them do their marketing? And also you can cover at the same time, who is paying the fees for the manufactured feed, the seed growers for all these export permits? Who is paying those fees? Is it not the pooling system because that's the only money you guys get? I'll let you answer those questions.
Mr. Ken Ritter: Sir, we have jurisdiction, Mr. Hilstrom, through the chair, over grain produced in the designated area and that's our jurisdiction. So there's a difference between that and Ontario and the Maritimes and so forth. The fees that are involved with the granting of an export licence, I'll refer that over to Jim, but my lmowledge is that, you lmow, it's very, very minimal, and it is a requirement under the legislation that we do that.
Mr. Howard Hilstrom: Who pays it?
Mr. Ken Ritter: Pardon?
Mr. Howard Hilstrom: Who pays those fees?
Mr. Ken Ritter: Well, it comes out of the general pooling accountÂ
Mr. Howard Hilstrom: Right.
Designated Area farmers ONLY, pay the national licensing costs. It is supposed to be the Federal Government who pays the costs of national licensing. Q Do you really think Parliament would make Western farmers pay the licenisng costs of exporting an Eastern miller's flour, and then put it into legislation ? Think about it twice. Now a third time.
NO. But we're still paying. Pars.
Comment