So chucksquared, you think it should be one person one vote? How do you think that concept would go down when shareholder votes are held? You own 99% of the outstanding shares of a company, and the guy with 1% has the same weight as you with one vote each? Feel good?
The CWB likes to view and talk about itself as a corporation, not a government. It says it is a commercial entity. It even calls farmers its shareholders - or used to. Yet when it comes to voting for marketing choice or for its Board of Directors (truly a corporate governance system - its not a parliament or a legislature or a municipal council- its a BOARD OF DIRECTORS) you want the vote to be like its a government.
Which is it? Fish or fowl?
The CWB likes to view and talk about itself as a corporation, not a government. It says it is a commercial entity. It even calls farmers its shareholders - or used to. Yet when it comes to voting for marketing choice or for its Board of Directors (truly a corporate governance system - its not a parliament or a legislature or a municipal council- its a BOARD OF DIRECTORS) you want the vote to be like its a government.
Which is it? Fish or fowl?
Comment