first of all i thought i did with the $13 durum contracts but as usual Burbert you missed the point. Its not about the highest price, its about margins. risk management, all words you don't understand. I would love to come and see Burbert what you have done with your farm. I think it would put all your comments on this site in perspective. Just shows you calling me and generation young spuds how little respect you have. YOU will be rolled over in the future by us if you are unwilling to change.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Old fools2
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Comment
-
They may "say" they want to eliminate the senate, but who here thinks for a nanosecond that they wouldn't encourage their own cronies to accept senate seats offered to them?
Comment
-
keeping on the Old fools thread
I have found in my CWB campaigning that many old farmers that still live on the farm are split on the issue I tend to have more who I talk to anti monopoly but I know there are many real farmers still on the land who love the CWB and all that it stands for. But there lies the heart of the issue REAL farmers
In my district # 6 in just a quick look over the voters list and easy math
( I know how much the monopoly supporters hate math)
this is what I figured
Calgary had 35 voters in district 6 Regina 62 Swift current about a dozen 3 ladies from Delta BC
Edmonton about 20
moose jaw 42
the above cities are all outside the district I had a bunch of Ballots go to all over the states mostly California
and all over Canada mostly BC and Ontario
but its also the cities and big town where people retire to that get me Melfort had 242 voters
Saskatoon had 661
PA 185
Davidson where I live and farm had 222 voters there are not that many farmers in town!
I see no reason why people who are not primary producers get the same vote as the ones who make the decisions
Then that leads to minimum thresholds and voting by tonnes delivered
I realize that none of these issues are new but also how important these issues are.
It all goes back to how the voters lists are created and being inclusive does not equal fair.
The monopoly has supporters, just who do they represent?
Comment
-
If the CWB could do a breakdown of voters in this poll of theirs
I would like to see who they represent
statistical data they could pass along to their farmer shareholders
Age Gender
Primary Producer/ Landlord
RM they farm in
Tonnes delivered
Monopoly/Choice
Other issues
Then mash it togeather so individuals can't be identified
I realize their surveys must do some of this but the BOD has not listened to the results of their surveys so maybe this would help.
Comment
-
GUYS guys Guys!
Why on earth should anyone... have the right to tell my farm and family who they must do business with?
They don't vote on who we sell our Canola... flax... sunflowers... einkorn... corn... soybeans... pulses... triticale... rye... oats... grassseeds... seed...
Only 'óld fools' would insist they know the best marketing choices for my families farm... and who we must do our business with.
You folks have been sucked into a black hole... the weather must have turned cold... precipitating a 'silly season' here on Agriville!
( :{ Grin!
Comment
-
Gustgd,
Your observations on where the voters live in your district is a key point in the cwb format and election process that is in error.
Why should landlords and retired parents, etc that are phasing out of farming or not even actively involved be shaping the future of the cwb. I would probably tend to vote for the cwb if I was a landlord as well because of the stability that provides. Even people who have not grown wheat in years are eligble to vote. That is not right either, why should farmers that do not even grow the product have input into how it is handled.
One voter per person it what is wrong with the cwb. If it was based on tonnes it would be balanced accordingly. I think that a full time wheat farmer with 15000 acres of wheat has a much more vested interest in the outcome of his grain marketing and pricing than a part time farmer with a 160 acres of wheat and a full time job off the farm.
If the vote was based on tonnes, and the cwb still won with a 62% margin, I will shut up and assume that the voting is correct.
Why can't the voting be done on computer? If you are using the e-services, it would be a natural to vote the same way, and should cost way less.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment