• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CWB conference call on contingency fund

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    to be fair, this is the full quote from page 45.

    "Note that the methodology used for benchmarking discretionary activity can result
    in the measurement of gains or losses that are not truly achievable in the
    marketplace. In 2007-08, of the $226 million below target, $61 million was
    determined to fall into this category."

    If this is the out for discretionary trading, what are differences in the PPO accounts
    on their losses outside normal hedging activities?

    Comment


      #22
      Doesn't benchmarking any discretionary activity, actually mean, the CWB meaning 'making it up as we go along'?

      I cannot reason it. Can you?
      Pars

      Comment


        #23
        Parsley

        No answers to your questions. I can only note that all that is being discussed is in the first 72 pages of the annual report - the unaudited portion in the annual report that reflects the reporting of CWB operations to the board of directors and ultimately farmers. The financial results/audited statements start on page 73 and back.

        Comment


          #24
          One of the reasons why I have tried, in my own small way, (zealously, as some describe it), to nurture participation on this website for so many years, is so that farmers would become more aware, and be reminded, that they create massive wealth, and retain little.

          This site is an opportunity for farmers to examine and exchange information, and discover where their money is leaking out and why it is leaking out, and who is opening the valve.

          This CWB annual report should have brought indignation. It has not.

          I note the absence of farmers calling for the resignation of the B of D.

          They raided your pool accounts with a motion, and not one has resigned.

          I note the absence of farmers calling for the resignation of the CEO

          I note the near absence of farmers interested in "following the money" although, for example, Fransisco did and is.

          The Wheat Board was very clear about telling farmers, that they would not touch the pooling accounts. The CWB took money from them. Openly. Few farmers noticed and fewer cared.

          Raiding the pool accounts is now the norm.

          And many AV farmer participants seem technologically adept, articulate, clever, and fit the role as farm managers. Many seem satisfied with the Board accessing your pooling accounts without advance notice, without notification.

          I do note keen interest in poking burbert with a stick.



          Parsley

          Comment

          • Reply to this Thread
          • Return to Topic List
          Working...