cott,
When you said,
"The Ramblings of Bill Duke kind of pissed me off on your site pars." ,
well cott, I assumed you were addressing me.
So I posted your comments on my site, as an entry all on it's own.
Your words referred to the PN editorial, which I assumed would be best suited being rebutted on the same page as the editorial, for easier following for readers. Money/banking is a complex matter.
PN can also serve as an overflow for relief from non-commodity marketing issues,(ieCWB) as is the basis of Breadwinners complaints
I also have permission from Agriville to copy any quotes from commodity marketing to post on PN.
So I did.
Perhaps the proper thing to do was to post your comments in the COMMENTS sections directly below Duke's Editorial.
Or perhaps just leave your comments unattended on PN.
But I also observed that first time readers to AV would find it difficult to make sense of the origin of your comment to me.
cott, with your permisssion, I will be glad to cut and paste AND repost your comments in the Commentary section below the Editorial Commentary to which you refer, on PN, if you allow me to. (or you can do it yourself) Just say so. parsley2008@live.ca.
Or alternately, you can make fresh comments in the commentary section. Or write a formal rebuttal, if that turns your crank. I previously offerred that option to you.
The author of the Editorial is more than welcome to make the same request and provide the same permission. parsley2008@live.ca
Or write fresh comments.
It may be that one or the other, or both, will choose not to to have their original comments reposted, or post again in response to this topic. And that's fine, too.
Decide what you are comfortable with, and we'll go from there.
Parsley
When you said,
"The Ramblings of Bill Duke kind of pissed me off on your site pars." ,
well cott, I assumed you were addressing me.
So I posted your comments on my site, as an entry all on it's own.
Your words referred to the PN editorial, which I assumed would be best suited being rebutted on the same page as the editorial, for easier following for readers. Money/banking is a complex matter.
PN can also serve as an overflow for relief from non-commodity marketing issues,(ieCWB) as is the basis of Breadwinners complaints
I also have permission from Agriville to copy any quotes from commodity marketing to post on PN.
So I did.
Perhaps the proper thing to do was to post your comments in the COMMENTS sections directly below Duke's Editorial.
Or perhaps just leave your comments unattended on PN.
But I also observed that first time readers to AV would find it difficult to make sense of the origin of your comment to me.
cott, with your permisssion, I will be glad to cut and paste AND repost your comments in the Commentary section below the Editorial Commentary to which you refer, on PN, if you allow me to. (or you can do it yourself) Just say so. parsley2008@live.ca.
Or alternately, you can make fresh comments in the commentary section. Or write a formal rebuttal, if that turns your crank. I previously offerred that option to you.
The author of the Editorial is more than welcome to make the same request and provide the same permission. parsley2008@live.ca
Or write fresh comments.
It may be that one or the other, or both, will choose not to to have their original comments reposted, or post again in response to this topic. And that's fine, too.
Decide what you are comfortable with, and we'll go from there.
Parsley
Comment