The CWB has to come clean to farmers

[cropduster]

Good deductions Chaff!!You are right, the `borg` types still don`t get it.The enormity of the situation is hitting you too!And they blissfully move along,not unlike the full page ad in farm papers of the guy whistling away!!On a per capita basis, this is far worse than the sponsorship scandal!Farmers need to ask at the accountability meetings,just how this is to be rectified!

[jensend]

chavez might be a loon but he also might have cargill figured.

[liberty]

Chavez is a thief, plain and simple. Anyone who lauds this thug is promoting thievery.

Why anyone would willingly invest a dime in Venezuela is beyond me, given that any successful investments will inevitably be stolen.

[Fransisco]

Jeez, if that's your attitude sask maybe you don't deserve to ever get ownership of your grain back.

[Hopperbin]

Apparently they were selling rice without the price controlled price stamped on the bag. Apparently by their laws and the will of the people they are able to do it.
We do have price controls on CNCP shipping of our grains. So cannot say we totally cannot have price controls on fertilizer here.

[SASKFARMER3]

Ha Ha Ha. Got you all. But Its time to discuss real things that matter.
Chavez is a crook True.
But what he is doing is trying to cling to power. Food is essential to that, so take over food supplier and your days as dictator continue.
Now to the core of this post.
Companies acted bad in the run up in prices. Perks, bonuses, allowances, private islands jets etc. Share holders got a little profit (some lots) and alot of BS about the skys the limit.
Well it came to an abrupt end. My dad use to say when things look way better than they are the end is near for that run up so get out. Well last summer was the time to bail.
Now it seems were bombarded by how much farmers will make in the year 2010 because the world still needs food. I agree the world still needs food but farmers need to make some real money or they will be lost.
Maybe thats happening already since alot of the land owned in USA is not owned by the individual farmer but someone else. In Canada we have super farms now run by a farmer (HA HA) and an advisory group who over see the system. These farmers are good at growing the crop. Well guess what these guys also take all the risk if the crop freezes or drys up two or more years in a row guess what the advisory group takes their losses and goes home. THe farm is bankrupt call Richie Brothers.
So farmers remember food is important to keep stability in a dictatorship and in Communist Countries, well may as well add the free world to that if price contols come in the near future.

[Fransisco]

Chaff makes a good point about currency. The board claims to do business in what is it 70 countries? That's a lot of different curriencies to have to deal with.

How come we don't see anything in the annual report about it?

[charliep]

Don't know where to put this and don't want to waste peoples time who are not interested in CWB issues.

Note the comment in February PPO and Basis commentary.

Fixed Price values are calculated using current and forecast tradable world values. While there are some markets where tradable values are more correlated with Minneapolis futures, there are many other markets that are more correlated with Kansas futures. As a result the FPC value for CWRS will fluctuate in response to changes in both Kansas and Minneapolis futures. Furthermore, because wheat committed to the 2009-10 PPO programs will be priced over the next 20 months, a change to any futures contract between December 2009 and December 2010 will have an impact on FPC values.

Always amazed at how black box the CWB makes their producer payment option processes and the level of risk in them including hedging across different futures markets. In this process, the CWB (through price discrimination) sells CWRS wheat into lower priced markets in competition with US hard red winter wheat and perhaps not in this statement but quite likely European/Former Soviet Union countries.

[stubblejumper]

The PPO comment was made tongue in cheek. It does not matter what the CWB does or does not do there are some who are so apposed to the CWB what they will oppose it at any chance. The PPO's were developed because producers wanted more choice. Instead of working with the CWB to make things work some producers just BITCH about everything and will not be satisfied until the CWB is total dismantled.

[charliep]

stubblejumper

To be clear, the losses around the discretionary trading on the overall pool
accounts or the deficit in the contingency/transfer of funds from the
pooling accounts are in your opinion not an issues that farmers should be
concerned about?