In the last 7 years we have been flooded out three years, had frost two years, one avg year and one exceptional year when all the stars aligned. So with one good year under our belts why do guys start bidding $60 for rent and $1000/acre to buy. C’mon guys we were hardly making a decent living before how are we going to make it if we increase the one expense that is directly in the farmers hands. If every year is like the last I can justify paying that kind of money, but even in an avg year that is out of the question.
I have several questions for those selling, buying and renting the land.
First for those who are selling. Why do you not offer the land to local farmers who may have bought some of the land at the price you sold it for. These are the same farmers who lent you equipment when you broke down, offered a pull when you got stuck, lent you chemical when the dealership was out, etc... . In our area there are lots of young farmers who could take over a large volume of land, why not at least offer it up too them.
To those who are buying the land. Why not rent it to local farmers, who know the land, and know how too farm it productively instead of bringing in a past young farmer of the year who should be ashamed of the crops he has grown in the past. Surely your risk of default on payment would be less renting to five farmers would be less than one.
To those renting the land, are you going to support the community, by sending your kids to the local school, buying your inputs from the local supplier, and supporting the local community. Or are you going to be coming in from miles away giving back nothing too the local community .
I know I may be coming off as what Jonhn Gormley calls a sask-a -whiner but this pisses me off because it is entirely unnecessary in our area. Sorry for the rant but i can see nothing good coming out of this latest transaction, not for the community, not for the local business’s and not for the local farmers. I know its contradictory to complain about the price of land, but how do they know that the price wouldn't have been bid higher if it wasn't offered for sale.
I have several questions for those selling, buying and renting the land.
First for those who are selling. Why do you not offer the land to local farmers who may have bought some of the land at the price you sold it for. These are the same farmers who lent you equipment when you broke down, offered a pull when you got stuck, lent you chemical when the dealership was out, etc... . In our area there are lots of young farmers who could take over a large volume of land, why not at least offer it up too them.
To those who are buying the land. Why not rent it to local farmers, who know the land, and know how too farm it productively instead of bringing in a past young farmer of the year who should be ashamed of the crops he has grown in the past. Surely your risk of default on payment would be less renting to five farmers would be less than one.
To those renting the land, are you going to support the community, by sending your kids to the local school, buying your inputs from the local supplier, and supporting the local community. Or are you going to be coming in from miles away giving back nothing too the local community .
I know I may be coming off as what Jonhn Gormley calls a sask-a -whiner but this pisses me off because it is entirely unnecessary in our area. Sorry for the rant but i can see nothing good coming out of this latest transaction, not for the community, not for the local business’s and not for the local farmers. I know its contradictory to complain about the price of land, but how do they know that the price wouldn't have been bid higher if it wasn't offered for sale.
Comment