The cashplus is about as clean as any of the CWB programs and does not involve or utilize the contingency fund in any obvious way (can't say that money isn't moved around but that is the case with all CWB practices). Off topic but will be interesting to see how the CWB handles cashplus in the 2008/09 pooling year annual report - maybe under their accounting for cash sales.
Maltster contract is $X. The farm cash plus payment is $Y. The difference is $Z, some of which is held back for administration, CWB benefit/other costs and finally some which is paid back to the farmer as the year end top up. Put another way, a malt barley cash sale is matched directly against a farmer payment. No matching across a pooling year, no hedging, etc so no pricing risk. Is a risk (actually a reality) all farmers will get paid something different so has moved a long way from the concept of pooling.
Maltster contract is $X. The farm cash plus payment is $Y. The difference is $Z, some of which is held back for administration, CWB benefit/other costs and finally some which is paid back to the farmer as the year end top up. Put another way, a malt barley cash sale is matched directly against a farmer payment. No matching across a pooling year, no hedging, etc so no pricing risk. Is a risk (actually a reality) all farmers will get paid something different so has moved a long way from the concept of pooling.
Comment